A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Manufacturer Priorities and PLM Integration Lock

Manufacturer Priorities and PLM Integration Lock
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
21 March, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I have chance to listed AMR’s Mike Burket interview during Siemens PLM Innovation Summit. It seems to me as a very interesting talk and slides about current PLM priorities. You can see it on this link. Thanks Dora Smith for this nice blog post, video and slides. One of the key requirements coming from manufacturers today are around cost reduction, better integration operation and product development as well as improvements in a supply value chain.

I counted two issues that, in my view, can be considered as very old requirements and demanded by many customers long time:
1. Design to Manufacturing Processes
2. Supporting of segmentation in Supply Chain.

On the one side, you can think about them as two separate issues. However, these two issues share one common fundamental problem of PLM systems. The problem is how to organize  integrated cross organizational processes. If you will take a look on the following slide presented by Mike, the need for integration is something that I see as a must requirement to link demand insight, product development and supply networks.

Listening Mike it becomes almost clear that process integration will become the next PLM challenge. However, here is my point. Unfortunately, integration is a very expensive job. All integrated projects I know, took a lot of time, resources and, in my view, doesn’t fit IT budgets. The issue of reduced IT budgets makes this problem even more important and critical. Many of today’s PLM integrated projects were possible only due to result of long and dedicated work done by vendors, services providers and organizations.

What is my conclusion? There is no magic outside of powerpoint slides. Integration is hard. Nobody can do it easy today. Big PLM systems provide a comprehensive product development environment, but they are not adaptable for lean cross-organizational process integration. How to find a way to reduce PLM integrated project cost and improve the agility of product development environment? This is sounds as a deadlock and the biggest challenge for manufacturers and PLM vendors in coming future.

Just my opinion.
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
3 July, 2020

I’m catching up more on Siemens RealizeLIVE and today I want to talk about flexibility and customization. I learned about...

19 April, 2013

Technological predictions are tough and nobody wants to make them. Back in 2010, I came with the following post –...

10 December, 2014

Cloud PLM is a trending topic among software vendors these days. As I mentioned earlier in my post, the question...

18 August, 2014

To manage Parts and Bill of Materials is not a simple tasks. I shared some of aspects related to the...

4 May, 2025

Back in 1992, Bill Clinton’s campaign faced a tough political climate. His team needed a simple, focused message to cut...

20 November, 2014

The Engineering.com publication about PLM taking ownership of MBOM ignited a few discussions online about the Bill of Materials, BOM...

16 June, 2015

Culture can eat strategy for breakfast and technology for lunch. When it comes to PLM, the implementation and organizational alignment...

30 January, 2021

Standards are super important. They provide us a basis for mutual understanding and used in products and technologies to support...

1 July, 2010

I have been paying more attention to open source last time. What I wanted to analyze is how Open Source...

Blogroll

To the top