A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM: Share Data or Die

PLM: Share Data or Die
Oleg
Oleg
22 January, 2011 | 2 min for reading

I’m still digesting a huge amount of information I learned from PLM Innovation Congress earlier this week in London. However, there is one trend that I can identify that struck me as a major one coming across all presentations and talks. I can call it “integrate and share” trend. The problem of integration and share of data is not new in manufacturing organization. The need for integration of various elements of data for product development, manufacturing and supply chain is clear. Software vendors and customers are working for on this for years. However, something new happens now that allow me to have a fresh look on this.

Integration Processes

The sound of integration needs is very loud, and you are able to see it in presentations. I put few examples of pictures I made during the event to show how customers explain their critical business issues related to integration of data and processes in organizations. In a nutshell, inability to provide smooth integration prevents streamlining of organizational processes. It appears in communication between engineering and manufacturing, sales and production, support and sales.

Share Data

The need to share data is obvious. However, data sharing was never realized in an easy way. There are multiple reasons for that. Some of them are including the nature of people (keep my data close to me), company organization (departments, hierarchy, etc.) and competition between vendors (lock-in data inside of proprietary formats and data structures). At the same the value of data sharing is obvious. Organizations are losing money, projects are going out of schedules just because of that. PLM aimed to solve this problem during the past decade. I have to note a significant success in multiple implementations I had a chance to see. I personally participated in some of them. However, the ability to share data efficiently is still more science that ordinary process.

What is my conclusion? The need to integrate and share data is urgent. However, the way organizations are doing it, reminds me space shuttle programs. There is a need to downgrade and simplify these integration efforts to become more similar to transatlantic flights or even car trips. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
23 October, 2013

Technology space is good about inventing new jobs, titles and responsibilities. Until now, we knew about CEO, COO, CIO… The...

14 May, 2015

CAD files. Everyone who is dealing with design and engineering is familiar with this type of data. Large files, many...

18 May, 2025

If there’s one thing I’ve learned watching engineering software evolve, it’s this: adoption follows familiarity. The user adoption process is...

3 August, 2010

Collaboration is a widely used term, and I found it sometime even overused. Collaborative development, Collaborative PDM, Collaborative PLM, Collaborative...

15 December, 2013

PDM is not a new domain in enterprise, engineering and manufacturing software. It might sounds like PDM functions are clearly...

14 July, 2015

Back to my trip to Develop3D Live conference earlier this year, I shared my thoughts about future of cloud competition....

5 October, 2010

The following blog article drove my attention yesterday: CAD File Management ≠ PLM. The short blog post published by Peter...

30 October, 2009

This week was signed by a significant event – Dassault Systems announced intent to acquire IBM’s PLM Software distribution activities....

23 November, 2025

The last two years have reshaped the language of software development with the introduction of AI into our lives. It...

Blogroll

To the top