A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Consolidation in EDA and PLM Pitfalls

Consolidation in EDA and PLM Pitfalls
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
19 March, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I was watching Mentor Graphics presentation yesterday about their Valor acquisition. If you haven’t had a chance to watch it, take a look on the following link – Consolidation in EDA and PLM State of Mind. The presentation impressed me by slides and explanations. The acquisition’s target is clear and presenting an interest to create integration between design and manufacturing in the Electronic Design industry domain.

The presentation made me think about some fundamental trend in engineering and product development. This trend is about integrated systems. It seems to me EDA industry is following PLM state of mind in the creation of integrated design to manufacturing systems. PLM leaders – Dassault and UGS (now Siemens), passed exactly the same trends by acquisition of manufacturing software companies (Delmia and Tecnomatix).

Quote from Aberdeen’s Michele Boucher, finally confirmed my thoughts:

“In the mechanical world there have been significant moves by PLM vendors to expand their solutions footprint into manufacturing. The acquisition of Valor by Mentor Graphics is the first such move by a major ECAD vendor and constitutes a substantial step forward in providing end-to-end development solutions for the electronics industry.”

However, there is one thing I wanted to raise and discuss. The following side presented the biggest industry problem and reason for acquisition-  fragmentation. The similar problem was presented by PLM industries during the analyzes of design, engineering, manufacturing and other systems. As a result, the complex integrated PLM systems were created.

My take on this:

1. Integration of the systems is a very complex task
2. PLM systems focused on MCAD mostly, already did it in the past
3. Integrated systems in PLM domain created a huge level of complexity
4. Cost of the system’s lifecycle and changes are growing exponentially with the increased level of integration.

I’m sure Mentor Graphics engineering wizards will create an integrated models and maybe even standards to combine data and process flow between various components of EDA systems. Will they be able to resolve the similar problem created by PLM systems? It seems to me, people less think about a cost of change when creating an integrated system. World “integration” is so positive, then people tend to forget about a possible impact in the future.

Just my thoughts… What is your opinion?
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
27 August, 2010

I had a chance to read an article by ebizQ related to Cordys BPM. For those who is not aware...

21 November, 2010

I was reading NYT on my flight today. The following article made me feel bad. Google TV, Usability is Not...

17 August, 2015

Last year, my attention was caught by CIMdata article – IBM Forms New Watson Group to Meet Growing Demand for...

15 July, 2012

I made my weekly social media catch up during the weekend. The following topic caught my attention. Google recently started...

6 April, 2021

My last week’s article about FFF (Form. Fit and Function), triggered many interesting discussions online and offline. Thank you all...

30 November, 2018

Back in 2011, I published my article saying that Aras lines up against Windchill, Enovia and Teamcenter. The question I asked...

27 January, 2016

  Software is eating the word. Our dependencies on software is increasing. Imagine your life without few software products you’re...

6 December, 2020

The discussion about single-tenant vs multi-tenant cloud PLM models is getting more interesting every day. And it is not only...

12 February, 2021

3D EXPERIENCE WORLD 2021 was live earlier this week and I was watching a few sessions. Moving from products to...

Blogroll

To the top