A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

BIM Open Source – Stimulus for PLM?

BIM Open Source – Stimulus for PLM?
Oleg
Oleg
15 September, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Open source is trending. I think, Android success and some other OSS projects created some winds towards future open source adoption. In my view, companies are taking notes. I was reading Graphic Speak article Autodesk releases Revit IFC Explorter as open source.

Autodesk today released its Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) exporter for Revit as open source code. Going forward the code will be managed by a five-person committee, one of whom will be an Autodesk employee.

I’ve been writing about “open source” before. However, most of my posts were about PLM and Open Source. You can take a look on some of my previous blog posts – PLM Wood And Open Source Termites and PLM and Open Source Big Games. One of the key elements of every open source solution is a community. Therefore, I found the following passage is very important:

The Revit IFC exporter open source code is managed by a five-member steering committee composed of one Autodesk employee and four members of the AEC Building Information Modeling (BIM) community. The Revit IFC Exporter Open Source Committee is chaired by Emile Kfouri, BIM application development manager, Architecture, Engineering and Construction Solutions, Autodesk.

PLM Open Source Stimulus

I found BIM is more friendly with Open Source compared to PLM. I don’t have much experience in this space, therefore, wanted to ask my BIM blogging colleagues to close my educational gap related to some solutions I discovered such as BIM Server, Open Source BIM and maybe some others. However, I made a notice and think IFC is playing a significant role in helping to establish BIM Open Source. I think, some standards like STEP or maybe JT Open can play a similar role in PLM?

What is my conclusion? I think the dynamic between BIM and PLM Open source development can be interesting. Even if BIM and PLM are different from the business standpoint, I can see a similarity in some technological and product foundations. What is your take on this? I’m looking forward to hearing both PLM and BIM people here. Please, speak your mind.

Thanks, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
16 November, 2009

Reading over the weekend ZDNet post, “Why IT cannot seem to deliver measurable productivity”, I started to think about how...

21 April, 2021

During the last few days, I’ve been getting many questions about Autodesk and Upchain. Thanks to all my online and...

4 May, 2009

Over the past few months, I have seen an increased volume of discussions related to the connection between CAD/PDM/PLM space...

31 May, 2025

Last week, I had the privilege of attending and speaking at the Share PLM 2025 Summit in Jerez de la...

14 January, 2019

Hello… This is Oleg with Beyond PLM and my video blog about Bill of Materials :). If you missed my earlier...

19 November, 2010

I want to learn more about Microsoft’s strategies these days. The “big PC” is preparing to become the biggest supplier...

4 September, 2012

I’m about to start my journey back from Israel to Boston after a short family vacation break. Below is probably...

5 July, 2009

Interesting prompt – Microsoft published white paper – Social Computing in Enterprise. Quite interesting reading about Microsoft’s vision of collaboration...

19 October, 2011

Few days ago, I was talking about some interesting patterns of PLM and ERP implementation. In a nutshell, the integration...

Blogroll

To the top