A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM vs. BPM or What do you think about IBM PDIF?

PLM vs. BPM or What do you think about IBM PDIF?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
2 July, 2009 | 2 min for reading

ibm-pdifIn one of my previous posts, I raised the question if PLM needs to develop its own process tools. Looking at the few announcements made by IBM and Siemens PLM, I asked myself the following question again:  Where is PLM going regarding the implementation of Business Process Management (BPM) and SOA related frameworks? For the moment, I have more questions than answer, but my basic assumptions follow:

  1. From the PLM standpoint, business processes (or collaborative business processes) are a significant portion of what enterprise PLM does.
  2. There are about 100 companies in the world that are doing something more or less associated with Business Process Management (analysts normally talk about 10-20 top players).
  3. Pure BPM players are rarely involved into PLM implementations; PLM companies normally provide workflow and process functionality by themselves.

Comparing PLM and BPM process capabilities, I have concluded that:

  1. PLM provides a very good product-oriented workflow, but is relatively weak in enterprise functions and administration, and other middleware components.
  2. The BPM offering is always more agile and more generic compared to PLM business processes.
  3. BPM normally provides connectivity adapters… and for PLM products too.

The very interesting piece of IBM PDIF framework is related to IBM Web Sphere Process Server and additional process-oriented middleware components. I wonder what combination of PLM software from Siemens PLM will support the process components of PDIF and how they will work together. Similar frameworks are available with other big enterprise stakeholders such as Microsoft, SAP, and Oracle. How can their respectful products provide similar functionality?

Speaking broadly about PLM and BPM, I found the following questions interesting.

  1. Will PLM follow the traditional path and continue to develop BPM components to make their PLM Process technologies stronger?
  2. Will PLM vendors be interested in the acquisition of one of the available BPM pure players to get more “process stuff” on board?
  3. Will PLM adjust more to the BPM capabilities of large enterprise and platform vendors?

I look forward to your comments and opinions.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
14 May, 2011

It is almost two years passed since I put on my blog a question about FREE as a best future...

22 July, 2010

A very interesting video drove my attention today. Take a look on the new iPad application from a Valley company...

17 October, 2012

I want to come back to the topic of mobile apps vs. mobile browsers again. Earlier this year I posted...

6 January, 2017

The theme of user experience and UI improvements is not new. From time to time, the discussion about UI improvements...

2 October, 2021

Differentiation is a big deal in business and every company wants to stand outside compared to their business counterparts by...

5 February, 2020

Change management is one of the fundamental elements of product lifecycle control. In a nutshell, it is all about changes....

14 June, 2012

Talk to somebody about how to implement enterprise software… What is the first thing that comes to your mind? It...

30 December, 2009

If you haven’t had chance to see Microsoft Live Lab Pivot project, please do. I found this approach as somewhat...

7 July, 2010

I’ve been thinking more about what are the gaps in taking PLM to the next level of collaboration. Social trend...

Blogroll

To the top