A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Back to basics: PLM and Single Point of Truth?

Back to basics: PLM and Single Point of Truth?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
14 December, 2009 | 2 min for reading

I’m continuing with a set of ‘back to basics’ questions and discussion. My topic today is about singularity or what known in PLM as “a single point of truth”. I remember the time before computers were widely spread in engineering and manufacturing organizations and people used “Drawing on the wall”. The famous statement back to that time was – if you see drawing on the wall, think maybe there is “another wall”. Computers supposed to resolve the problem of multiple walls. However, the problem becomes even worst. Now you may have an unlimited number of “electronic walls” in your email system, disk on your laptop, server in your location or different enterprise systems. PLM comes with a very promising and illusive statement about single point of truth. From PLM standpoint, it defined as capability (or ability) to manage single (or unique) version of product data in your organization.

Now, my questions today about how to manage this uniqueness? Is it something you can see as an achievable goal for your next PLM implementation or wishful thinking? Is it something we can realistically implement in the organization with all systems we have in place? Can we achieve it in a single shot, or we need to have multiple steps to get there?

Here is my take on this (and I’m making it the most provoke as I can think about).

1. PLM Singularity (or single point of truth) represents a fundamental interest of people in the organization to organize and manage product data.
2. We can implement it in the organization, but it requires a significant effort that may vary depends on organization complexity and number of other systems involved into product development process and number of geographical locations company plan to cover by this system.
3. Implementing of singularity may take multiple steps until it will be achieved in the organization.

So, what is my conclusion today? I think, singularity cannot be considered as a goal for PLM implementation. The final cost can be too heavy to carry, and it will take long time to get there. Realistic PLM implementation need be done as “go by steps” approach. Each step will achieve goals helping organization to resolve specific issues they have in the organization or optimize existing processes. This is the only way to create something I’d call – lean PLM. If you want to implement single point of truth, think about playing “singularity chess” before :). (thanks, Paul Burgess blog for picture)


Just my thoughts. I’m looking forward to your comments.
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
5 August, 2009

Product Lifecycle Management is going full speed to social tools and technologies. With two companies, PTC and DS articulated their...

1 January, 2016

Happy New Year to all my readers. 2015 Year was amazing and I want to thank everyone for being with...

13 July, 2010

I found the following presentation by Ouriel Ohayon very interesting. Please, take a look and make your impression. Apple Study:...

24 August, 2015

Our everyday business life is changing. Remember sales people with rolodexes that helped you to find right contacts? I’m sure...

20 June, 2014

It has been a year since I published my How to select PDM system in 5 simple steps? Engineering.com article The...

5 September, 2013

The power of search giants like Google is enormous these days. Think about the amount of information Google, Twitter and...

12 July, 2024

PLM and ERP are two topics that always can trigger an interest from industrial companies and software vendors. The ubiquitous...

1 February, 2012

The world is changing fast. What was near to impossible 10 years ago tomorrow, becomes a reality today. It related...

11 March, 2011

Are you familiar with the “Killer App” syndrome? In my view, conversations about a “Killer App” are very popular when...

Blogroll

To the top