A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PDM: Rightsize, Wrongsize, Overkill?

PDM: Rightsize, Wrongsize, Overkill?
Oleg
Oleg
23 April, 2013 | 2 min for reading

I want to talk about PDM today. Product Data Management is not a new topic. Companies are using PDM many years. However, here is a deal – after many years of PDM deployment, customers are still trying to avoid to implement PDM. You may think it is mostly small and medium companies, but it is not true. I’ve seen many large companies that are using files and folders structure to manage their design files and revisions.

You may think PDM overkill? The issue of “sizing” of PDM and PLM isn’t new as well. Navigate to one of my previous posts about that – PLM: Rightsizing vs. Wrongsizing Debates. My conclusion there – size doesn’t matter. Two major aspects of PDM/PLM deployment – user experience and cost of ownership. PLM needs to focus on these sooner than later.

I wasn’t alone in the discussion about PDM for SMB and rightsizing. My industry friends Chad Jackson and Jim Brown captured this topic in their regular talk show – Tech4PD. Navigate to this link to read more – Is Product Data Management Overkill for Small Design Teams? If you have few minutes watch the video.

The discussion made me think about two significant issues where PDM brings overkill to engineers. First and most important – nobody likes data management. If you are in a big company and your boss will tell you to use PDM, you do. However, if you have even a chance not to use PDM, you won’t miss that opportunity. Design is cool, but data management is boring stuff.  So, if it is an absolute need, then you agree to use it. However, here is where the second question is coming – cost! The issue of cost is coming faster than you expected. It is not a cheap job to deploy PDM even for small company with 5-10 users.

What is my conclusion? Last 15 years of PDM didn’t solve the problem of user experience and cost for PDM. We still see high cost of PDM systems and user experience coming from last century. Customers are demanding new type of tools even going beyond what mainstream PDMs (eg. SolidWorks Enterprise PDM and Autodesk Vault) are capable to provide. The time for innovation is coming. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
4 September, 2013

Speak to people about PLM and they will tell you about CAD design, BOMs, processes, ECOs, collaboration and other similar...

13 January, 2012

Do you have any plans to develop enterprise software in 2012? Interesting set of predictions is coming from Christian Verstraete and...

2 March, 2010

Few weeks ago, I promised to blog about PLM and Innovation. It started by the following post – “PLM vs....

30 June, 2017

I spent last 3 days attending CONTACT Open World. If you missed my earlier posts, take a look here and...

30 March, 2010

Thanks for one of my readers who sent me the link to Wrench Enterprise. Their presentation about project collaboration and...

3 May, 2011

The ability to use PLM in downstream applications was always a challenge. There are multiple reasons for that – complexity...

15 December, 2018

Fundamentally new technologies don’t become productive until a generation after their introduction. The time it takes people to learn how...

22 April, 2016

Distributed environment is a new reality in manufacturing and it creates many new challenges. You can argue that manufacturing companies...

7 February, 2011

Cost is important. Period. About 70% of product cost is defined during the design phase. So, to have PLM helping...

Blogroll

To the top