A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

6 reasons Why Google Wave will Change PLM Collaboration

6 reasons Why Google Wave will Change PLM Collaboration
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
12 June, 2009 | 2 min for reading

 It’s impossible to speak about collaboration these days, in my opinion,  without touching Google Wave. I analyzed multiple presentations, demos, videos, analyzes and would like to present my take on the 6 top reasons as to why Wave will change today’s PLM collaboration world.

 1.    Real Time

Everything happens at the same time. You are typing, uploading, searching. You can be absolutely synchronized with your colleagues and other people involved into this collaboration process. Real-time is important because in today’s life, many forms of asynchronous collaboration and/or communication create more problems rather than benefits – and this need to change. If you look at products like 3DLive,  you will see the initial appearance of online collaboration. But with the invention of GW, you will get additional performance and adaptation boost.

 2.    Online Content

Staying connected online and in real-time, actually, opens additional doors for people who are interested in online content – IP, documents, Bill of Materials. Since Wave facilitates storage of documents on the cloud, this is will be an important overall shift toward such technologies.

 3.    Embedded

Everything you are doing in GW can be embedded into the content with which Wave operates. So, from this standpoint, future PLM implementations will be able more easily to include 3D models and drawings and documents in your Collaborative Waves. Even though I still want to see how this will happen, in my opinion, it will still give an additional push for the development of technologies which will be able to merge the collaboration of one set of data with other sources of PLM data.  

 4.    Playback History

This is the killer function, in my view. The ability to play back everything you do will be the ultimate goal for all people in PLM dealing with the comparison of history (i.e. what WAS done) vs. the future (what is being proposed by the current user).

 5.    Federation

Wave will be unique and be able to run and be synchronized on multiple instances of Wave Servers. The only association that comes to my mind in this context is past SMTP implementation. I think that GW will provide a new communication model with distributed services. So, I will be able to host my GW server, let people work with this server, and collaborate with other servers.

 6.    Automation and Extensions

This is the golden age of everything. The ability to extend GW will bring many additional people and implementations so that end-users will gain even greater benefits.

 Please, note, there is no order of importance. The current order is absolutely not scientific and reflects my memory of Google Wave stuff, and not the memory of Google itself (whom I cannot compete withJ).

 So, even if GW is still not available for a wider audience, I think we can already learn a bit about how collaboration will occur in the future.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
21 March, 2011

The definition of what is Product Lifecycle Management is one of the most controversial topics in PLM blogosphere and other...

4 May, 2025

Back in 1992, Bill Clinton’s campaign faced a tough political climate. His team needed a simple, focused message to cut...

26 July, 2015

TechCrunch article Software for the full stack era speaks about brutal reality existing business software platforms are going through. From the...

18 November, 2010

The Facebook announcement about introducing of FB messaging system triggered a flood of posts. I’ve been looking over them for...

21 July, 2010

Data formats is an interesting topic in the context of engineering and manufacturing. Manufacturing company is relaying on a significant...

16 May, 2016

Monica Shnitger article Openness — will you know it when you see it? made me think again about PLM and openness. The...

1 February, 2016

Part numbers are hard. What started as a simple number and references to a part company usually purchase from a supplier,...

23 June, 2015

My earlier attempt to compare PLM vendors and cloud services raised many comments online and offline. I want to thank everybody who...

26 August, 2009

PLM as a combination of technologies, software, and methodology came long way from initial CAD systems, followed by CAE, Product...

Blogroll

To the top