A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM vs. BPM or What do you think about IBM PDIF?

PLM vs. BPM or What do you think about IBM PDIF?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
2 July, 2009 | 2 min for reading

ibm-pdifIn one of my previous posts, I raised the question if PLM needs to develop its own process tools. Looking at the few announcements made by IBM and Siemens PLM, I asked myself the following question again:  Where is PLM going regarding the implementation of Business Process Management (BPM) and SOA related frameworks? For the moment, I have more questions than answer, but my basic assumptions follow:

  1. From the PLM standpoint, business processes (or collaborative business processes) are a significant portion of what enterprise PLM does.
  2. There are about 100 companies in the world that are doing something more or less associated with Business Process Management (analysts normally talk about 10-20 top players).
  3. Pure BPM players are rarely involved into PLM implementations; PLM companies normally provide workflow and process functionality by themselves.

Comparing PLM and BPM process capabilities, I have concluded that:

  1. PLM provides a very good product-oriented workflow, but is relatively weak in enterprise functions and administration, and other middleware components.
  2. The BPM offering is always more agile and more generic compared to PLM business processes.
  3. BPM normally provides connectivity adapters… and for PLM products too.

The very interesting piece of IBM PDIF framework is related to IBM Web Sphere Process Server and additional process-oriented middleware components. I wonder what combination of PLM software from Siemens PLM will support the process components of PDIF and how they will work together. Similar frameworks are available with other big enterprise stakeholders such as Microsoft, SAP, and Oracle. How can their respectful products provide similar functionality?

Speaking broadly about PLM and BPM, I found the following questions interesting.

  1. Will PLM follow the traditional path and continue to develop BPM components to make their PLM Process technologies stronger?
  2. Will PLM vendors be interested in the acquisition of one of the available BPM pure players to get more “process stuff” on board?
  3. Will PLM adjust more to the BPM capabilities of large enterprise and platform vendors?

I look forward to your comments and opinions.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
2 December, 2009

Extensive development of social trends and connection between social trend and product lifecycle management got me to think more about...

19 November, 2010

I want to learn more about Microsoft’s strategies these days. The “big PC” is preparing to become the biggest supplier...

18 January, 2012

I’d like to talk about BPM again. I was writing about BPM in the past. Navigate to this link to...

5 May, 2018

Technology and marketing are often going side by side. Today, I want to talk about SOA (service oriented architecture), web...

29 February, 2016

Selecting of PLM solution is a daunting process that can take time and energy in the manufacturing company. How to...

10 January, 2011

Hi Everyone. I never posted New Year Resolution before. However, I decided to make this change and post Beyond PLM...

30 March, 2016

The Congress on the Future of Engineering Software (COFES 2016) is coming next week. Traditionally, COFES is a great opportunity to...

20 July, 2009

During last week, I’ve been discussing with one of my long time friends different types of enterprise systems. Very fast...

8 April, 2012

Do you think PLM software must be cool? More than two years ago, I posted FREE and COOL trends in...

Blogroll

To the top