A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

BIM Open Source – Stimulus for PLM?

BIM Open Source – Stimulus for PLM?
Oleg
Oleg
15 September, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Open source is trending. I think, Android success and some other OSS projects created some winds towards future open source adoption. In my view, companies are taking notes. I was reading Graphic Speak article Autodesk releases Revit IFC Explorter as open source.

Autodesk today released its Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) exporter for Revit as open source code. Going forward the code will be managed by a five-person committee, one of whom will be an Autodesk employee.

I’ve been writing about “open source” before. However, most of my posts were about PLM and Open Source. You can take a look on some of my previous blog posts – PLM Wood And Open Source Termites and PLM and Open Source Big Games. One of the key elements of every open source solution is a community. Therefore, I found the following passage is very important:

The Revit IFC exporter open source code is managed by a five-member steering committee composed of one Autodesk employee and four members of the AEC Building Information Modeling (BIM) community. The Revit IFC Exporter Open Source Committee is chaired by Emile Kfouri, BIM application development manager, Architecture, Engineering and Construction Solutions, Autodesk.

PLM Open Source Stimulus

I found BIM is more friendly with Open Source compared to PLM. I don’t have much experience in this space, therefore, wanted to ask my BIM blogging colleagues to close my educational gap related to some solutions I discovered such as BIM Server, Open Source BIM and maybe some others. However, I made a notice and think IFC is playing a significant role in helping to establish BIM Open Source. I think, some standards like STEP or maybe JT Open can play a similar role in PLM?

What is my conclusion? I think the dynamic between BIM and PLM Open source development can be interesting. Even if BIM and PLM are different from the business standpoint, I can see a similarity in some technological and product foundations. What is your take on this? I’m looking forward to hearing both PLM and BIM people here. Please, speak your mind.

Thanks, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
7 January, 2009

When I posted about my Dream PLM Technologies for 2009 , one of them was  Persistent Content. In today’s word, I...

6 January, 2012

It was a long time I didn’t talk about process management. The importance of process management is obvious. One of...

22 July, 2009

I’m looking on SolidJott plug-in for SolidWorks. My opinion, that social tools need to be integrated into CAD environment. The...

25 November, 2017

I like Friday evenings. It is a time to relax and make some unusual reading of something completely outside of...

25 April, 2026

Why the PLM industry is converging on the same problem This article is a summary of thoughts that have been...

29 June, 2026

On Monday, a group of us will sit down for Part 2 of the Future of PLM BOM debate. Michael...

26 May, 2010

PLM is very focused on what we call content. All aspects of product design, engineering, manufacturing are around the content....

30 September, 2010

We are in the middle of a very interesting process of digitalizing our life. We are moving more and more...

17 June, 2018

Last week, I’ve got invited to join Hexagon Live event in Las Vegas. If you’re following my tweets, you probably...

Blogroll

To the top