A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Should We Stop ‘Engineering PLM’?

Should We Stop ‘Engineering PLM’?
Oleg
Oleg
29 September, 2012 | 2 min for reading

Even if PLM (as a buzzword, business strategy and software) has a relatively short history, we can talk about some historical roots. There are two main roots or directions in the historical development of PLM. One takes us to design companies, CAD, Engineering Data Management (EDM) and Product data management (PDM). Another one takes us to business systems like enterprise resource management (ERP), workflow and business process management (BPM). These two roots defined the way PLM systems were sold and implemented in many companies during the past decade. First direction used CAD and engineering foundation to establish an initial PLM implementation. ERP vendors were slow in introducing product lifecycle management solutions. Independent PLM companies were weak financially and because of traditional conflict for data-ownership lost the battle to more powerful CAD and ERP companies.

Recently, I started to hear more voices towards “a process foundation” of PLM. The combination of cost-effective platforms (open source, cloud) and increased sensitivity to ROI created the opportunity for new style of PLM implementations – faster, cheaper and… less engineering focus. The last one requires some additional explanation. For many years, the roots of PLM implementations go to engineering department. I can see many benefits in doing so. However, engineering foundation and engineering focus slower an adoption of PLM system by other departments. I’ve been reading Yoann Maingon Minerva blog called Stop starting PLM from Engineering. The main point is how to proliferate in PLM to non-engineering parts of an organization. I liked the following passage:

Start your implementation’s phase 1 out of engineering and you’ll get live much faster. These people need integrated systems and their processes are more stable then in engineering. We know that in engineering you can have very different software acceptance from one to another. You need then to have people in the company that are already supporting the project. The risk is of course to not take into account the software capabilities to support Engineer’s processes. And that’s where it is good to have IT people coming from Engineering to select the solution.

What is my conclusion? I can see lots of interesting opportunities in starting PLM from a business side and not engineering side. You can get results (and ROI) much faster. The industry matters, in my view. You can start PLM outside of engineering in companies heavily focusing on the supply chain, build to print processes, service organizations, process industries and others. I’d not be trying to start outside of engineering in companies focusing on ETO and large OEMs in automotive, defense and aerospace. Just my thoughts… What is your opinion and practices?

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
3 December, 2018

One of the topics of my interest is to compare between PLM and BIM. Let me put a disclaimer from...

20 April, 2010

I hope you know about my “love and hate” relationships with Excel. I posted many times about how deep Excel...

8 December, 2011

I’m sure, you are familiar with highway 101 crossing Silicon Valley. However, you probably never heard about PLM Highway in...

5 December, 2011

Crowd-sourcing is a popular trend these days. For those of you out of sync, in a nutshell, crowd-sourcing is a...

28 September, 2009

Short prompt in the beginning of the week. I was reading post from BSW “Killer Ideas And Controlled Innovation: Why...

20 July, 2010

Note: My new website and blog is BeyondPLM. I’m proud to share some numbers about live discussions that happen in...

3 September, 2021

Every manufacturing company now is a software company. I’ve heard this statement a few years ago from one of our...

7 March, 2016

Last week announcement about Autodesk and Siemens PLM agreement to increase software interoperability generated waves of articles. Here are few notable...

30 November, 2011

Autodesk University 2011. Day 1. If you visited AU at least once you know how it looks like. Thousands people...

Blogroll

To the top