A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How long will take GrabCAD to develop full-blown PLM solution?

How long will take GrabCAD to develop full-blown PLM solution?
Oleg
Oleg
18 August, 2014 | 2 min for reading

grabcad-plm-beyondplm

Time is running fast. It has been two years since I posted GrabCAD: from Facebook for engineers to PLM. If you are in the engineering community, the chances you will come to PLM are very high. Like in the past all roads lead to Rome, I guess all future development roads for PDM solution lead to PLM. Even if you don’t like to brand your solution as PLM… Nevertheless, if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and walks like a duck, it’s a duck.

Just few months ago, GrabCAD moved into “PDM” segment by introducing GrabCAD Workbench. Earlier today, GrabCAD made another “quack” towards PLM by adding BOM support. Navigate your browser to the following link to read – BOMs Away! Workbench Adds BOM Management. The following passage outlines what GrabCAD BOM can do today:

We’ve added an easy-to-use BOM export capability to Workbench, enabling any Workbench user to generate a Bill of Materials with just a few clicks. This means that your engineering team and manufacturing team will always be on the same page. Now your purchasing manager or supplier liaison doesn’t need to bother a CAD engineer to generate a BOM, and doesn’t need to enter items individually into Excel each time you change a revision. It’s as simple as two clicks to get the list of components into Excel!

grabCAD-bom-plm

Introducing BOM functionality is a very logical step many PDM systems did. However, it doesn’t come easy. The complexity of system is growing. From what I can see now GrabCAD is an early beginning and just touching BOM functionality to balance customers demand and complexity of full-blown BOM management solution.

What is my conclusion? To extract BOM from CAD drawing is a very neat functionality. My hunch it was requested by many GrabCAD users. However, BOM functionality introduction was a challenge for many PDM systems in the past. The complexity of Part management, multiple BOMs – this is only two visible parts of the iceberg. GrabCAD strategy reminded me what SolidWorks did in the past with PDM – added functionality when it was absolutely requested by majority of customers. I think it worked for SolidWorks… It would be interesting to see how it will work for GrabCAD. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
6 July, 2010

Product-related data is one of the most important aspects of any PLM implementation. When you talk about PLM implementation, the...

29 May, 2014

IoT (Internet of things) is trending these days. Connected houses, cars, sensors, thermostats, LED lamps, etc. On the recent COFES...

24 September, 2021

Earlier this week, I attended the CIMdata PLM forum. You can find my first article with comments here – PLM...

27 June, 2012

If you are technology savvy these days, you probably know what is Apache Hadoop. It originally came to us from...

7 December, 2011

Back to the beginning of this year, I came with the post – Integrating PLM and PDM. Wrong question? My...

25 August, 2009

Yesterday, two separate article got my attention and brought me to think about Lifecycle. Alternatively, even more, about number of...

23 September, 2015

I started a series of blog posts about PLM dedicated to hardware startups. In my previous article, I explained why...

24 April, 2017

The debates about “out-of-the-box” OOTB PLM implementations seems to be endless. I posted many articles sharing opinion about OOTB PLM...

19 June, 2009

I’m going back to talking about the CAD interoperability story, inspired by some interesting experience with Google Apps and Microsoft...

Blogroll

To the top