A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Part numbers and External Classification Schemas

Part numbers and External Classification Schemas
Oleg
Oleg
7 February, 2012 | 2 min for reading

I want to talk about Part Numbers. Yes, Part Numbers, again… My previous blog – Part Numbering and the future of identification raised few interesting conversations. So, I decided to open a Pandora box of part numbering. The formal trigger for this conversation was Arena Solutions blog – Three consideration when choosing Part Numbering schema for you. Here is passage that actually made me think about the fact we are doing something wrong:

Choosing a part numbering scheme is one of the more important decisions you make as you move toward production… Once you commit to a part numbering scheme, you are married to it for a long time to come, so you need to be 100% sure it is nimble enough to evolve and scale right along with you...

It sounded like a Catholic marriage. Once you decided about part numbering, you are done for many years. The same Arena’s blog post mentioned some external tools you can use to generate part numbers – part-numbering.com and partnumber.com.

The idea that stroke me earlier today is that most of the companies are using “smart Part Numbers” in order to simplify part search, re-use and, even more fundamentally, classification. Type of part, organization, suppliers – these are only small elements of “an intelligent part number”. What if some “smart applications” are available that can add classification information to existing part numbers in order to enrich (actually to annotate) Part Number identification. These tools can be web-based and even applied to existing data in the company.

What is my conclusion? We need to re-think some very fundamental elements and concepts of product development, PDM and PLM. The ability to enrich data without building lots of sophistication in the Part Numbering is something that can make PDM / PLM systems more flexible and drive cost of changes down. I’d be interested how to support it in existing PDM/PLM systems. Not sure if it is a simple task. However, I’m curious if new PLM software coming tomorrow to market from companies like Autodesk will have a different set of capabilities to solve the problem of Part Numbering and identification. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
25 March, 2019

During the last decade, we’ve seen the establishment of new business models in software. I checked my blog about future...

27 March, 2009

Continuing the discussion about cloud-based implementation of PLM, I started to think about the relationship between current PLM products and...

30 October, 2012

Last week I attended PLM Innovation event in Atlanta. If you haven’t had a chance to follow my blog last...

3 May, 2013

(Updated with some modification. May 3, 2013 @9:42a) In my yesterday post, I’ve been talking about PDM software, obvious value...

28 August, 2014

Continue the topic of efficient communication started yesterday about future of the email for engineers, I want to speak about...

4 September, 2013

Speak to people about PLM and they will tell you about CAD design, BOMs, processes, ECOs, collaboration and other similar...

6 April, 2012

One year ago, I posted – PLM and Post-PC era. It is interesting to read back and think about the...

18 December, 2014

Few months ago, I posted about latest development of Kenesto cloud data management solutions – Kenesto revamp: does it change...

7 January, 2015

There are lot of changes in manufacturing eco-system these days. You probably heard about many of them. Changes are coming...

Blogroll

To the top