A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Apple iPhone 6 and and cross product families BOM planning

Apple iPhone 6 and and cross product families BOM planning
Oleg
Oleg
18 August, 2014 | 2 min for reading

ipad-bom-assy

To manage Parts and Bill of Materials is not a simple tasks. I shared some of aspects related to the complexity of Part Numbering last week in my post – Existing data prevents companies to improve Part Numbers. The discussion in comments took me towards the complexity of Part Numbers in supply chain. Here is the passage (comments) made by Joe Barkai

…multiple BOMs with inconsistent numbering schema often hide a bigger problem: inconsistent attributes and metadata. I [Joe Barkai] worked with a global automotive OEM on issues surrounding architectural complexity reduction and global quality management. I discovered that each product line was using different part numbers. This was obviously difficult to manage from a supply chain perspective. But, not less importantly, other metadata and data attributes such as failure modes, labor operation codes and other important information were codified differently, rendering cross product line reporting and analysis difficult and potentially lacking, if not erroneous

Product lines and multiple configurations is a reality of modern manufacturing. The customization level is growing. On the other side to manage parts and BOM globally becomes one of the most important and challenging tasks. I found another example of that in today’s news . This is an example of a potential impact on Apple from management of bill of material  across multiple product lines and supply chain. Navigate to Seeking Alpha post – Apple iPhone 6 Will Pick Up iPad Sales Slack. Here is the passage I captured:

Apple still generates the majority of profits in mobile, despite the slight declines in market share. Last November, research firm IHS estimated  $274 in bill of materials and manufacturing costs for the 16GB iPad Air with Wi-Fi connectivity that retails for $499. Going forward, Tim Cook, operations man, will likely leverage Apple’s immense buying power to further drive down costs for component parts shared between the iPhone 6 and eventual iPad upgrade.

I have no information about PLM system used by Apple to manage bill of materials across product lines. However, I guess, re-use of components among different product lines is a very typical approach used by many manufacturing companies.

What is my conclusion? The complexity of bill of materials management across product lines and supply chain are skyrocketing these days. To manage part numbers, bill of materials, cost and multiple product lines can become a critical part of PLM solution to support manufacturing profitability. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
18 November, 2009

Finally announced by Microsoft – Azure will go to live in January 2010. To make yourself more familiar with Azure,...

11 February, 2017

Interesting things are happening with Solidworks PDM these days. I’ve been following Solidworks World 2017 event earlier this week in...

27 April, 2015

PLM technologies and products went through many changes for the last two decades. If you long timer in PLM industry, you...

6 May, 2009

Last month, I wrote a few posts about Bill of Materials. My interest was to investigate how to improve Bill...

8 March, 2013

I’d like to provoke the discussion about PLM implementations today. I assume most of your had a chance to hear...

10 July, 2018

Back two decades ago, CAD and PLM vendors were competing with ERP for attention of corner suite owners – CIOs...

14 October, 2011

Yesterday I spent my day on Dassault PLM Forum in Moscow. The event website is here. You can see the...

17 March, 2016

Communication is one of the most challenging aspects of our work. My favorite quote and mantra about communication – you...

7 December, 2015

Platform. It is a very confusing term. What is platform and how to define it. Is it just about the...

Blogroll

To the top