A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Design and Manufacturing: Top Down PLM approach with Treehouse?

Design and Manufacturing: Top Down PLM approach with Treehouse?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
29 October, 2009 | 1 min for reading

The new release of SolidWorks Labs Threehouse V2 hit me to think again about Top Down approach and efficient communication between Design/Engineering and Manufacturing.


Background.
SolidWorks Labs released V2 of Treehouse. You can get more information on their website as well as take a look on multiple blog articles about that. My favorite was SolidSmack’s “Full Speed TreeBleed. SolidWorks Treehouse, Not Just a Treehouse“.

Design, Engineering and Manufacturing
Problem of disconnecting between Design/Engineering organization is not new, in my view and exists in many manufacturing organizations. It’s obvious Engineers sees a product they develop very much in the light, of how they build parts/sub-assemblies/assemblies/configurations models. For them this is what make sense. However, from manufacturing side, it always looks different because their structure is driven by assembly process, packaging, supply chain and other factors from a shop floor. Most of the systems today are not providing a good solution for this problem. Those customers that made decent solution in this space built it based on huge customization and service base.

Treehouse, Modular design and Top Down

In my view, Treehouse concept is interesting since it can provide a communication bridge between two worlds: design and engineering/manufacturing. The way to initiate design top-down in SolidWorks is not trivial and Treehouse can be an interesting approach to do so. It can facilitate modular design and ability to create new products and configuration top down initiated from Engineering/Manufacturing space.

What is your opinion on that? Have you had chance to think or implement the top-down approach in your organization? What systems you had in your mind to support it?

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
14 December, 2024

I will continue to discuss PDM vs PLM and today will talk about the topic that always drives interest and...

31 May, 2010

I was reading ‘Why does Facebook fail for Product Development? (and how to fix it)” article by Jim Brown. Jim...

8 August, 2014

Process management is a very important part of any PLM software. You can find one in every PLM system. There...

8 May, 2009

  Life around us is changing dramatically. The current global economic situation and technology have the potential to change the...

20 November, 2013

Engineering and manufacturing software is full of interesting TLAs that companies continuing to invent even these days. Only yesterday GrabCAD...

10 March, 2015

Yesterday was a very busy day for online community of people involved in engineering and manufacturing software. Onshape, the new...

16 May, 2011

I’m going to attend Eurostep Share-A-Space 2011 forum later this week in Stockholm, Sweden. The history of the invitation to...

23 February, 2010

I had chance to read yesterday Arena’s whitepaper “Whose BOM is it Anyway?”. You can find the link this whitepaper...

14 November, 2011

Few months ago, I had a chance already to write about so-called “social enterprise”. The term was unveiled and supported...

Blogroll

To the top