A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Virtual Events, 3D Experience and Efficiency

Virtual Events, 3D Experience and Efficiency
Oleg
Oleg
9 September, 2012 | 2 min for reading

No, this blog post is not about Dassault 3D Experience. Even more… this post is not about PLM. Last week, I had a chance to attend first ever virtual PLM event – Social PLM 2012. You can see some of presentations already on Youtube. Navigate to this link to see them. Preparation and presenting at this virtual conference made me think about 3D appearance online and user experience.

The idea of Social PLM virtual event is great. Fully immersive 3D environment with avatars, halls, presenting rooms, seats, almost natural people movement and many other effects. My expectation was very high, and I was interested to experience that. The practice was a bit different. The tuning of the environment had some specific elements that created many IT complications – required open firewall ports, specific versions of browsers and headset requirements. Inside of the environment, the user experience wasn’t always very intuitive, I wasn’t able to see people in the hall and my presentation slides. Comments and questions were available only via online chat and not by voice.

My experience as an attendee and presenter at Social PLM 2012 made me think about the complexity of 3D user experience. I’ve been comparing 3D user experience with Webex and Google Hangout. The first one is simple virtual sharing of slides with limited video presence. It has some limitations and allows you to get job done and share your thoughts with the audience. Opposite to that Google Hangout (I admit that I have very limited experience) allows you to have an immersive video communication with your colleagues and friends.

What is my conclusion? Here is a single word, which I believe is important to remember – efficiency. 3D is cool and can be very entertaining. However, if it creates lots of additional complexity levels, you might decide to go with something that Google calls “good enough”. Webex can be good enough technology to share my speech today. At the same time, I can see a growing interest in 3D experience. I think Social PLM 2012 was good not only because of excellent PLM presentations, but also as a lesson of future 3D experience. I hope PLM vendors learned the lesson and will make right conclusions. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
9 May, 2016

I was catching up on news during the weekend. One of the articles in Boston Globes caught my attention –...

12 July, 2024

PLM and ERP are two topics that always can trigger an interest from industrial companies and software vendors. The ubiquitous...

6 May, 2019

I’m coming to the Digital Factory Boston conference tomorrow. The conference is organized by Formlabs (formlabs.com). The program will be...

28 December, 2013

Cloud PLM is a not a new word any more. Established vendors and newcomers in PLM world are developing strategies...

17 August, 2015

Last year, my attention was caught by CIMdata article – IBM Forms New Watson Group to Meet Growing Demand for...

29 February, 2020

There are very few topics in PLM vocabulary that can raise fewer debates that these three letters – FFF, which...

4 October, 2016

To maintain consistent Bill of Materials is one of the most complex data management processes between design and manufacturing. Siemens...

21 September, 2009

As it looks like, the first public results about CAD applications running from cloud are coming from Autodesk. My attention...

29 July, 2009

SaaS, On Demand, Cloud Services… Who is not speaking about these cool future capabilities these days. So, I was thinking...

Blogroll

To the top