A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Consolidation in EDA and PLM Pitfalls

Consolidation in EDA and PLM Pitfalls
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
19 March, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I was watching Mentor Graphics presentation yesterday about their Valor acquisition. If you haven’t had a chance to watch it, take a look on the following link – Consolidation in EDA and PLM State of Mind. The presentation impressed me by slides and explanations. The acquisition’s target is clear and presenting an interest to create integration between design and manufacturing in the Electronic Design industry domain.

The presentation made me think about some fundamental trend in engineering and product development. This trend is about integrated systems. It seems to me EDA industry is following PLM state of mind in the creation of integrated design to manufacturing systems. PLM leaders – Dassault and UGS (now Siemens), passed exactly the same trends by acquisition of manufacturing software companies (Delmia and Tecnomatix).

Quote from Aberdeen’s Michele Boucher, finally confirmed my thoughts:

“In the mechanical world there have been significant moves by PLM vendors to expand their solutions footprint into manufacturing. The acquisition of Valor by Mentor Graphics is the first such move by a major ECAD vendor and constitutes a substantial step forward in providing end-to-end development solutions for the electronics industry.”

However, there is one thing I wanted to raise and discuss. The following side presented the biggest industry problem and reason for acquisition-  fragmentation. The similar problem was presented by PLM industries during the analyzes of design, engineering, manufacturing and other systems. As a result, the complex integrated PLM systems were created.

My take on this:

1. Integration of the systems is a very complex task
2. PLM systems focused on MCAD mostly, already did it in the past
3. Integrated systems in PLM domain created a huge level of complexity
4. Cost of the system’s lifecycle and changes are growing exponentially with the increased level of integration.

I’m sure Mentor Graphics engineering wizards will create an integrated models and maybe even standards to combine data and process flow between various components of EDA systems. Will they be able to resolve the similar problem created by PLM systems? It seems to me, people less think about a cost of change when creating an integrated system. World “integration” is so positive, then people tend to forget about a possible impact in the future.

Just my thoughts… What is your opinion?
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
22 January, 2015

One of the most complicated parts of any PLM implementation is data modeling. Depends on PLM vendor, product and technology,...

30 June, 2015

Do you remember what is “hard copy listing”? If you had a chance to write software programs in 1980s, you...

13 August, 2013

Processes. Every organization is driven by processes. Even if you don’t have any process management systems, processes are there. You...

19 June, 2015

I like links. The things about links are fascinating. It is about connection between products, people, companies and things. The...

16 April, 2012

I was very busy since last Thursday. As you probably know, I was attended COFES 2012. It took all my time...

30 November, 2010

Vendor Lock-In is painful. I think, customers in the space of CAD/PLM even more sensitive to this issue. Proprietary CAD...

6 February, 2023

Are you seeking an efficient, cost-effective solution for managing product lifecycle information or searching for a way to integrate multiple...

5 November, 2010

Yesterday, I had the unique opportunity to participate in the webinar with a very intriguing name – Why Hasn’t PLM...

12 May, 2021

Earlier today, I attended the PI DX online meeting – Is Digital Thread Doomed WIthout Open Architecture. The virtual event...

Blogroll

To the top