A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Implementations and KISSASSing

PLM Implementations and KISSASSing
Oleg
Oleg
26 May, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Services is a significant part of every PLM implementation. According to CIMData, about 60% of cPDM revenues is coming from services. This is a huge number. Simplicity is another big issue related to PLM implementations. Keep it simple. Another important one is about to have C-level sponsor in an organization for your PLM project. To keep it simple and having C-level sponsor in your organization are, in my view, two most important elements of a successful PLM strategy.

The implementation of SharePoint always reminds me PLM implementation. It consumes a lot of energy, preparation, meeting and consulting work. The following blog post made me laugh – A new methodology for planning SharePoint Projects – how to win a tender. I learned a new buzzword or TLA (Three letter acronym): KISSASSing.

This is my favorite passage:

The problem I found with KISS is that when you pitch your design to other types of audience, for example, upper management, it tends not to be accepted. Initially, I thought it may be that management are less prone to like being called “stupid” (which is why I always phrased it “Keep it simple, silly!” – but that never improved things much), but the more I thought about it, I realized that those audiences just expect more out of a solution design than just simplicity. In other words – KISSing the upper management is not enough. This is why I decided to come up with my own new principle that extends KISS and adds the things that upper management really wants from a solution architect: Keep It Simple, Stable, Available, Scalable and Secure.

What is my conclusion? Simple, Stable, Available, Scalable, Secure.  This is actually, a very good slogan for PLM marketing campaign. Not sure marketing will take it. Have some smile :)… Live is short.

Best, Oleg

Disclosure: I’m acknowledging, this is my late Aprl-1 fool post.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
13 March, 2013

Implementation of enterprise information systems is a long and painful process. It requires a lot of efforts, investments and planning....

18 March, 2013

Disruptive technologies and solutions. This is beloved topic by bloggers, analysts and vendors. We like to talk about how disruption...

21 January, 2011

During last two days I’ve been busy attending PLM Innovation Congress 2011 in London. This is a short statistic of...

25 January, 2017

To choose PLM is a difficult task. Usually it takes months and sometimes years. You wonder why it takes so...

22 September, 2014

The world is a scare place today. Every day we hear about different security problems – very large retail network...

13 July, 2010

I found the following presentation by Ouriel Ohayon very interesting. Please, take a look and make your impression. Apple Study:...

4 January, 2013

3D printing is still a narrow niche play zone. In my view, we are not going to see 3D printer...

3 July, 2015

Aras is probably doing something right. At least this is an immediate thought that comes to my mind when I...

19 October, 2011

Few days ago, I was talking about some interesting patterns of PLM and ERP implementation. In a nutshell, the integration...

Blogroll

To the top