A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM: Share Data or Die

PLM: Share Data or Die
Oleg
Oleg
22 January, 2011 | 2 min for reading

I’m still digesting a huge amount of information I learned from PLM Innovation Congress earlier this week in London. However, there is one trend that I can identify that struck me as a major one coming across all presentations and talks. I can call it “integrate and share” trend. The problem of integration and share of data is not new in manufacturing organization. The need for integration of various elements of data for product development, manufacturing and supply chain is clear. Software vendors and customers are working for on this for years. However, something new happens now that allow me to have a fresh look on this.

Integration Processes

The sound of integration needs is very loud, and you are able to see it in presentations. I put few examples of pictures I made during the event to show how customers explain their critical business issues related to integration of data and processes in organizations. In a nutshell, inability to provide smooth integration prevents streamlining of organizational processes. It appears in communication between engineering and manufacturing, sales and production, support and sales.

Share Data

The need to share data is obvious. However, data sharing was never realized in an easy way. There are multiple reasons for that. Some of them are including the nature of people (keep my data close to me), company organization (departments, hierarchy, etc.) and competition between vendors (lock-in data inside of proprietary formats and data structures). At the same the value of data sharing is obvious. Organizations are losing money, projects are going out of schedules just because of that. PLM aimed to solve this problem during the past decade. I have to note a significant success in multiple implementations I had a chance to see. I personally participated in some of them. However, the ability to share data efficiently is still more science that ordinary process.

What is my conclusion? The need to integrate and share data is urgent. However, the way organizations are doing it, reminds me space shuttle programs. There is a need to downgrade and simplify these integration efforts to become more similar to transatlantic flights or even car trips. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
20 February, 2009

I’d like to discuss 3D. The following 3D Perspectives blog post “Do Designers Really Want to Communicate in 3D?” got...

7 January, 2024

The complexity is on the rise in the modern manufacturing industry and industrial companies. There are multiple dimensions of the...

3 September, 2014

These days,  innovation is coming not only in technologies and products, but also to business models. We are observing one...

21 October, 2016

Manufacturing companies want the data to be well organized and easy to find. However, the reality is just opposite. Data...

4 June, 2023

I’m continuing to digest LiveWorx 2023 from a few weeks ago. Today I want to talk about PTC migration to...

15 May, 2018

Among many topics I’m following, these two three letter acronyms are capable to ignite a discussion almost every single time....

18 July, 2016

Business Advantage Group, a market research firm published results of survey conducted in November 2015 related to the adoption and...

21 October, 2009

Some technology and infrastructure thinking today coming out of SharePoint Conference in Las Vegas, NV. Without going to more systematic...

14 July, 2013

PLM is expanding and vendors are always looking for new market segments and niches. One of the well known white...

Blogroll

To the top