A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Open Standards and Data Sharing

Open Standards and Data Sharing
Oleg
Oleg
23 March, 2011 | 2 min for reading

What do you think about the role of standards in CAD and PLM? Some of recent development in Open Standards made me think about CAD and PLM related standards again. I had a chance to discuss “the standards” theme several times in the past on my blog. Navigate to the following links to catch up the discussion.

PLM and Open Standards – Money Talks?
PLM Standards: From Formats to Frameworks
What is the future of CAD and PLM Standards?
Open PLM – A Climb for Losers?

Standards: Obvious and Expensive

In my view, customers are interested in standards. Their reaction on standard is normally positive. The benefits of standard-related activities for customers are obvious. In the past large manufacturing companies were involved in the successful standard development. STEP is probably one of the examples. At the same time, I cannot see vendors are signing up for open standards in the world of CAD and PLM. They are mostly reactive and keep balance of supporting standard and proprietary system development.

Data Sharing and Standards

Manufacturing is global these days. To be able to exchange information between in-shore and off-shore, OEM and suppliers, vendors and partners become extremely important. Do you think “data sharing” problem will disappear with the development of open standards? I don’t see direct dependencies. Obviously, it will be easier to exchange data using standards. However, the devil is in details. The support of particular application features and/or data elements will give us a right answer on this question.

What is my conclusion? To support open standard is expensive tax. Who will pay it? Customers? Vendors? My favorite joke: Standards like toothbrushes. Everybody needs them, but nobody wants to use somebody else one. Next month, I’m going to attend Eurostep Share-A-Space 2011 Forum. Read more about this forum on LinkedIn. I hope to learn more the potential role of Eurostep in the supporting of standards as well as about development of commercial systems based on such a standard like STEP and PLCS. I’m going to live blog from there, so stay tuned…

Best, Oleg
Freebie.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
7 April, 2009

Well, finally it happened 🙂 (April 1 SpaceClaim Twitter AddIn Prank) – the first CAD system to present integration with Twitter. So,...

28 July, 2024

In my recent article about the growing importance of Manufacturing BOM (MBOM) management, I explored various integration methods between CAD,...

28 September, 2016

Engineers don’t like PDM (product data management) and consider it as an unnecessarily evil. At the same time, complexity of...

15 December, 2023

Earlier this week, I attended CIMdata webinar. The goal for webinar was to provide a brief review of PLM economy...

18 March, 2018

To define PLM can be a tough job for manufacturing organizations. Usually, my practical recommendation to manufacturing companies is not...

1 October, 2009

30 September was time for 100’000 happy individuals to get Google Wave invitation. Even I’m not part of these 100’000,...

16 September, 2015

Buzzwords is one of the funniest things in enterprise software. PLM industry is guilty many times for overused buzzword lingo....

15 June, 2015

Cloud is taking PLM vendors by storm. Just few years ago, the question if manufacturing companies will adopt cloud raised...

27 November, 2014

MBOM (Manufacturing BOM) is a tough problem. Initially, you might think about it as an easy problem. Especially, since companies...

Blogroll

To the top