A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Do we need multi-faceted BOM compare?

Do we need multi-faceted BOM compare?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
10 July, 2009 | 2 min for reading

bom-compareThe following blog article by Anurag Batra drove my attention today – “Comparing BOM Structures: a multi-faceted need”. The author is asking if “BOM comparison” is needed function in the PLM system and especially interested in the “multi-faceted” Bill of Material comparison. He is asking these questions in the context of enhancements made in the new Agile 9.3. He wrote – “Most PDM, PLM and ERP systems offer the ability to compare Bills of Material structures side by side. Agile have had a BOM Comparison report for many years – it allowed for comparison of multiple BOM structures side by side. With 9.3, we’ve enhanced the report greatly – focusing on the use case of deep multi-level comparison between two BOM structures”. Later in this article Anurag explains new features, how possible to compare multiple levels of multiple release changes etc. According to him, Agile 9.3 version provides excellent features that improve the capability to compare Bill of Materials in multiple ways. I’ve been a bit confused in the end of Anurag’s post by his question to readers, how they actually compare BOMs and what can be possible use cases for newly introduced reports…

Here is my Think Tank question… Do we really want to compare the Bill of Materials? Except for the fact that we always excited by the features and capabilities of our software, I guess the comparison is a very complex task. Each time I’m trying to compare structures, I feel unsecured. To compare multi-level structures that include multiple changes is very complicated, in my view. I’d be very interested to see examples of multi-faceted BOM comparison Anurag is talking about…

Here is my view:
1.  Bill of Material comparison is a very complicated task.

2. Designers and Engineers are less interesting “to compare”, but more interesting to find the difference between two versions of designs of product structures.

3. Maybe we need to think about functions in our software that provide “results” and not put users in complicated scenarios of comparing multiple structures?

I’m looking forward to your responses and open discussion…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing a digital network-based platform that manages product data and connects manufacturers and their supply chain networksMy opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
18 April, 2025

Why fast-moving product development teams need a new playbook for PLM? Manufacturing industry is evolving and looking how to keep...

28 May, 2012

The following twitter message from @raykurland of TechniCom, NJ market research and consulting firm woke me up during the long Memorial...

27 April, 2021

It doesn’t matter what business you are in, the question about differentiation is coming up. We live in an extremely...

10 February, 2013

To predict future is tough. Not many people are trying to do so. Especially in tech. Companies are juggling with...

2 April, 2023

PLM Conferences are coming back in 2023 and I started to put them back on my calendar. You can watch...

19 May, 2017

Integration and connectivity was always one of the most important aspects of PLM deployment and implementations. It was never simple...

8 August, 2013

Cloud is going mainstream these days. It happens everywhere. It is hard to find a company or business today that...

19 December, 2014

Have you heard about collaborative economy? If you are not familiar with the term, it is a time to get...

29 November, 2016

PLM industry is in a full swing to promote new concepts – digital thread and digital twin. While digital term by itself...

Blogroll

To the top