A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Design and Manufacturing: Top Down PLM approach with Treehouse?

Design and Manufacturing: Top Down PLM approach with Treehouse?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
29 October, 2009 | 1 min for reading

The new release of SolidWorks Labs Threehouse V2 hit me to think again about Top Down approach and efficient communication between Design/Engineering and Manufacturing.


Background.
SolidWorks Labs released V2 of Treehouse. You can get more information on their website as well as take a look on multiple blog articles about that. My favorite was SolidSmack’s “Full Speed TreeBleed. SolidWorks Treehouse, Not Just a Treehouse“.

Design, Engineering and Manufacturing
Problem of disconnecting between Design/Engineering organization is not new, in my view and exists in many manufacturing organizations. It’s obvious Engineers sees a product they develop very much in the light, of how they build parts/sub-assemblies/assemblies/configurations models. For them this is what make sense. However, from manufacturing side, it always looks different because their structure is driven by assembly process, packaging, supply chain and other factors from a shop floor. Most of the systems today are not providing a good solution for this problem. Those customers that made decent solution in this space built it based on huge customization and service base.

Treehouse, Modular design and Top Down

In my view, Treehouse concept is interesting since it can provide a communication bridge between two worlds: design and engineering/manufacturing. The way to initiate design top-down in SolidWorks is not trivial and Treehouse can be an interesting approach to do so. It can facilitate modular design and ability to create new products and configuration top down initiated from Engineering/Manufacturing space.

What is your opinion on that? Have you had chance to think or implement the top-down approach in your organization? What systems you had in your mind to support it?

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
14 April, 2010

A couple of weeks ago I had healthy debates about PLM and Innovation with Jim Brown of TechClarity. If you...

11 December, 2009

I got a comment on my blog yesterday stating “back to basics”. Why do we discuss advanced stuff at the...

21 June, 2016

Data is the new oil. I’m sure this is not the first time you’ve heard this phrase. But it certainly...

18 December, 2010

Last three days I spent my time with COFES Israel. Navigate your browser to the following link to see agenda...

11 December, 2011

I’m a bit late with my top 5 review for November. It was a tough month for me because of...

29 September, 2010

Somebody asked me last week about how I see th future of PLM… Does it look like-BOM or like-Workflow? I...

21 May, 2022

Earlier this week, I was traveling to the PLM Innovation conference PI DX 2022 USA that took place in sunny...

21 January, 2013

BOM is fascinating. After posting 3 Modern BOM Management Challenges a week ago, I keep getting back to Bill of...

18 February, 2017

Have you heard about Platformization and Product Innovation Platforms? Platformization is a new trend that was outlined by several industry analysts...

Blogroll

To the top