A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why Slack can be a communication tool engineers want?

Why Slack can be a communication tool engineers want?
Oleg
Oleg
9 April, 2015 | 2 min for reading

slack-image

Communication is an important element of our work. We live in an extremely connected world. To communicate with people you work on the same team and between teams can be a critical factor to make project successful. I’ve been learning Slack for the last few weeks. Slack is online communication platform that is catching lot of attention for the last time. It is a startup with more than $1B valuation. Take a look on it over the weekend. It is polished and provides very slick UI.

My experience with Slack made me think about collaboration in engineering teams. It has some connection to old discussions about “social PLM”. However, social PLM idea was doomed. I can mention few reasons why it happened – it provided bad experience for communication, it wasn’t open and didn’t provide an easy way to publish data.

slack-integrations

Things changed for the last few years, Engineering software is getting better in terms of user experience, but openness and integration are two things that not changing much. Look over collaboration tools provided by PLM vendors and you will see limited number of integration capabilities. It is still very closed world, it is hard to push data in and out. Moreover, it is very difficult to integrate with tools engineers are using these days.

Opposite to that Slack impressed me with the number of integrations and openness. If you think about online digital environment, it basically integrates with everything. Navigate to the following link and take a look on a number of integrations. However, community-built integrations list is every more impressive. It is basically integrates to any language, framework or too.

What is my conclusion? There is a clear need for engineers to communicate. However, think how many social platforms do we need? My hunch- we don’t need many. But we need one… a good one. We need one for engineers to communicate between themselves and outside world. So, the competition for this single communication tool will be tough. In my view, integration will be one of the most critical elements. Imagine great communication and collaboration platform that hard to integrate with. It will fail exactly in the same way as previous “social PLM” initiatives failed. So, there is a chance engineers will like Slack. This is a lesson to learn for PLM vendors. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
26 March, 2014

Collaboration is inspiring. It is very overloaded word in engineering space. Collaboration is often used in the context of CAD,...

15 March, 2016

Innovation platform is a new name in the competition of PLM and engineering software. The message is widely supported by analysts...

7 February, 2014

Few years ago, I got a problem with automatic transmission of our Honda Odyssey. The funny part of the story...

6 January, 2021

Each time any major PLM vendor makes a big step onto the acquisition path, the questions about how the technologies...

17 December, 2009

The following article in TechWords “The New FOSS Frontier: The Database Market” drove me to think about PLM and RDBS...

18 March, 2012

Well… I hope got some attention with this provoking title :). Social is trending topic these days. However, let me...

21 August, 2013

Product customization is one of the trends that changing the manufacturing landscape these days. Mass production was a mainstream for...

24 November, 2023

In the PLM data management, Excel has long been considered the most popular tool. As all my product lifecycle management...

13 January, 2024

In my earlier article How to bridge PLM and ERP Systems To Support Modern Product Development and Digital Thread I...

Blogroll

To the top