A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Part numbers and External Classification Schemas

Part numbers and External Classification Schemas
Oleg
Oleg
7 February, 2012 | 2 min for reading

I want to talk about Part Numbers. Yes, Part Numbers, again… My previous blog – Part Numbering and the future of identification raised few interesting conversations. So, I decided to open a Pandora box of part numbering. The formal trigger for this conversation was Arena Solutions blog – Three consideration when choosing Part Numbering schema for you. Here is passage that actually made me think about the fact we are doing something wrong:

Choosing a part numbering scheme is one of the more important decisions you make as you move toward production… Once you commit to a part numbering scheme, you are married to it for a long time to come, so you need to be 100% sure it is nimble enough to evolve and scale right along with you...

It sounded like a Catholic marriage. Once you decided about part numbering, you are done for many years. The same Arena’s blog post mentioned some external tools you can use to generate part numbers – part-numbering.com and partnumber.com.

The idea that stroke me earlier today is that most of the companies are using “smart Part Numbers” in order to simplify part search, re-use and, even more fundamentally, classification. Type of part, organization, suppliers – these are only small elements of “an intelligent part number”. What if some “smart applications” are available that can add classification information to existing part numbers in order to enrich (actually to annotate) Part Number identification. These tools can be web-based and even applied to existing data in the company.

What is my conclusion? We need to re-think some very fundamental elements and concepts of product development, PDM and PLM. The ability to enrich data without building lots of sophistication in the Part Numbering is something that can make PDM / PLM systems more flexible and drive cost of changes down. I’d be interested how to support it in existing PDM/PLM systems. Not sure if it is a simple task. However, I’m curious if new PLM software coming tomorrow to market from companies like Autodesk will have a different set of capabilities to solve the problem of Part Numbering and identification. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
6 November, 2014

Earlier this week I talked about future of ubiquitous CAD cloud drives. My hunch CAD and other engineering software companies...

14 July, 2010

What is the proper definition of PLM? This is a simple and complex question at the same time… Recently, I...

4 May, 2015

PDM. Product Data Management was one of the topics engineers are really hating. It was always about slow implementations, complex...

22 September, 2011

Things are busy for me this week. It is mostly because of Autodesk Forum in Moscow. I’ve been invited to...

28 May, 2009

After starting a massive Excel discussion last week and continuing this week, I got a lot of comments that I...

30 November, 2020

The news from last week – Dassault Systemes, one of the leading PLM vendors is acquiring NuoDB. The formal press...

31 December, 2012

I’ve been out of active blogging for the last week because of Autodesk week of rest. It is a perfect...

10 February, 2013

Dogfooding or “eating your dog food” is a fascinating topic. It came to us from computer software company. This slang...

26 April, 2017

Manufacturing is under going tremendous transformation process. Build to order, speed and engagement with consumer are most important competitive factors....

Blogroll

To the top