It takes two to tango. PLM vs. ERP discussions are often reminds me this idiom. Autodesk PLM blog article – PLM v. ERP – What’s the Difference and Why You Should Care took me back to a discussion about roles of PLM and ERP. It reminded me my 7 years old article – PLM vs ERP: Don’t manage innovation. Here is a passage I captured from Autodesk article:
ERP represents a business system that is used across entire enterprises for day-to-day planning and transactions. It involves sales, services, purchases, inventory, facilities, human resources, and many other aspects of the business, with the primary objective of tracking the business’s life blood – its money.
PLM, on the other hand, is a business system with the purpose of “keeping the heart beating”. Its value crosses the organization independently of ERP. The long-term competitive advantage for most businesses derives not just from their cash flow, but from the continuous flow of ideas, especially as related to their products and services. Much of this intellectual property starts ugly and incomplete, and matures within a PLM system into documents and data that are ready to be passed to an ERP for resourcing and execution.
PLM v ERP is one of these conversations that in the past created lot of divide inside manufacturing organizations. Remember my article 3 steps how to put PLM and ERP each in their place? I can see PLM and ERP integrations fail in many companies because it relies to old and outdated integration principles. These old principles relies on data ownership and business of protecting data in a boundary of enterprise applications. It is going to change soon. Want to learn more? Please navigate to some of my earlier articles – The death of EBOM v MBOM divide, PLM, ERP and the death over the wall engineering; Future digital transformation will reshape the boundary between PLM, ERP and MES.
While I agree with the position of the author about importance of doing right thing, I found that thinking about PLM vs ERP is taking us back into siloed approach of enterprise data management. Historically, enterprises charted boundaries between systems in the way they controlled the data and protected their existence. Although, it might be still true for many organization, modern organizations are transforming from waterfall siloed process to agile product development. Coordination between system is more important than ever. It was a time when engineering department was only in charge to throw design to manufacturing department. Then manufacturing did everything else. The things changed since that time. The location of data is less important than granularity of information, services and their availability.
Today, it is a time to move to lean agile product development processes. More often manufacturing companies are finding themselves in the situation where decision making should be done with full visibility into product design, configurations, business models and finance. The decision process in such organization should be driven by all data points. In such situation, the approach what is more important “cash flow” or “idea” is a wrong one. The question “Why is one design alternative better than another?” is a complex questions that requires data analysis coming from multiple data sources. It a dance between multiple systems and data sources. Some of them are located inside of organizations and some of them are outside.
What is my conclusion? The debate about PLM vs ERP should become a history. It was originally the discussion about what database should store the data. It is still an important decision. But regardless on data storage, process implementation will require to make all this data available at your fingertips at the time of the decision. The borders between PLM and ERP are blurring in the agile product development processes. Cloud data services are able to bring the data and there is no clear cut what data belongs to each system any more. Organizations are not the same. Manufacturing company needs to get data from both PLM and ERP to organize agile decision process.. It takes two to tango. PLM and ERP are clearly partners in this dance. Cloud PLMs such as Autodesk Fusion Lifecycle can make it easier than on-premise PLM systems. This is a direction we should be heading to. Just my thoughts…
Want to learn more about PLM? Check out my new PLM Book website.
Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of openBoM developing cloud based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased
Pingback: GHZ Partners | IT Services, Software()
Pingback: Beyond PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) Blog The future of consolidated PLM and ERP? - Beyond PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) Blog()
Pingback: Beyond PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) Blog SuiteWorld 2018: Oracle Netsuite and cloud bridge between PLM and ERP - Beyond PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) Blog()
Pingback: Beyond PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) Blog Enterprise of Things and why ERP and cloud infrastructure vendors will come after PLM data? - Beyond PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) Blog()