A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should We Stop ‘Engineering PLM’?

Should We Stop ‘Engineering PLM’?
Oleg
Oleg
29 September, 2012 | 2 min for reading

Even if PLM (as a buzzword, business strategy and software) has a relatively short history, we can talk about some historical roots. There are two main roots or directions in the historical development of PLM. One takes us to design companies, CAD, Engineering Data Management (EDM) and Product data management (PDM). Another one takes us to business systems like enterprise resource management (ERP), workflow and business process management (BPM). These two roots defined the way PLM systems were sold and implemented in many companies during the past decade. First direction used CAD and engineering foundation to establish an initial PLM implementation. ERP vendors were slow in introducing product lifecycle management solutions. Independent PLM companies were weak financially and because of traditional conflict for data-ownership lost the battle to more powerful CAD and ERP companies.

Recently, I started to hear more voices towards “a process foundation” of PLM. The combination of cost-effective platforms (open source, cloud) and increased sensitivity to ROI created the opportunity for new style of PLM implementations – faster, cheaper and… less engineering focus. The last one requires some additional explanation. For many years, the roots of PLM implementations go to engineering department. I can see many benefits in doing so. However, engineering foundation and engineering focus slower an adoption of PLM system by other departments. I’ve been reading Yoann Maingon Minerva blog called Stop starting PLM from Engineering. The main point is how to proliferate in PLM to non-engineering parts of an organization. I liked the following passage:

Start your implementation’s phase 1 out of engineering and you’ll get live much faster. These people need integrated systems and their processes are more stable then in engineering. We know that in engineering you can have very different software acceptance from one to another. You need then to have people in the company that are already supporting the project. The risk is of course to not take into account the software capabilities to support Engineer’s processes. And that’s where it is good to have IT people coming from Engineering to select the solution.

What is my conclusion? I can see lots of interesting opportunities in starting PLM from a business side and not engineering side. You can get results (and ROI) much faster. The industry matters, in my view. You can start PLM outside of engineering in companies heavily focusing on the supply chain, build to print processes, service organizations, process industries and others. I’d not be trying to start outside of engineering in companies focusing on ETO and large OEMs in automotive, defense and aerospace. Just my thoughts… What is your opinion and practices?

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
2 August, 2012

Cloud PLM conversation is heating up. With all pros and cons, the opinion, I can hear very often – cloud...

15 March, 2022

Manufacturing companies are under pressure to transform their operations to stay competitive. It includes changes in business models, turning data...

28 October, 2016

Manufacturing companies are learning about the value of data assets. For the last few years, we have seen a tremendous interest...

4 August, 2020

A few weeks ago, we learned about the major move of Siemens Industrial Software (formerly known as Siemens PLM) to...

15 December, 2011

Let’s talk about emails today. How many of them are you reading or writing daily? A lot? Emails are with...

5 October, 2015

Everyone likes innovation. It gives you good feeling and brings the whole power of imagination into your brain. If you...

5 October, 2019

I’m coming to PI PLMx conference in San Diego which will take place next month in beautiful San Diego. Organized...

27 February, 2017

At the time research companies and industries pundits are trying to answer on the question why cloud PLM adoption is...

8 February, 2021

My recent blog about how to integrate BOMs and also the opportunity to have a Single BOM? brought many questions...

Blogroll

To the top