A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM vs. BPM or What do you think about IBM PDIF?

PLM vs. BPM or What do you think about IBM PDIF?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
2 July, 2009 | 2 min for reading

ibm-pdifIn one of my previous posts, I raised the question if PLM needs to develop its own process tools. Looking at the few announcements made by IBM and Siemens PLM, I asked myself the following question again:  Where is PLM going regarding the implementation of Business Process Management (BPM) and SOA related frameworks? For the moment, I have more questions than answer, but my basic assumptions follow:

  1. From the PLM standpoint, business processes (or collaborative business processes) are a significant portion of what enterprise PLM does.
  2. There are about 100 companies in the world that are doing something more or less associated with Business Process Management (analysts normally talk about 10-20 top players).
  3. Pure BPM players are rarely involved into PLM implementations; PLM companies normally provide workflow and process functionality by themselves.

Comparing PLM and BPM process capabilities, I have concluded that:

  1. PLM provides a very good product-oriented workflow, but is relatively weak in enterprise functions and administration, and other middleware components.
  2. The BPM offering is always more agile and more generic compared to PLM business processes.
  3. BPM normally provides connectivity adapters… and for PLM products too.

The very interesting piece of IBM PDIF framework is related to IBM Web Sphere Process Server and additional process-oriented middleware components. I wonder what combination of PLM software from Siemens PLM will support the process components of PDIF and how they will work together. Similar frameworks are available with other big enterprise stakeholders such as Microsoft, SAP, and Oracle. How can their respectful products provide similar functionality?

Speaking broadly about PLM and BPM, I found the following questions interesting.

  1. Will PLM follow the traditional path and continue to develop BPM components to make their PLM Process technologies stronger?
  2. Will PLM vendors be interested in the acquisition of one of the available BPM pure players to get more “process stuff” on board?
  3. Will PLM adjust more to the BPM capabilities of large enterprise and platform vendors?

I look forward to your comments and opinions.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
6 March, 2017

Last week Amazon outage was a splashing event for everything related to cloud  computing. Amazon S3 in east cost went...

22 January, 2009

How PLM can continue growth in today’s downturn economy? I think, this is time to get back and talk about...

16 October, 2012

PLM and marketing are not good friends. Marketing did a poor job for the last 10 years for PLM. For...

24 February, 2009

Lately, I’ve seen a growing number of applications introducing the idea of real-time collaboration online on the same document. This...

26 July, 2019

Standards are like toothbrushes, a good idea but no one wants to use anyone elses. The history of engineering and...

30 May, 2021

The calls to simplify PLM systems are not something new in the industry. Although industry pundits might keep arguing about...

31 October, 2019

PTC acquired Onshape last week. Check this link for the PTC press release and more information. I’ve been following media,...

24 April, 2020

Microsoft Azure blog brings the story about how PTC and Azure partnership empowers industrial organizations. Check out the article –...

18 October, 2012

Open Source Software (OSS) is a wonderful thing. For the last decade, open source changed the world of software development....

Blogroll

To the top