A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM: Share Data or Die

PLM: Share Data or Die
Oleg
Oleg
22 January, 2011 | 2 min for reading

I’m still digesting a huge amount of information I learned from PLM Innovation Congress earlier this week in London. However, there is one trend that I can identify that struck me as a major one coming across all presentations and talks. I can call it “integrate and share” trend. The problem of integration and share of data is not new in manufacturing organization. The need for integration of various elements of data for product development, manufacturing and supply chain is clear. Software vendors and customers are working for on this for years. However, something new happens now that allow me to have a fresh look on this.

Integration Processes

The sound of integration needs is very loud, and you are able to see it in presentations. I put few examples of pictures I made during the event to show how customers explain their critical business issues related to integration of data and processes in organizations. In a nutshell, inability to provide smooth integration prevents streamlining of organizational processes. It appears in communication between engineering and manufacturing, sales and production, support and sales.

Share Data

The need to share data is obvious. However, data sharing was never realized in an easy way. There are multiple reasons for that. Some of them are including the nature of people (keep my data close to me), company organization (departments, hierarchy, etc.) and competition between vendors (lock-in data inside of proprietary formats and data structures). At the same the value of data sharing is obvious. Organizations are losing money, projects are going out of schedules just because of that. PLM aimed to solve this problem during the past decade. I have to note a significant success in multiple implementations I had a chance to see. I personally participated in some of them. However, the ability to share data efficiently is still more science that ordinary process.

What is my conclusion? The need to integrate and share data is urgent. However, the way organizations are doing it, reminds me space shuttle programs. There is a need to downgrade and simplify these integration efforts to become more similar to transatlantic flights or even car trips. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
14 June, 2026

Last week, I attended the first PTC Next 2026 event in Chicago. The event is part of a new  PTC...

24 February, 2014

I think Facebook buying WhatsApp for $19B was a refreshing experience for everybody. For the last week, I’ve got tsunami...

17 May, 2019

Everyone speaks about the platforms these days. The word “platform” is overused, but all PLM vendors have started to use...

9 November, 2009

In the past, I had chance to write about Google Wave (GW). Lots of interest coming around everything related to...

7 February, 2019

How many times you stuck in PLM meeting by saying “What I actually mean is… “. PLM has one big...

3 December, 2023

In today’s fast-paced business landscape, digital transformation is a buzzword that’s hard to escape. Many companies are reevaluating their processes...

28 November, 2021

Earlier this week, I shared my thoughts about connected PLM and how the organization of a semantic data layer can...

17 September, 2010

I’ve been presenting on Technia PLM Innovation Forum in Stockholm early this week. My presentation shows how to get into...

23 May, 2018

IoT is PLM. Remember my blog from a year ago? It was a message from PTC LiveWorx last year by...

Blogroll

To the top