A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Part numbers and External Classification Schemas

Part numbers and External Classification Schemas
Oleg
Oleg
7 February, 2012 | 2 min for reading

I want to talk about Part Numbers. Yes, Part Numbers, again… My previous blog – Part Numbering and the future of identification raised few interesting conversations. So, I decided to open a Pandora box of part numbering. The formal trigger for this conversation was Arena Solutions blog – Three consideration when choosing Part Numbering schema for you. Here is passage that actually made me think about the fact we are doing something wrong:

Choosing a part numbering scheme is one of the more important decisions you make as you move toward production… Once you commit to a part numbering scheme, you are married to it for a long time to come, so you need to be 100% sure it is nimble enough to evolve and scale right along with you...

It sounded like a Catholic marriage. Once you decided about part numbering, you are done for many years. The same Arena’s blog post mentioned some external tools you can use to generate part numbers – part-numbering.com and partnumber.com.

The idea that stroke me earlier today is that most of the companies are using “smart Part Numbers” in order to simplify part search, re-use and, even more fundamentally, classification. Type of part, organization, suppliers – these are only small elements of “an intelligent part number”. What if some “smart applications” are available that can add classification information to existing part numbers in order to enrich (actually to annotate) Part Number identification. These tools can be web-based and even applied to existing data in the company.

What is my conclusion? We need to re-think some very fundamental elements and concepts of product development, PDM and PLM. The ability to enrich data without building lots of sophistication in the Part Numbering is something that can make PDM / PLM systems more flexible and drive cost of changes down. I’d be interested how to support it in existing PDM/PLM systems. Not sure if it is a simple task. However, I’m curious if new PLM software coming tomorrow to market from companies like Autodesk will have a different set of capabilities to solve the problem of Part Numbering and identification. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
27 May, 2021

Unless you lived under a rock for the last year, you should know about the Siemens and SAP partnership. I...

18 May, 2025

If there’s one thing I’ve learned watching engineering software evolve, it’s this: adoption follows familiarity. The user adoption process is...

12 October, 2016

I had a chance to attend the first Siemens PLM components event in Boston. Navigate to this link to learn more about the...

29 May, 2009

I’ve been playing with Microsoft Vine Beta last few days. For me this is sort of contextual collaboration. You can put...

11 March, 2017

Almost 10 years ago, Gartner defined IT obsolescence management as major emerging issue. Here is a passage from old the old article...

23 October, 2011

I want to talk about an interesting segment of cloud technologies – cloud SQL Database. For the last months, I’ve...

28 April, 2015

The last decade changed  many things in our everyday life. It is hard to imagine, but just think about few...

16 February, 2025

Many years ago, I developed applications for AutoCAD to support product development process and analyze data and customer feedback in...

15 January, 2020

My last week’s OpenBOM article How to Manage EBOM and MBOM () triggered a good discussion on LinkedIn and offline,...

Blogroll

To the top