A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Design and Manufacturing: Top Down PLM approach with Treehouse?

Design and Manufacturing: Top Down PLM approach with Treehouse?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
29 October, 2009 | 1 min for reading

The new release of SolidWorks Labs Threehouse V2 hit me to think again about Top Down approach and efficient communication between Design/Engineering and Manufacturing.


Background.
SolidWorks Labs released V2 of Treehouse. You can get more information on their website as well as take a look on multiple blog articles about that. My favorite was SolidSmack’s “Full Speed TreeBleed. SolidWorks Treehouse, Not Just a Treehouse“.

Design, Engineering and Manufacturing
Problem of disconnecting between Design/Engineering organization is not new, in my view and exists in many manufacturing organizations. It’s obvious Engineers sees a product they develop very much in the light, of how they build parts/sub-assemblies/assemblies/configurations models. For them this is what make sense. However, from manufacturing side, it always looks different because their structure is driven by assembly process, packaging, supply chain and other factors from a shop floor. Most of the systems today are not providing a good solution for this problem. Those customers that made decent solution in this space built it based on huge customization and service base.

Treehouse, Modular design and Top Down

In my view, Treehouse concept is interesting since it can provide a communication bridge between two worlds: design and engineering/manufacturing. The way to initiate design top-down in SolidWorks is not trivial and Treehouse can be an interesting approach to do so. It can facilitate modular design and ability to create new products and configuration top down initiated from Engineering/Manufacturing space.

What is your opinion on that? Have you had chance to think or implement the top-down approach in your organization? What systems you had in your mind to support it?

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
6 May, 2013

Microsoft Excel. What is lovely topic to finish the weekend? It was a long time, since I didn’t blog about...

8 August, 2012

One of the technological trends I’m observing these days is a trend towards granularity. Speaking about marketing, the word granularity...

4 May, 2016

Many years ago, I’ve been writing applications for AutoCAD. Back in that days, AutoCAD was a starting point for engineers...

11 March, 2017

Almost 10 years ago, Gartner defined IT obsolescence management as major emerging issue. Here is a passage from old the old article...

12 August, 2012

If you follow news these days, you probably paid attention to Outlook.com – newcomers from Microsoft and “Gmail twin brother”....

24 April, 2014

I’m attending COFES (The Congress on the Future of Engineering Software) which starts today in Scottsdale, AZ. COFES is not...

15 June, 2015

Cloud is taking PLM vendors by storm. Just few years ago, the question if manufacturing companies will adopt cloud raised...

28 September, 2015

Onshape’s $80M additional investment led by Andreessen Horowitz was clearly one of the big news last week. I shared some...

9 September, 2023

I traveled to San Francisco earlier this week to attend Autodesk DevCon 2023 – the conference for developers and Autodesk...

Blogroll

To the top