A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

BIM Open Source – Stimulus for PLM?

BIM Open Source – Stimulus for PLM?
Oleg
Oleg
15 September, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Open source is trending. I think, Android success and some other OSS projects created some winds towards future open source adoption. In my view, companies are taking notes. I was reading Graphic Speak article Autodesk releases Revit IFC Explorter as open source.

Autodesk today released its Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) exporter for Revit as open source code. Going forward the code will be managed by a five-person committee, one of whom will be an Autodesk employee.

I’ve been writing about “open source” before. However, most of my posts were about PLM and Open Source. You can take a look on some of my previous blog posts – PLM Wood And Open Source Termites and PLM and Open Source Big Games. One of the key elements of every open source solution is a community. Therefore, I found the following passage is very important:

The Revit IFC exporter open source code is managed by a five-member steering committee composed of one Autodesk employee and four members of the AEC Building Information Modeling (BIM) community. The Revit IFC Exporter Open Source Committee is chaired by Emile Kfouri, BIM application development manager, Architecture, Engineering and Construction Solutions, Autodesk.

PLM Open Source Stimulus

I found BIM is more friendly with Open Source compared to PLM. I don’t have much experience in this space, therefore, wanted to ask my BIM blogging colleagues to close my educational gap related to some solutions I discovered such as BIM Server, Open Source BIM and maybe some others. However, I made a notice and think IFC is playing a significant role in helping to establish BIM Open Source. I think, some standards like STEP or maybe JT Open can play a similar role in PLM?

What is my conclusion? I think the dynamic between BIM and PLM Open source development can be interesting. Even if BIM and PLM are different from the business standpoint, I can see a similarity in some technological and product foundations. What is your take on this? I’m looking forward to hearing both PLM and BIM people here. Please, speak your mind.

Thanks, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
19 September, 2021

Data is a centerpiece of any business today and there is a growing concern among companies about protecting their data...

29 July, 2016

Unless you’re taking digital detox, you probably heard about big news in enterprise software world – Oracle buys Netsuite. The...

28 February, 2021

Monica Schnitger is asking a question about SaaS dominance in PLM following the PTC acquisition of Arena Solutions. Check her...

1 August, 2014

Cloud is one of the topics that I’m following on my blog for a long time. I can see lots...

22 July, 2014

Data is an essential part of every PLM implementation. It all starts from data – design, engineering, manufacturing, supply chain,...

1 May, 2015

Connectivity and information technologies are changing our lives. Think about your everyday experience – news, driving, communication, banking. It is...

27 April, 2017

“Connected” is a new magic buzzword. Everything is connected these days. The world is changing because of new ways to...

27 June, 2014

For me, Google is one of the symbols of simple software design. Therefore, Google developers event is always a good...

18 March, 2011

Collaboration is one of the most overused words in Product Lifecycle Management. Even outside of PLM world, this term creates...

Blogroll

To the top