A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM: Share Data or Die

PLM: Share Data or Die
Oleg
Oleg
22 January, 2011 | 2 min for reading

I’m still digesting a huge amount of information I learned from PLM Innovation Congress earlier this week in London. However, there is one trend that I can identify that struck me as a major one coming across all presentations and talks. I can call it “integrate and share” trend. The problem of integration and share of data is not new in manufacturing organization. The need for integration of various elements of data for product development, manufacturing and supply chain is clear. Software vendors and customers are working for on this for years. However, something new happens now that allow me to have a fresh look on this.

Integration Processes

The sound of integration needs is very loud, and you are able to see it in presentations. I put few examples of pictures I made during the event to show how customers explain their critical business issues related to integration of data and processes in organizations. In a nutshell, inability to provide smooth integration prevents streamlining of organizational processes. It appears in communication between engineering and manufacturing, sales and production, support and sales.

Share Data

The need to share data is obvious. However, data sharing was never realized in an easy way. There are multiple reasons for that. Some of them are including the nature of people (keep my data close to me), company organization (departments, hierarchy, etc.) and competition between vendors (lock-in data inside of proprietary formats and data structures). At the same the value of data sharing is obvious. Organizations are losing money, projects are going out of schedules just because of that. PLM aimed to solve this problem during the past decade. I have to note a significant success in multiple implementations I had a chance to see. I personally participated in some of them. However, the ability to share data efficiently is still more science that ordinary process.

What is my conclusion? The need to integrate and share data is urgent. However, the way organizations are doing it, reminds me space shuttle programs. There is a need to downgrade and simplify these integration efforts to become more similar to transatlantic flights or even car trips. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
20 June, 2016

Cloud applications are getting better these days. However, most of existing mainstream engineering applications are still using files to store...

15 March, 2016

Innovation platform is a new name in the competition of PLM and engineering software. The message is widely supported by analysts...

20 May, 2009

I think language is one of the barriers for successful collaboration. Therefore, I’m really excited about a new feature in...

20 September, 2018

Digital Thread was one of the top topics discussed earlier this week at ConX18 – a symposium organized by Institute...

12 July, 2016

It usually takes time to implement PLM system. One of the reasons for that is heavy customization and adaptations of...

9 December, 2014

Mobile PLM is one of the topics I’m following on my blog. You probably remember my post – How PLM...

26 January, 2010

I had chance to read CIMData paper figured out interesting facts related to the future trajectory of Autodesk as a...

24 March, 2016

Collaboration is one of these magic words that often used by software vendors to explain value proposition of PDM and...

22 October, 2020

Digital Twin is at the peak of inflated expectation according to ResearchGate publication and it keeps bringing topics for discussion....

Blogroll

To the top