A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Part numbers and External Classification Schemas

Part numbers and External Classification Schemas
Oleg
Oleg
7 February, 2012 | 2 min for reading

I want to talk about Part Numbers. Yes, Part Numbers, again… My previous blog – Part Numbering and the future of identification raised few interesting conversations. So, I decided to open a Pandora box of part numbering. The formal trigger for this conversation was Arena Solutions blog – Three consideration when choosing Part Numbering schema for you. Here is passage that actually made me think about the fact we are doing something wrong:

Choosing a part numbering scheme is one of the more important decisions you make as you move toward production… Once you commit to a part numbering scheme, you are married to it for a long time to come, so you need to be 100% sure it is nimble enough to evolve and scale right along with you...

It sounded like a Catholic marriage. Once you decided about part numbering, you are done for many years. The same Arena’s blog post mentioned some external tools you can use to generate part numbers – part-numbering.com and partnumber.com.

The idea that stroke me earlier today is that most of the companies are using “smart Part Numbers” in order to simplify part search, re-use and, even more fundamentally, classification. Type of part, organization, suppliers – these are only small elements of “an intelligent part number”. What if some “smart applications” are available that can add classification information to existing part numbers in order to enrich (actually to annotate) Part Number identification. These tools can be web-based and even applied to existing data in the company.

What is my conclusion? We need to re-think some very fundamental elements and concepts of product development, PDM and PLM. The ability to enrich data without building lots of sophistication in the Part Numbering is something that can make PDM / PLM systems more flexible and drive cost of changes down. I’d be interested how to support it in existing PDM/PLM systems. Not sure if it is a simple task. However, I’m curious if new PLM software coming tomorrow to market from companies like Autodesk will have a different set of capabilities to solve the problem of Part Numbering and identification. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
28 April, 2017

To speak about value of PLM is a tough job. I did it many time in my previous life –...

28 November, 2021

Earlier this week, I shared my thoughts about connected PLM and how the organization of a semantic data layer can...

1 March, 2021

There are two types of CAD revolutions (features and platforms). The first create something completely new that was not possible...

27 November, 2017

I learned that today was Cyber Monday. The internet was overblown by deals and promotions. I checked few websites including...

30 November, 2024

I started my blogging journey back in 2008. In those days, there was huge excitement about the capabilities of platforms...

23 September, 2011

I wanted to talk about Windows 8 today. Despite lots of talks we had about Macs, iPads and web during...

28 August, 2009

Another prompt today. Reading the following  article “Will Social Media kill email?”. What I see is an examples of companies...

28 August, 2013

Are you familiar with 1% internet rule? It is also called 90-9-1 principle. According to this rule, only 1% of...

6 February, 2015

Cloud computing is changing a world around us. CAD and engineering applications are not exception. It has been already five...

Blogroll

To the top