A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How to get engineers, to do PLM?

How to get engineers, to do PLM?
Oleg
Oleg
5 December, 2012 | 3 min for reading

Enterprise software is a complicated beast. PLM is not an exclusion from the list. Despite demands to be simplified and become user friendly, the majority of PLM implementations require long preparation, planning and implementation phases. However, this is only a visible part of the iceberg. The invisible part (and probably mostly important) that many people are rejecting to use data-management software. If you speak to engineers, they can tell you how they hate everything that makes their lives very complicated. Here is the question I can hear many times in industry discussions, conferences, dispute and blogs – how to get engineers to use PLM software?

I’ve been thinking about different approaches. The following TechCrunch article caught my attention – Ways to get people to do things they don’t want to do. Read the article and make your conclusion. The analogy with kids is pretty funny. At the end of the days, engineers like kids… (excuse me, engineers, but it was a compliment :)). This is my favorite passage:

Unfortunately, the corporate norm remains drawing up a long list of what needs to get done and throwing it over the email wall to be completed… or else! There will always be tasks people don’t want to do. But there are better ways to motivate others, principally by designing conditions where people actuate themselves. Fundamentally, people resist being controlled and both the carrot and the stick can be tools for unwanted manipulation. Instead, designing behavior by putting in the forethought to appropriately stage tasks, providing progress indicators, and finally, offering celebratory rewards under the right circumstances, are easy ways to motivate while maintaining a sense of autonomy. Whether in the doctor’s office or the corner office, it is the job of the person inflicting the pain to do their utmost to ease it. Not doing so is intellectually lazy, whether to a kid or to a colleague. Considering how the receiver could more easily comply with the request is at the heart of inspiring action.

Here is my 3 ways of how software vendors can reduce the pain and to simplify the way for engineers to be involved into PLM activities:

1. One step at the time. This is a fundamental change, in my view. Most of PLM activities looks like multi-year journey, which involves the transformation of company business processes and activities. To make flexible software capable to be adapted to company processes. Then make a change “one process at the time” is the future of PLM software.

2. Improvements KPI. To develop tools that can demonstrate improvements indicators. These tools can be used by company to promote and appreciate people involved into the implementation of PLM programs.

3. Social Features. Implement “social features” and tools that can help people to promote what they do in the company. Imagine PLM software can help people to become more visible in the organization can help to develop additional incentives to use PLM software.

What is my conclusion? Technology is simple. People are hard. I’ve heard this conclusion couple of years ago from John Gage’s keynote at COFES and I like it very much. It precisely explains why software programs and IT projects are failing despite brilliant code and amazing technological achievements. PLM vendors need to think how to connect their software to an individual engineer to make it more successful in the future. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Image credit Angry Engineer.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
2 October, 2021

Differentiation is a big deal in business and every company wants to stand outside compared to their business counterparts by...

13 March, 2014

It has been 25 years of Internet anniversary yesterday. Lots of article covering this event were flown around earlier this...

30 August, 2011

I think the world around us is about to change. A couple of weeks ago I posted PLM and Future...

4 April, 2017

The Congress on the Future of Engineering Software (COFES) will take place later this week in sunny Scottsdale, AZ. The...

27 March, 2017

Lifecycle management is one of the most fundamental value propositions PLM systems are selling. The ability to manage lifecycle of...

4 February, 2014

Collaboration was always in the focus of engineering software. Started earlier with CAD and product data management, software vendors tried...

6 December, 2020

The discussion about single-tenant vs multi-tenant cloud PLM models is getting more interesting every day. And it is not only...

28 February, 2011

Few days ago, I attended webinar One the Edge with Cadalyst – MCAD Smackdown: Direct vs .Parametric CAD. Navigate to...

17 April, 2017

Remember the time when quality typing on mobile device was only possible using physical keyboard. Nokia phone keyboard was a...

Blogroll

To the top