A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How PLM Vendors Can Listen To Competitors?

How PLM Vendors Can Listen To Competitors?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
17 January, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Last week I had chance to read Forbes’s article (Listen To Competitors — Not Customers), which made me think more about competition in Product Lifecycle Management. I read this article few times, and, I think, found why I felt not comfortable with position of author. The definition of customers is simple. Those people or organizations which consume products your organization manufactures. If you think about new markets, it is very simple to identify who are that organization or people you need to talk to. However, with competition the situation is not as simple. The definition of competition is subjective. You can consider the specific company (or product domain) as a competitive, but in fact, this is false reality.

In my view, today’s situation on the PLM market characterized by a very small amount of vendors that fight on the lucrative space of the specific services. At the same time, mainstream adoption of PLM is still a very significant problem. For the last decade, number of companies playing on PDM/PLM market decreased due to competitive acquisitions. If you will be listening to the PLM marketing, you can be confused by similarity of offering and messages. So, to realize a potential listening to the competitors the process of competitor’s selection need to be much different and going beyond Gartner Magic Quadrant.

So, what is my conclusion today? Discovering multiple ideas surrounding Product Lifecycle Management, I found many times that customer’s perspective on technology and product positioning is quite different from mainstream marketing presentations. Thus, you can find something, I’d call “alternative” and not “competition” to PLM. So, with such correction, I think, PLM companies need to watch alternatives to their solutions- it will create more balanced view and will focus on the competitiveness and ways to provide value to customers.

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
31 August, 2017

For many years, selling PLM was a fascinating adventure. Tons of stories were published about marketing and sales tactics, selling...

14 August, 2022

Although many manufacturers still rely heavily on document-based Bill of Materials (BOM) Excel files, the days of these archaic systems...

22 December, 2011

After my publication PLM, Autodesk and Cloud Wars Club few days ago, I received few comments from my readers trying...

28 July, 2010

I read Microsoft Talked Open Data, Open Cloud and watched Microsoft’s Jean Paoli video. It seems to me, Microsoft is...

8 February, 2013

Data is a trending topic these days. Big Data is even fascinating. It made me think about the meaning of...

15 October, 2009

I’m continuing to explore a world of cloud for PLM. Today, I want to take and discuss a direction which...

21 February, 2018

Last two days I attended PI PLMx conference in Hamburg. It was a honor for me to become a chairman...

6 February, 2019

Engineering.com article A Solidworks user look at Onshape brought my PDM twisted mind again to what I call CAD version of Turgenev’s...

31 July, 2009

For the last weeks, I have chance to speak with few of my colleagues about PLM implementations and technologies in...

Blogroll

To the top