A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

BIM Open Source – Stimulus for PLM?

BIM Open Source – Stimulus for PLM?
Oleg
Oleg
15 September, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Open source is trending. I think, Android success and some other OSS projects created some winds towards future open source adoption. In my view, companies are taking notes. I was reading Graphic Speak article Autodesk releases Revit IFC Explorter as open source.

Autodesk today released its Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) exporter for Revit as open source code. Going forward the code will be managed by a five-person committee, one of whom will be an Autodesk employee.

I’ve been writing about “open source” before. However, most of my posts were about PLM and Open Source. You can take a look on some of my previous blog posts – PLM Wood And Open Source Termites and PLM and Open Source Big Games. One of the key elements of every open source solution is a community. Therefore, I found the following passage is very important:

The Revit IFC exporter open source code is managed by a five-member steering committee composed of one Autodesk employee and four members of the AEC Building Information Modeling (BIM) community. The Revit IFC Exporter Open Source Committee is chaired by Emile Kfouri, BIM application development manager, Architecture, Engineering and Construction Solutions, Autodesk.

PLM Open Source Stimulus

I found BIM is more friendly with Open Source compared to PLM. I don’t have much experience in this space, therefore, wanted to ask my BIM blogging colleagues to close my educational gap related to some solutions I discovered such as BIM Server, Open Source BIM and maybe some others. However, I made a notice and think IFC is playing a significant role in helping to establish BIM Open Source. I think, some standards like STEP or maybe JT Open can play a similar role in PLM?

What is my conclusion? I think the dynamic between BIM and PLM Open source development can be interesting. Even if BIM and PLM are different from the business standpoint, I can see a similarity in some technological and product foundations. What is your take on this? I’m looking forward to hearing both PLM and BIM people here. Please, speak your mind.

Thanks, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
21 June, 2025

Earlier this week, I read a post by Andreas Lindenthal. He speaks about problems PLM can solve and he goes...

23 March, 2019

TGIF. It is a time to think about an everlasting topic – debates about PLM complexity. I was happy to...

17 August, 2016

Collecting data is a pervasive trend these days. 20 years ago people smiled when Google founders promised to index internet....

26 October, 2015

Historically, PLM products are well know for being complicated and hard to use. It has deep roots in the way...

24 April, 2013

Do you think Big Data and noSQL are the last and coolest trend in data world? No way. Software architects...

30 May, 2010

I read an interesting note from Autodesk Labs. Inventor 2011 now available for trials via the cloud. It made me...

25 August, 2010

Have you had a chance to see any PLM strategic presentation? I’m sure you did. You can find easy few...

19 May, 2015

Siemens PLM connection 2015 is taking place in Dallas this week. Thanks for Siemens PLM inviting me, I had a...

9 November, 2018

There is one topic that always drives discussion in CAD/PLM world. It is a question about data interoperability and standards....

Blogroll

To the top