A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM and SharePoint Scalability

PLM and SharePoint Scalability
Oleg
Oleg
14 March, 2011 | 1 min for reading

Since Microsoft first released MOSS 2007, I can see an increased amount of manufacturing companies are investigating a potential move to SharePoint. Microsoft used brilliant freemium strategy and decided to give away a basic version of SharePoint (WSS – Windows SharePoint Services) bundled to Windows Server license. It created a significant flow of SharePoint viral evaluations in companies. Because of deployment and implementation ease, many companies started to implement WSS to improve the ability to share data and streamline collaboration. Sometimes, the solution growths can be really spontaneous.

I found the link published by Paul Andrew of Microsoft, very useful to evaluate your need and check upfront if your organizational demand and scale can fit SharePoint boundaries. The following two documents Estimate Performance and Capacity Requirements for Large Scale Document Repositories and SharePoint Server 2010 capacity management: Software boundaries and limits will take you to a long journey of planning an appropriate environment for your future SharePoint implementations.

During last few years, some PLM vendors and their partners made a bet on SharePoint as a platform to mainstream PLM deployment in organizations. User experience and IT compliance are two factors that made a significant influence on vendors, partners and companies. Such products as Windchill ProductPoint or TeamCenter Community are completely relying on Office and SharePoint platform as an infrastructure.

What is my conclusion? Microsoft SharePoint is a large a complicated platform. Sometimes, I can see people having some illusions with regards how easy they can deploy SharePoint based solution for their product development needs. To check detailed SharePoint pre-requisites and make sizing of your drawings and other product-related information is obvious, but important. Just my thoughts..

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
17 July, 2009

The key part of all news about Office 2010 is free, browser based version of Microsoft’s most popular Office products....

5 October, 2015

Everyone likes innovation. It gives you good feeling and brings the whole power of imagination into your brain. If you...

22 August, 2011

Cloud and Security. I hope I’ve got your attention a bit :). In 99% of my talks about PLM and...

11 April, 2017

Speed and complexity. These are two main challenges for every PLM implementation. So, much was said about this topic in...

6 March, 2019

User interface or how we more often call it these days “user experience” (UX) is tough. Enterprise systems, PLM and CAD...

10 August, 2016

PLM can do everything. IoT is PLM, Digital Thread is PLM. The unfortunate behavior of sales people is to over-promise...

7 March, 2018

For many years, PLM analysts, consultants and vendors claimed that silos are bad and need to be broken to transform...

15 July, 2010

My new website and blog is BeyondPLM. The original post is here. The question of identification is probably of the...

17 June, 2016

I’m digesting information from Autodesk Forge DevCon event I attended earlier this week in San Francisco. One of the technical...

Blogroll

To the top