A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

BOM 101: How Many Levels Do You Need in BOM?

BOM 101: How Many Levels Do You Need in BOM?
Oleg
Oleg
30 January, 2013 | 3 min for reading

I’m continue my BOM 101 series of posts. When working on bill of materials, you can often hear about the ability of BOM management software to support so-called “multi-level” BOM. You can search for the definition of multi-level BOM using Google and find many results. I found the following definition of multi-level BOM on Arena website quite balanced. Here is the passage from the Mult-level BOM article:

A multi-level BOM, also referred to as an indented BOM, depicts parent-child relationships and shows the hierarchical structure of assemblies and their related parts and components. A multi-level BOM is essentially a nested list whose parts or items are listed in two or more levels of detail to illustrate multiple assemblies within a product’s BOM. In contrast, a single-level BOM depicts one level of children in an assembly and only the components needed to make that assembly are listed.

In the past, when BOM was managed using paper and spreadsheets, to create multi-level BOM wasn’t a simple task. Computer systems create an opportunity to manage and manipulate easily with multiple levels of BOM. However, the question people are asking usually – how many levels of BOM do we need? This simple question is actually leads to many interesting discussions. From my practice it related to many factors. The most typical are – type of BOM (engineering, manufacturing, support), type of the product, maturity of product development and many others.

I found an interesting writeup about BOM levels in the Frank Watts’ book – Configuration Management Metrics. Navigate to the following link – I was able to access this book fragment using Google Books. Here is an interesting passage:

The tendencies of the companies to create multi-level assembly structures seems to be overwhelming. This analyst has witnessed 11 levels at a couple of companies and had a seminar attendee tell about 16 levels. Many departments wish to add structure for their apparent need and many needs are not in best interest of the company as a whole. Because agreement cannot be reached on one structure, often an “Engineering BOM” and a “Manufacturing BOM” are created. Often a material folks create “Planning BOM”. Many times various department can reach agreement only by adding additional layers to the BOM. 

The following diagram shows the number of levels in BOM correlated to maturity of product development. The analyst believes a better communication can be achieved by creating a BOM with minimum levels of structure.

What is my conclusion? The fact you can create multiple levels of BOM doesn’t mean you need to utilize it at full capacity. Multi-level BOMs are complicated and adding an additional work in the process of changes. How to maintain the right number of BOM levels? I’m interested to learn more about your experience. How many BOM levels do you have in your company ERP/MRP/PDM/PLM system? Speak your mind.

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud-based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups, and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
29 June, 2010

My post Open vs. Closed PLM Debates last week and related Fortune CNN Money Blog article by Jon Fortt –...

26 July, 2019

Standards are like toothbrushes, a good idea but no one wants to use anyone elses. The history of engineering and...

8 May, 2009

  Life around us is changing dramatically. The current global economic situation and technology have the potential to change the...

27 January, 2024

Earlier this week, an insightful article by Prof. Jorg Fischer grabbed my attention. It explored the complexity of BOM (Bill...

5 July, 2019

AI is a new trend. It brings a new wave of technological disruption across industries. Think about Web and Mobile...

21 January, 2017

Manufacturing world is changing and it can bring new opportunities for transformation and changes. Few days ago, I posted an...

1 February, 2016

Part numbers are hard. What started as a simple number and references to a part company usually purchase from a supplier,...

26 November, 2010

This week Siemens PLM announced – “Daimler AG has selected CAD Software from Siemens as their standard for their worldwide...

11 June, 2010

I’ve been reading SolidSmack post – Jim Heppelmann. Dassault Arrogant Competition. Siemens Invisible. This post made me think more about...

Blogroll

To the top