A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Virtual Events, 3D Experience and Efficiency

Virtual Events, 3D Experience and Efficiency
Oleg
Oleg
9 September, 2012 | 2 min for reading

No, this blog post is not about Dassault 3D Experience. Even more… this post is not about PLM. Last week, I had a chance to attend first ever virtual PLM event – Social PLM 2012. You can see some of presentations already on Youtube. Navigate to this link to see them. Preparation and presenting at this virtual conference made me think about 3D appearance online and user experience.

The idea of Social PLM virtual event is great. Fully immersive 3D environment with avatars, halls, presenting rooms, seats, almost natural people movement and many other effects. My expectation was very high, and I was interested to experience that. The practice was a bit different. The tuning of the environment had some specific elements that created many IT complications – required open firewall ports, specific versions of browsers and headset requirements. Inside of the environment, the user experience wasn’t always very intuitive, I wasn’t able to see people in the hall and my presentation slides. Comments and questions were available only via online chat and not by voice.

My experience as an attendee and presenter at Social PLM 2012 made me think about the complexity of 3D user experience. I’ve been comparing 3D user experience with Webex and Google Hangout. The first one is simple virtual sharing of slides with limited video presence. It has some limitations and allows you to get job done and share your thoughts with the audience. Opposite to that Google Hangout (I admit that I have very limited experience) allows you to have an immersive video communication with your colleagues and friends.

What is my conclusion? Here is a single word, which I believe is important to remember – efficiency. 3D is cool and can be very entertaining. However, if it creates lots of additional complexity levels, you might decide to go with something that Google calls “good enough”. Webex can be good enough technology to share my speech today. At the same time, I can see a growing interest in 3D experience. I think Social PLM 2012 was good not only because of excellent PLM presentations, but also as a lesson of future 3D experience. I hope PLM vendors learned the lesson and will make right conclusions. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
30 June, 2021

The world is slowly but surely getting hooked on the data. Finding the right way to manage the data is...

11 February, 2014

Open source is a topic that raised many controversy in the last decade. Especially if you speak about enterprise software....

3 December, 2012

The complexity of user interface in PLM applications is a well-known fact that acknowledged by almost all PLM vendors today....

21 March, 2011

The definition of what is Product Lifecycle Management is one of the most controversial topics in PLM blogosphere and other...

2 July, 2011

CAD, PLM and engineering software world is very competitive. Time ago, CAD vendors competed on the number of features. It...

29 December, 2017

Few weeks ago, my attention was caught my Jim Hepplemann tweet. When I co-founded Windchill nearly 20 yrs ago, it...

18 April, 2019

I’m continuing to share my favorite moments of COFES 2019 I attended last week. One of them is Eric Anderson’s...

26 March, 2017

Existing PLM systems were born few decades ago to provide a solution to control engineering data. Hence the paradigm of...

4 February, 2020

PI PLMx event is happening these days in London. I wasn’t able to attend this year. The tagline How PLM...

Blogroll

To the top