A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

BIM Open Source – Stimulus for PLM?

BIM Open Source – Stimulus for PLM?
Oleg
Oleg
15 September, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Open source is trending. I think, Android success and some other OSS projects created some winds towards future open source adoption. In my view, companies are taking notes. I was reading Graphic Speak article Autodesk releases Revit IFC Explorter as open source.

Autodesk today released its Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) exporter for Revit as open source code. Going forward the code will be managed by a five-person committee, one of whom will be an Autodesk employee.

I’ve been writing about “open source” before. However, most of my posts were about PLM and Open Source. You can take a look on some of my previous blog posts – PLM Wood And Open Source Termites and PLM and Open Source Big Games. One of the key elements of every open source solution is a community. Therefore, I found the following passage is very important:

The Revit IFC exporter open source code is managed by a five-member steering committee composed of one Autodesk employee and four members of the AEC Building Information Modeling (BIM) community. The Revit IFC Exporter Open Source Committee is chaired by Emile Kfouri, BIM application development manager, Architecture, Engineering and Construction Solutions, Autodesk.

PLM Open Source Stimulus

I found BIM is more friendly with Open Source compared to PLM. I don’t have much experience in this space, therefore, wanted to ask my BIM blogging colleagues to close my educational gap related to some solutions I discovered such as BIM Server, Open Source BIM and maybe some others. However, I made a notice and think IFC is playing a significant role in helping to establish BIM Open Source. I think, some standards like STEP or maybe JT Open can play a similar role in PLM?

What is my conclusion? I think the dynamic between BIM and PLM Open source development can be interesting. Even if BIM and PLM are different from the business standpoint, I can see a similarity in some technological and product foundations. What is your take on this? I’m looking forward to hearing both PLM and BIM people here. Please, speak your mind.

Thanks, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
25 September, 2015

I had a chance to attend DFM Summit in Brooklyn, NY yesterday afternoon. More information and program can be found here....

17 October, 2025

TL;DRPLM is famous for enterprise customers, long sales cycles, and high sales costs. At the same time, if you read...

19 November, 2020

Autodesk University is one of my favorite events for many years. This year it is different. Usually, the event attended...

6 January, 2009

I think that staying in contact with your customers is the number one goal for all organizations today. And this...

12 August, 2012

If you follow news these days, you probably paid attention to Outlook.com – newcomers from Microsoft and “Gmail twin brother”....

28 February, 2015

I’ve been attending m3 Manufacturing meetup in Berlin earlier this week. It was a very interesting gathering of makers, hardware...

25 February, 2009

In one of the previous posts , I thought about how it would be possible to use a WIKI engine to...

14 January, 2020

Professional life is about priorities. And sometimes, choices are very tough and you have to say no. I’ve been invited...

7 September, 2015

Once upon a time, all my files lived on my computer. I was able to control it, backup and even...

Blogroll

To the top