A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Multi-CAD and PDM: Dead Lock?

Multi-CAD and PDM: Dead Lock?
Oleg
Oleg
17 February, 2012 | 2 min for reading

This post was provoked by twitter conversation between me, Jonathan Scott of Razorleaf and Brian Roepke of Autodesk. Let me give you a context. During SolidWorks World general session yesterday, Jonathan commented about coming SolidWorks EPDM integration with DraftSight – free CAD software for your DWG files.  I thought, it might be beneficial to have DraftSight integration with Autodesk Vault. However, it appears to be a mistake. Watch that…

This conversation made me think again about what happens in the space of integration of product data management products and design software. Time ago, I posted – Immersive CAD management: is it the CAD / PDM future? Another post related to the same topic was – Back to basics: Multi-CAD and PLM. Last year, I posted CAD, PDM and PLM diversity. What I found common between all these cases is that I can see more and more stable bundles between CAD and PDM systems.

I can see an increased demand for better data-management functionality in CAD systems. The integration of data-management applications increased over the past 2-3 years. Vendors started to think about PDM functionality like revision management and vaulting as a standard function in CAD applications. Dassault V6 took this process even future and introduced CATIA V6 bundled with ENOVIA server.

In my view, CAD-PDM integration played a significant role in the first wave of broad PDM adoption. Multi-CAD support was (and still is) considered as an important function of PDM (and sometimes even PLM) system. To support heterogeneous environment, pure play PDM/PLM vendors must include multi-CAD support. It happened almost to all vendors in PDM/PLM space. On the opposite side, CAD/PDM vendors decided to strength their bundles and prefer to integrate data-management systems only with their own CAD systems. In my view, Multi-CAD integration is a painful issue for pure-play PDM/PLM vendors like Arena, Aras and future others. The complexity of CAD integration with PDM and PLM systems create a significant competitive advantage for CAD vendors to bundle their own PDMs right. At the same time, PDM providers from CAD vendors are less interested to provide support for “non-home-based” CAD systems.

What is my conclusion? I can see a certain dead-lock between the need for multi-CAD PDM systems and interest of CAD/PDM vendors to protect their business. Customers are demanding PDM systems like TeamCenter, Autodesk Vault, SolidWorks EPDM to support Multi-CAD features. However, it looks more and more like a dead-lock. PDM system will be embedded into CAD environment and will become part of the whole design environment. It doesn’t mean new innovative companies won’t try to break this dead-lock. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

[Update]. I keep open conversation with participants of this tweet-chat. You can expect some updates about the topic very soon.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
22 January, 2011

I’m still digesting a huge amount of information I learned from PLM Innovation Congress earlier this week in London. However,...

7 June, 2011

I want to talk about the topic, which is actually is not very new – revisions. I was reading Autodesk...

16 June, 2016

I’m attending Autodesk Forge DevCon these days in San Francisco. This is first ever pure Development Conference. Autodesk is making...

5 May, 2024

I wrote an article about 5 Opportunities and 5 Obstacles in Engineering Digital Transformation. In the article I shared my...

1 July, 2009

I want to discuss Enterprise 2.0. This term started to be popular during the last two-three years and stands for...

22 May, 2009

Look on this blog post –3D Warehouse from Google. Does it make sense in context of what CAD/PLM vendors are...

26 July, 2017

Software is eating the world. And products that we know in the past as purely mechanical, today have strong dependencies...

25 May, 2018

I remember CEO of one large  company saying that he is not afraid of competition from usual suspects – large...

5 May, 2010

User experience is important. It comes with all cool gadgets, Web 2.0 websites and iPhone apps. I think, people started...

Blogroll

To the top