A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM: Share Data or Die

PLM: Share Data or Die
Oleg
Oleg
22 January, 2011 | 2 min for reading

I’m still digesting a huge amount of information I learned from PLM Innovation Congress earlier this week in London. However, there is one trend that I can identify that struck me as a major one coming across all presentations and talks. I can call it “integrate and share” trend. The problem of integration and share of data is not new in manufacturing organization. The need for integration of various elements of data for product development, manufacturing and supply chain is clear. Software vendors and customers are working for on this for years. However, something new happens now that allow me to have a fresh look on this.

Integration Processes

The sound of integration needs is very loud, and you are able to see it in presentations. I put few examples of pictures I made during the event to show how customers explain their critical business issues related to integration of data and processes in organizations. In a nutshell, inability to provide smooth integration prevents streamlining of organizational processes. It appears in communication between engineering and manufacturing, sales and production, support and sales.

Share Data

The need to share data is obvious. However, data sharing was never realized in an easy way. There are multiple reasons for that. Some of them are including the nature of people (keep my data close to me), company organization (departments, hierarchy, etc.) and competition between vendors (lock-in data inside of proprietary formats and data structures). At the same the value of data sharing is obvious. Organizations are losing money, projects are going out of schedules just because of that. PLM aimed to solve this problem during the past decade. I have to note a significant success in multiple implementations I had a chance to see. I personally participated in some of them. However, the ability to share data efficiently is still more science that ordinary process.

What is my conclusion? The need to integrate and share data is urgent. However, the way organizations are doing it, reminds me space shuttle programs. There is a need to downgrade and simplify these integration efforts to become more similar to transatlantic flights or even car trips. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
21 July, 2024

Today I want to talk about Manufacturing BOM (or how it is often called MBOM). Over the course of last...

8 April, 2014

Product Lifecycle Management is not a software. It is business strategy and approach. One of my blog readers mentioned that...

9 March, 2025

PLM was around for the last 2-3 decades slowly evolving from CAD file management to more sophisticated database to manage...

12 September, 2020

Customer preferences changed significantly since Henry Ford invented the Model-T and built a completely vertically integrated manufacturing facility making everything...

8 August, 2012

One of the technological trends I’m observing these days is a trend towards granularity. Speaking about marketing, the word granularity...

9 October, 2009

The new efficiency is where cost saving, productivity and innovation meet. I was reading “The New Efficiency” letter from Steve...

16 June, 2015

Culture can eat strategy for breakfast and technology for lunch. When it comes to PLM, the implementation and organizational alignment...

3 March, 2020

I’m often getting emails with the questions about how to find a lightweight PDM system. PDM is around for more...

23 November, 2019

Acquisitions are part of every industry development these days. Usually, it is a major event in the company, product, technology,...

Blogroll

To the top