A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Services, Department Stores and Digital Future

PLM Services, Department Stores and Digital Future
Oleg
Oleg
2 June, 2014 | 3 min for reading

plm-department-stores-services-amazon

Don’t be surprised if your most trusted CAD/PLM service provider will be acquired tomorrow. According to Joe Barkai’s post- PLM Service Providers Ready To Deliver Greater Value, we have been witnessing a wave of mergers and acquisitions of PLM services companies (the examples – Accenture / PRION Group, Accenture / PCO Innovation, KPIT-Tech / I-Cubed /Akoya; Kalypso / Integware merge). The following passage gives you a feeling of the core reason behind that.

For years, PLM companies focused more on PLM /PDM implementation than on actually improving business processes. While the business benefits of PLM were well articulated and supported by rosy ROI models and complex colorful architecture slides, many manufacturing companies were unable to achieve the process changes and enterprise software integration that were need to reap the promised benefits, and ended up implementing a PDM system. Albeit critical for managing product data, this reality might explain why some manufacturers feel they might have overpaid for their PLM implementation efforts.

The status quo may be changing, and organizations that have gone through massive implementation projects are ready for more. They need to improve their capacity for more complex multidisciplinary decisions using product data, whether it’s stored in PLM/PDM, ERP or in other, less structured forms; they need to improve collaboration in elongated and fragmented design partner networks and supply chains; they need to leverage product and consumer insight garnered  from social media, warranty claims, and channel activities.

The story makes sense to me. In my post few weeks ago – Why PLM stuck in PDM?, I’ve been talking about exactly the same reasons behind a problem with deep and broad PLM adoption – (1) focus on CAD, (2) poor integration between PLM and ERP, (3) absence of process thinking, etc.

Joe’s article made me think about the role PLM service providers will play in the future PLM implementation strategies. It reminded me department stores. Think Macy’s, JCPenny, Bloomingdale, Nordstorm… Large manufacturing companies own a huge chunk of PLM software. Every PLM vendor has their own strong characteristics. One size doesn’t fit all. Customers’ existing investments are huge.I don’t see these manufacturing companies will start jumping between vendors. So, how to make existing PLM system work and show bigger value becomes very important. Which obviously raises the question about qualified service providers. Large teams and ability to implement any PLM software will be the key for success and profit. Customers will be coming to the PLM service department store and guided to the right brand(s) or configuration of brands depends on their preferences and constraints.

You may ask me who will play the role of Amazon in the growing PLM service eco-system? This is a very interesting question to ask. Will e-commerce come and disrupt B&M PLM services? Who will provide a new class of systems, which requires different service capabilities? Who will provide online PLM services in a lean way. Joe is mentioning Autodesk PLM360, GrabCAD and Aras in the list of potential candidates. Who knows…

What is conclusion? The history often repeats. To pay attention on existing trajectories and department stores and e-commerce is important. New e-commerce vendors are growing up, but  existing B&M department stores are selling lots of stuff. The same happens in PLM. Today, large vendors provide solutions for companies that ready to implement existing PLM software. It sounds like a good strategy for large manufacturing companies with deep pockets. Until the question about “lean and digital” will come up. Will online and lean PLM offerings compete with existing PLM vendors? This is a good question. There is a good chance for newcomers to play disruptive strategies. However, alternatives are possible as well. Either newborns in the cloud will outgrow existing B&M or existing vendors will develop right digital skills and experience. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
3 January, 2011

I’ve read the following article Oracle butts into online collaboration space with Cloud Office. It struck me as something important....

7 April, 2024

Back many years ago I had a customer who challenged me to develop a “single button” application. It was long...

1 February, 2012

An interesting addition to my yesterday post about technological options for cloud PLM. I was reading Amazon’s announcement that came...

7 April, 2016

I’m excited to share news about openBoM. Thinking about modern manufacturing challenges brought me together with my partner, Vic Sanchez,...

12 February, 2023

Learning is hard. The world around us is changing and the same is happening with the process of learning. The...

14 April, 2015

PLM sales is not an easy job. PLM is usually “sold” to companies… or actually sold to people running product...

22 July, 2009

I’m continuing to provide my observation for upcoming Microsoft Office 2010 version. Today, I’d like to discuss two features related...

29 October, 2009

The new release of SolidWorks Labs Threehouse V2 hit me to think again about Top Down approach and efficient communication...

9 January, 2017

Talk to any manufacturing company and they can easy convince you that their products, environment, engineering and manufacturing processes are...

Blogroll

To the top