A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

COFES, Microsoft and Engineering Software Business Models

COFES, Microsoft and Engineering Software Business Models
Oleg
Oleg
16 April, 2011 | 2 min for reading

COFES is a think tank for engineering software. This is a place where you can drop any idea and see if it resonates. One of the COFES sessions is so called Maieutic Parataxis session. Think about pitching your idea in front of 300 people. You can see a sequence of 7-10 pitches from people compressed in a row. This is what Maieutic Parataxis is about. Last year I shared the story about Simon Floyd of Microsoft talking about PLM Excels: COFES, Maieutic Parataxies and PLM Excels. This year Simon came with a new idea of future business models for engineering software. Some of Simon’s slides and observations were resonating with my previous thoughts about PLM software business models. About a year ago, I wrote about Faltered Licenses and Future PLM Business Models. I talked about Subscriptions, Advertising and Reverse models. Take a look on Simon’s slides and make your opinion.

What is my take on this? The engineering software is changing slowly. The dynamics are different from the consumer market where the idea of market pace was realized and succeed. I can see multiple reasons why it happens. The most important reason is what I call “a good enough” principle. Traditional manufacturers are very conservative. Software is just a tool for them to produce the result. Existing software can run these companies for years. At the same time, I can see signs of changes. There are two main reasons, in my view: cost and competition. In order to compete on the market, companies need to find more efficient software to get a job done. Engineering software market place can offer a diverse set of tools that can be used. However, the compatibility of these tools, data access and many other reasons can potentially lay down this idea. Leading companies in this space are thinking about market place and application granularity. I think next 5-7 years can show the potential of the realization of this model.  Just my thought…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
27 June, 2012

Communities are booming these days. Social networks and Web 2.0 unlocked the potential of interaction online and the idea of...

1 February, 2016

Part numbers are hard. What started as a simple number and references to a part company usually purchase from a supplier,...

15 June, 2025

Recently, I came across a thought-provoking LinkedIn article by Prof. Jörg Fischer, where he made a bold observation: “PLM vendors...

19 October, 2020

When a company starts thinking about PLM there is nothing more important than to wrap your head around the idea...

9 February, 2017

Sometimes things are happening in a very unexpected way. And the news about Carl Bass stepping down as Autodesk CEO...

3 July, 2017

According to IDC research, manufacturing industry is going to invest near $178bn in the next 4 years in IoT solutions....

5 March, 2023

In an ever-evolving digital landscape, data has become a powerful currency for driving businesses forward. Data is transforming today’s manufacturing...

27 August, 2023

Startups are brutal. According to multiple statistics from Forbes, CB Insight, and other sources, 90% to 97% of startups will...

15 February, 2010

I want to get back to social applications and PLM topic. You can ask me why? Last week was the...

Blogroll

To the top