A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

BIM Open Source – Stimulus for PLM?

BIM Open Source – Stimulus for PLM?
Oleg
Oleg
15 September, 2011 | 2 min for reading

Open source is trending. I think, Android success and some other OSS projects created some winds towards future open source adoption. In my view, companies are taking notes. I was reading Graphic Speak article Autodesk releases Revit IFC Explorter as open source.

Autodesk today released its Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) exporter for Revit as open source code. Going forward the code will be managed by a five-person committee, one of whom will be an Autodesk employee.

I’ve been writing about “open source” before. However, most of my posts were about PLM and Open Source. You can take a look on some of my previous blog posts – PLM Wood And Open Source Termites and PLM and Open Source Big Games. One of the key elements of every open source solution is a community. Therefore, I found the following passage is very important:

The Revit IFC exporter open source code is managed by a five-member steering committee composed of one Autodesk employee and four members of the AEC Building Information Modeling (BIM) community. The Revit IFC Exporter Open Source Committee is chaired by Emile Kfouri, BIM application development manager, Architecture, Engineering and Construction Solutions, Autodesk.

PLM Open Source Stimulus

I found BIM is more friendly with Open Source compared to PLM. I don’t have much experience in this space, therefore, wanted to ask my BIM blogging colleagues to close my educational gap related to some solutions I discovered such as BIM Server, Open Source BIM and maybe some others. However, I made a notice and think IFC is playing a significant role in helping to establish BIM Open Source. I think, some standards like STEP or maybe JT Open can play a similar role in PLM?

What is my conclusion? I think the dynamic between BIM and PLM Open source development can be interesting. Even if BIM and PLM are different from the business standpoint, I can see a similarity in some technological and product foundations. What is your take on this? I’m looking forward to hearing both PLM and BIM people here. Please, speak your mind.

Thanks, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
28 October, 2016

Manufacturing companies are learning about the value of data assets. For the last few years, we have seen a tremendous interest...

21 May, 2020

PLM marketing and strategy these days are shifting towards everything “digital”. The number of “digital” articles is growing. While selling...

2 November, 2010

I was reading CloudAve yesterday. The post named – IT: Become Relevant or Die. Read this blog and make your...

1 December, 2009

The following NYT article drove my attention yesterday – Open Source as a Model for Business is Elusive. I already...

27 November, 2013

Security is one of the most fundamental things in enterprise systems. If you think about every enterprise system as a...

24 March, 2021

Hexagon’s Article The Digital Thread Comes to BIM brings an interesting perspective on the industrial development of construction projects and...

6 February, 2009

Let’s start with a strange question – how many “Ps” are there in PLM? Frankly, speaking, I don’t know. I...

7 August, 2022

I was catching up on some of the social media reading over the weekend. My attention was caught by Deloitte’s...

24 January, 2011

SolidWorks World 2011 is about to start, and I’m preparing to learn about what SolidWorks and partners are up to...

Blogroll

To the top