A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM: Share Data or Die

PLM: Share Data or Die
Oleg
Oleg
22 January, 2011 | 2 min for reading

I’m still digesting a huge amount of information I learned from PLM Innovation Congress earlier this week in London. However, there is one trend that I can identify that struck me as a major one coming across all presentations and talks. I can call it “integrate and share” trend. The problem of integration and share of data is not new in manufacturing organization. The need for integration of various elements of data for product development, manufacturing and supply chain is clear. Software vendors and customers are working for on this for years. However, something new happens now that allow me to have a fresh look on this.

Integration Processes

The sound of integration needs is very loud, and you are able to see it in presentations. I put few examples of pictures I made during the event to show how customers explain their critical business issues related to integration of data and processes in organizations. In a nutshell, inability to provide smooth integration prevents streamlining of organizational processes. It appears in communication between engineering and manufacturing, sales and production, support and sales.

Share Data

The need to share data is obvious. However, data sharing was never realized in an easy way. There are multiple reasons for that. Some of them are including the nature of people (keep my data close to me), company organization (departments, hierarchy, etc.) and competition between vendors (lock-in data inside of proprietary formats and data structures). At the same the value of data sharing is obvious. Organizations are losing money, projects are going out of schedules just because of that. PLM aimed to solve this problem during the past decade. I have to note a significant success in multiple implementations I had a chance to see. I personally participated in some of them. However, the ability to share data efficiently is still more science that ordinary process.

What is my conclusion? The need to integrate and share data is urgent. However, the way organizations are doing it, reminds me space shuttle programs. There is a need to downgrade and simplify these integration efforts to become more similar to transatlantic flights or even car trips. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
1 November, 2019

Cloud technologies made huge progress in the last ten years in engineering and manufacturing companies. Back in 2010. You might...

28 April, 2011

What do you think is the most hard thing in everything we do? This month for me was overloaded by...

11 October, 2019

Yesterday evening I attended the first Onshape Boston User Group meeting. The meeting was organized in the Onshape office in...

19 August, 2010

One of the interesting trends in PLM is growing amount of vertical integrations between components of PLM portfolio. The following...

25 June, 2010

When you talk to a sales person from one of the PLM companies, you for sure will be exposed to...

6 October, 2009

What I want to discuss today is PLM Best Practices. Frankly saying, my thoughts about the topic were accelerated by...

30 August, 2025

It’s a long holiday weekend here in the U.S., so let’s have some fun. Thanks to Brion Carrol (II) for...

28 July, 2016

For the last year, I had chance to talk many manufacturing companies in range from small hardware startups to large...

11 July, 2011

Autodesk and PLM. Do you think these two words have something in common? I had a chance to discuss this...

Blogroll

To the top