A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

5 Gallons of Processes and the future of PLMometer

5 Gallons of Processes and the future of PLMometer
Oleg
Oleg
3 August, 2012 | 2 min for reading

Free is the best future price. If you follow my blog, you probably had a chance to read this post three years ago. The world of software is very different nowadays. Trends such as open source, software as a services (SaaS), freemium – this is only a short list of new business models. Earlier this year, I had a chance to run panel discussion – The Future of PLM business models at PLM Innovation conference in Munich. You can take a look on my slides here.

One of the interesting trends these days is a shift from ownership to share and services. It happens in different fields. My best non-software example is Michelin selling miles instead of tires and Zipcar share-car service.

The following blog post by Kenesto caught my attention couple of days ago – How to price PLM in the cloud? Kenesto believes  to innovate not only in cloud process management technologies, but also in the way this technology will be sold.

We believe that the cloud encourages changes to the way process automation software can — and should be — priced. So, we started from a clean sheet of paper when we decided how to price Kenesto. We don’t have legacy “seats” to preserve or boxes to push. We’ve not only changed the way process automation software works and is delivered, we also hope we have changed (for the better) the way people buy it.

In a nutshell, Kenesto is proposing companies to pay per bundle of processes. Pricing plans are available from 100 processes/month and up to 8000 processes/month. This process model made me think a bit differently about PLM pricing and  process management, specifically. Do you want me to sell processes “by gallons” as a gas? My expectation that process management software will streamline processes in the organization. What does it mean? Improve processes doesn’t say much if company has more processes or fewer processes. Who is responsible to set “valid amount of processes” for any organization? Another question that this model generated is how to make software cost predictable. Imaging tomorrow engineer cannot open ECO because of process limit. Does it sound crazy? Who knows…

What is my conclusion? The idea of PLMometer with customer credit card connected to processes counter is an interesting one. It sounds similar to Google pay-per-click model. You can print money based on the amount of processes used by engineering and other people in the organization. Pay per click worked for Google. Will it work for Kenesto? – a good question to ask. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
18 August, 2014

Time is running fast. It has been two years since I posted GrabCAD: from Facebook for engineers to PLM. If...

4 May, 2011

Microsoft Office plays a significant role in your engineering environment. Just think about the number of Excels you have to...

16 October, 2018

One of the trending topic in PLM these days is model driven enterprise discussion. Here are few articles to start...

10 December, 2023

The credit for the picture above goes to Martin Eigner book about System Lifecycle Management. I’d like to continue the...

16 October, 2014

It has been more than two years since I was reviewing Kenesto – an outfit founded by Mike Payne with...

15 July, 2016

PLM is transforming from pure engineering discipline into platform capable to manage a diverse set of data and processes. I...

8 August, 2014

Process management is a very important part of any PLM software. You can find one in every PLM system. There...

7 February, 2017

Solidworks World 2017 have started yesterday in Los Angeles, CA. It brings ~5000 individual designers, companies, partners and vendors under...

18 November, 2014

Social software was hot topic in engineering software ecosystem for the last few years. The results are somewhat mixed. Start-up...

Blogroll

To the top