A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why PLM should not think about ownership?

Why PLM should not think about ownership?
Oleg
Oleg
10 October, 2013 | 3 min for reading

who-should-own-plm

Enterprise software business is complicated. It often comes with questions of system responsibilities and ownerships. IT usually holds primarily responsibility for cross company software stack. At the same time, divisions and departments often try to influence IT and make their own decision related to what software to use independently. One of the terms came out of this political and technological confrontation is shadow IT.

Ownership is a sensitive question. In enterprise organization (manufacturing companies are included) it often involved with many politics, hidden agendas and power influence. This is a reality of many enterprise organizations. By the nature, PLM is getting deeply involved in this politics. If you think about PLM as a business strategy focused on organizational processes, it becomes clear why it is hard to avoid cross departments conflicts. Then, if you think about PLM as a technology, you might appreciate why ownership of a particular set of technology and/or data can be involved in the same cross department operation politics.

Earlier this week, I’ve been reading Aras blog – Who should take ownership of PLM? Navigate to the following link to have a read (). Draw your own opinion. I think it provide some interesting perspective on PLM ownership. This is how Aras blog explained that:

With this business dynamic in mind, have you reexamined who should take ownership of PLM in your organization? Something to consider, there will be different driving forces behind PLM depending upon who has ownership. Here are some to keep in mind: Should Design select and own the PLM system? As you’ve likely seen, the main focus of PLM is in CAD file management, change management and BOM management when design is at the wheel. What about Operations? With cost reduction, inventory management and purchasing at the top of their priorities you can bet these will be the focus for Operations driven PLM as well. What about Quality? With the Quality organization leading, the driving forces for PLM are likely to be compliance, regulations and overall quality of products.

I agree, the story is really not black and white. However, good organization will break this story down to the pieces of business processes and technologies. There are clear benefits for division and departments to be responsible for their processes. This is should be an ultimate goal. Nevertheless, I still can see some overall responsibility on product development processes (especially when it comes to cross functional teams). So, to have somebody responsible for product can provide a lot of value. At the same time, it doesn’t mean technology needs to be driven by the same department people. I see technological and software stack responsibility separately. Sometimes, it can come as multiple pieces of product and technologies.

What is my conclusion? In my view, the question of “PLM ownership” is a wrong one. It must be split into business, process, communication and technologies. It is obvious Quality (or any other) department should be responsible for how processes are organized. However, it doesn’t imply ownership of technologies and software pieces. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Image is courtesy of Aras blog. 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
7 November, 2016

CMS wire blog article written by David Roe brought news about Microsoft Power Apps. Navigate here to read more. Power Apps...

30 July, 2018

I’ve been catching up on some reading during the weekend. The following article by Tech-Clarify caught my attention – Siemens...

30 July, 2023

You cannot modern products using outdated and old technologies. Designing and building products is a complex process and you better...

13 December, 2008

Term social networking comes to us from Web. Web sites like MySpace, Facebook and LinkedIn, I think, well known. I’d...

25 June, 2015

The era of mass production is near the end. The demand for mass customization is coming. We can see signs...

7 March, 2016

Last week announcement about Autodesk and Siemens PLM agreement to increase software interoperability generated waves of articles. Here are few notable...

4 June, 2013

IaaS, PaaS, SaaS… Most probably you are familiar with this abbreviations. These are fundamental layers in cloud computing these days....

20 November, 2017

One of the things that caught my attention last week at Autodesk University 2017, was Andrew Anagnost, Autodesk CEO keynote...

17 August, 2010

I want to continue the discussion started last week in my post ‘PDM vs. PLM: A Data Perspective‘. Thank you...

Blogroll

To the top