A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

5 Gallons of Processes and the future of PLMometer

5 Gallons of Processes and the future of PLMometer
Oleg
Oleg
3 August, 2012 | 2 min for reading

Free is the best future price. If you follow my blog, you probably had a chance to read this post three years ago. The world of software is very different nowadays. Trends such as open source, software as a services (SaaS), freemium – this is only a short list of new business models. Earlier this year, I had a chance to run panel discussion – The Future of PLM business models at PLM Innovation conference in Munich. You can take a look on my slides here.

One of the interesting trends these days is a shift from ownership to share and services. It happens in different fields. My best non-software example is Michelin selling miles instead of tires and Zipcar share-car service.

The following blog post by Kenesto caught my attention couple of days ago – How to price PLM in the cloud? Kenesto believes  to innovate not only in cloud process management technologies, but also in the way this technology will be sold.

We believe that the cloud encourages changes to the way process automation software can — and should be — priced. So, we started from a clean sheet of paper when we decided how to price Kenesto. We don’t have legacy “seats” to preserve or boxes to push. We’ve not only changed the way process automation software works and is delivered, we also hope we have changed (for the better) the way people buy it.

In a nutshell, Kenesto is proposing companies to pay per bundle of processes. Pricing plans are available from 100 processes/month and up to 8000 processes/month. This process model made me think a bit differently about PLM pricing and  process management, specifically. Do you want me to sell processes “by gallons” as a gas? My expectation that process management software will streamline processes in the organization. What does it mean? Improve processes doesn’t say much if company has more processes or fewer processes. Who is responsible to set “valid amount of processes” for any organization? Another question that this model generated is how to make software cost predictable. Imaging tomorrow engineer cannot open ECO because of process limit. Does it sound crazy? Who knows…

What is my conclusion? The idea of PLMometer with customer credit card connected to processes counter is an interesting one. It sounds similar to Google pay-per-click model. You can print money based on the amount of processes used by engineering and other people in the organization. Pay per click worked for Google. Will it work for Kenesto? – a good question to ask. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
17 August, 2009

I’d like to follow few very interesting discussions that happened last week. Few blog posts you probably want to read...

24 December, 2016

  For decades, marketing strategies have been telling companies to differentiate. From startups to large enterprise companies, the ability to...

9 April, 2023

The world has shifted to a data-driven ecosystem where predictive analytics and AI automation are essential components for success in...

5 September, 2021

In recent years, we’ve been accustomed to searching everything on Google. It is easy to find the answer to your...

6 January, 2010

I’ve been thinking about Microsoft SharePoint success in enterprise organizations. For the last few years Microsoft leapfrog in their ability...

9 December, 2015

The concept of workflows is well known in engineering, manufacturing and other domains of enterprise applications. Workflow mechanism is fundamental...

12 August, 2010

Scaling up is a tough problem. I want to talk today and PLM Software scalability in unusual aspects – business...

24 December, 2008
12 January, 2011

There is one topic that always raises lots of controversy, in my view. I’m talking about integrations or even more...

Blogroll

To the top