A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Design and Manufacturing: Top Down PLM approach with Treehouse?

Design and Manufacturing: Top Down PLM approach with Treehouse?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
29 October, 2009 | 1 min for reading

The new release of SolidWorks Labs Threehouse V2 hit me to think again about Top Down approach and efficient communication between Design/Engineering and Manufacturing.


Background.
SolidWorks Labs released V2 of Treehouse. You can get more information on their website as well as take a look on multiple blog articles about that. My favorite was SolidSmack’s “Full Speed TreeBleed. SolidWorks Treehouse, Not Just a Treehouse“.

Design, Engineering and Manufacturing
Problem of disconnecting between Design/Engineering organization is not new, in my view and exists in many manufacturing organizations. It’s obvious Engineers sees a product they develop very much in the light, of how they build parts/sub-assemblies/assemblies/configurations models. For them this is what make sense. However, from manufacturing side, it always looks different because their structure is driven by assembly process, packaging, supply chain and other factors from a shop floor. Most of the systems today are not providing a good solution for this problem. Those customers that made decent solution in this space built it based on huge customization and service base.

Treehouse, Modular design and Top Down

In my view, Treehouse concept is interesting since it can provide a communication bridge between two worlds: design and engineering/manufacturing. The way to initiate design top-down in SolidWorks is not trivial and Treehouse can be an interesting approach to do so. It can facilitate modular design and ability to create new products and configuration top down initiated from Engineering/Manufacturing space.

What is your opinion on that? Have you had chance to think or implement the top-down approach in your organization? What systems you had in your mind to support it?

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
26 March, 2023

In my article today, I want to continue the discussion I started in Part 1 of my article about turning...

3 December, 2010

Collaboration is a tough word. PLM Is using this word all the time. For the last 10-15 years in this...

21 September, 2020

The topic of Intelligent Part Numbers is near and dear to the hearts of many people in the engineering, manufacturing,...

15 February, 2013

Cloud is trending and we can see more examples of how cloud technologies applies in business. PLM vendors are not...

23 August, 2010

Manufacturing company enterprise landscape becomes more and more complex every year. Companies are implementing new products and versions of existing...

19 September, 2014

It has been already few years since I started to discuss cloud PLM opportunities on my blog. I found one...

26 May, 2010

I found very interesting blog post by Active Knowledge blog about Data Management practices by Frank Lillehagen. It is worth reading. Data modeling is...

24 January, 2014

I remember a conversation that happened to me a decade ago with fellow engineer from one of leading telecom companies....

11 November, 2009

Few publications around a new company called PLM+, which left stealth mode this week, drove my attention. There is not...

Blogroll

To the top