A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why Slack can be a communication tool engineers want?

Why Slack can be a communication tool engineers want?
Oleg
Oleg
9 April, 2015 | 2 min for reading

slack-image

Communication is an important element of our work. We live in an extremely connected world. To communicate with people you work on the same team and between teams can be a critical factor to make project successful. I’ve been learning Slack for the last few weeks. Slack is online communication platform that is catching lot of attention for the last time. It is a startup with more than $1B valuation. Take a look on it over the weekend. It is polished and provides very slick UI.

My experience with Slack made me think about collaboration in engineering teams. It has some connection to old discussions about “social PLM”. However, social PLM idea was doomed. I can mention few reasons why it happened – it provided bad experience for communication, it wasn’t open and didn’t provide an easy way to publish data.

slack-integrations

Things changed for the last few years, Engineering software is getting better in terms of user experience, but openness and integration are two things that not changing much. Look over collaboration tools provided by PLM vendors and you will see limited number of integration capabilities. It is still very closed world, it is hard to push data in and out. Moreover, it is very difficult to integrate with tools engineers are using these days.

Opposite to that Slack impressed me with the number of integrations and openness. If you think about online digital environment, it basically integrates with everything. Navigate to the following link and take a look on a number of integrations. However, community-built integrations list is every more impressive. It is basically integrates to any language, framework or too.

What is my conclusion? There is a clear need for engineers to communicate. However, think how many social platforms do we need? My hunch- we don’t need many. But we need one… a good one. We need one for engineers to communicate between themselves and outside world. So, the competition for this single communication tool will be tough. In my view, integration will be one of the most critical elements. Imagine great communication and collaboration platform that hard to integrate with. It will fail exactly in the same way as previous “social PLM” initiatives failed. So, there is a chance engineers will like Slack. This is a lesson to learn for PLM vendors. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
13 June, 2022

In today’s business world, it is more important than ever to be able to digitally transform your company in order...

24 May, 2017

PLM definition is one of these questions that often come in the discussions between industry analysts, bloggers and PLM pundits. While...

26 May, 2011

In the old days, the focus of manufacturing companies was mostly about how to produce stuff. Most of the products...

1 July, 2011

This week was packed with multiple announcements and events. One of them happened in Paris – first Dassault Application Innovation...

23 May, 2013

Office and other productivity tools are un-separateable parts of product development environment. Some of them such Microsoft Excel literally can...

17 July, 2020

PDM is one of the topics I’m following for many years. CAD files created tons of challenges and to develop...

12 July, 2016

It usually takes time to implement PLM system. One of the reasons for that is heavy customization and adaptations of...

26 October, 2017

I spent last 2 days attending Develop3D Live conference in Boston. The conference organized by Develop3D is US version of...

23 March, 2018

Collaboration becomes increasingly important for manufacturing companies. Earlier this week, the news about Airbus deal with Google G-suite created some...

Blogroll

To the top