A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM: Backward Evolution Into Lifelike 3D

PLM: Backward Evolution Into Lifelike 3D
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
11 February, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Recent presentation on SolidWorks World 2010 about evolution of PLM drove me to think about what is the future of 3D and PLM in longer term. For those who haven’t had chance to see these materials, please take a look on the slide below. What we can see is the strategic move from the world of PLM to the world of (3D) Lifelike Experience


Does it mean PLM vendors is moving back to their 3D roots? Does it mean for PLM to be less involved into overall product lifecycle and processes? Maybe this move will allow better balancing between operational efficiency of ERP to manage corporate resources and combine it with the ability of PLM to manage a comprehensive set of product data?

Historically, PLM grew up from the ability to manage 2D and 3D geometry data. In the beginning, it was about CAD files. Ability to manage product data was the obvious strength of PLM in comparison to material-purchasing world of ERP. Unfortunately, PLM clashed with ERP on their interest to manage engineering product data and interest to drive processes in the organization. PLM made significant efforts to take over management of organizational processes around product design, planning, manufacturing and support. Nevertheless, “money talks” and PLM is still considered as a “step-child’ when you present this solution to CIO in comparison to ERP. In my view, by moving focus into Lifelike experience and Virtual 3D, PLM can become dominant in the overall product creation (from the requirement to material behavior) and leave ERP with operational responsibilities.

Does it mean PLM gave up? I don’t think so. In my view, move towards Lifelike experience, shows transformation from the process-focus into the end-to-end product-focus. PLM will be able to manage a complete set of product information. This is a very interesting move that can change enterprise system landscape. PLM (or 3D Lifelike Experience?) will be more focused on product engineering including all aspects of product requirement, design, manufacturing and user experience. ERP systems will be more focused on the processes and resources.

What is my conclusion? Move from PLM to advanced 3D can remove long term clash between ERP and PLM in the process management domain. ERP will expand into process management focus and PLM will be taking their position in the product engineering management with big emphasizing of 3D, Realistic Design and Manufacturing. Sounds like a rational decision to me.

Just my thoughts… What do you think about that?
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
25 April, 2013

Are you familiar with term “silo”. When it comes to enterprises and large organizations, we often can hear about different...

2 March, 2017

Propel PLM article – Can you trust your on-prem PLM vendor to evolve raises a question about how efficiently and quickly...

13 January, 2015

Let’s be honest. Engineers hate data management. This is something that stands between their engineering creativity and formal configuration control....

16 October, 2013

Social PLM is not cool any more. The article Why is Social PLM DOA? from PLMJim popped up in my twitter...

17 July, 2019

Some of my PLM friends like to say – PLM is a journey and not some kind of software. Well,...

1 September, 2013

The core fundamental part of every PDM/PLM application is database and related data model. The history of data modeling is...

30 May, 2009

Analyzing waves comes out of Google Wave presentation. I can see multiple responses and perspectives on potentail use of Google...

7 November, 2016

CMS wire blog article written by David Roe brought news about Microsoft Power Apps. Navigate here to read more. Power Apps...

6 April, 2010

Oh, yes… iPad is finally here. Do you think it will create new opportunities to PLM vendors? This is a...

Blogroll

To the top