A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM and SharePoint Scalability

PLM and SharePoint Scalability
Oleg
Oleg
14 March, 2011 | 1 min for reading

Since Microsoft first released MOSS 2007, I can see an increased amount of manufacturing companies are investigating a potential move to SharePoint. Microsoft used brilliant freemium strategy and decided to give away a basic version of SharePoint (WSS – Windows SharePoint Services) bundled to Windows Server license. It created a significant flow of SharePoint viral evaluations in companies. Because of deployment and implementation ease, many companies started to implement WSS to improve the ability to share data and streamline collaboration. Sometimes, the solution growths can be really spontaneous.

I found the link published by Paul Andrew of Microsoft, very useful to evaluate your need and check upfront if your organizational demand and scale can fit SharePoint boundaries. The following two documents Estimate Performance and Capacity Requirements for Large Scale Document Repositories and SharePoint Server 2010 capacity management: Software boundaries and limits will take you to a long journey of planning an appropriate environment for your future SharePoint implementations.

During last few years, some PLM vendors and their partners made a bet on SharePoint as a platform to mainstream PLM deployment in organizations. User experience and IT compliance are two factors that made a significant influence on vendors, partners and companies. Such products as Windchill ProductPoint or TeamCenter Community are completely relying on Office and SharePoint platform as an infrastructure.

What is my conclusion? Microsoft SharePoint is a large a complicated platform. Sometimes, I can see people having some illusions with regards how easy they can deploy SharePoint based solution for their product development needs. To check detailed SharePoint pre-requisites and make sizing of your drawings and other product-related information is obvious, but important. Just my thoughts..

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
6 November, 2009

I’d like to share some thoughts related to processes. There is a clear, ability to manage processes is very important....

7 November, 2011

The information overflow. This is not something surprising you. In many situations, we are not reading, but scanning keywords. Sometimes...

24 June, 2010

I read Fortune CNN Money Blog article by Jon Fortt – Chrysler’s Engineering Software Shift. In the competitive world of...

28 May, 2010

What will be the future of collaboration? I’d expect it to be very different. I can recommend you a very...

29 May, 2009

I’ve been playing with Microsoft Vine Beta last few days. For me this is sort of contextual collaboration. You can put...

10 June, 2009

I’d like to continue yesterday’s discussion about PLM basics and talk about our ability to manage history and time in...

4 May, 2025

Back in 1992, Bill Clinton’s campaign faced a tough political climate. His team needed a simple, focused message to cut...

1 April, 2016

PLM software is hard to interact with. I think the hardest part is PLM workflows. Usually very sophisticated it creates...

30 December, 2010

I was reading Salesforce.com announcement made earlier this month during Dreamforce 2010 conference about introduction of a new database.com platform....

Blogroll

To the top