A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Part numbers and External Classification Schemas

Part numbers and External Classification Schemas
Oleg
Oleg
7 February, 2012 | 2 min for reading

I want to talk about Part Numbers. Yes, Part Numbers, again… My previous blog – Part Numbering and the future of identification raised few interesting conversations. So, I decided to open a Pandora box of part numbering. The formal trigger for this conversation was Arena Solutions blog – Three consideration when choosing Part Numbering schema for you. Here is passage that actually made me think about the fact we are doing something wrong:

Choosing a part numbering scheme is one of the more important decisions you make as you move toward production… Once you commit to a part numbering scheme, you are married to it for a long time to come, so you need to be 100% sure it is nimble enough to evolve and scale right along with you...

It sounded like a Catholic marriage. Once you decided about part numbering, you are done for many years. The same Arena’s blog post mentioned some external tools you can use to generate part numbers – part-numbering.com and partnumber.com.

The idea that stroke me earlier today is that most of the companies are using “smart Part Numbers” in order to simplify part search, re-use and, even more fundamentally, classification. Type of part, organization, suppliers – these are only small elements of “an intelligent part number”. What if some “smart applications” are available that can add classification information to existing part numbers in order to enrich (actually to annotate) Part Number identification. These tools can be web-based and even applied to existing data in the company.

What is my conclusion? We need to re-think some very fundamental elements and concepts of product development, PDM and PLM. The ability to enrich data without building lots of sophistication in the Part Numbering is something that can make PDM / PLM systems more flexible and drive cost of changes down. I’d be interested how to support it in existing PDM/PLM systems. Not sure if it is a simple task. However, I’m curious if new PLM software coming tomorrow to market from companies like Autodesk will have a different set of capabilities to solve the problem of Part Numbering and identification. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
25 May, 2010

The following article Will Social Revive Interest In BPM… drove my attention yesterday. A very interesting quote made me think...

13 May, 2015

I’ve been reading a blog Getting PLM right: no one answer by Monica Schnitger. It is a slick writeup started from...

10 February, 2009

Organizations today are looking for ways to improve their performance. I think that the right tools (or right technologies) can...

5 December, 2016

The stories about disruption are popular in today’s media. Uber for X. Airbnb for Y. You probably heard it many...

4 October, 2012

During the last two days I attended Autodesk University Russia in Moscow (AU.RU). This year event got a status of...

15 March, 2016

Innovation platform is a new name in the competition of PLM and engineering software. The message is widely supported by analysts...

26 October, 2014

One of the most prominent marketing slogans in PLM and enterprise software is related to “replacement of Excel”. I have...

10 December, 2008

  Microsoft Excel is extremely popular. In many cases people are very comfortable working with product data in Excel files....

23 October, 2019

Digital Transformation is in the air. Every company these days is transforming itself into a future digital universe. There are...

Blogroll

To the top