A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How PLM can separate data and organization silos

How PLM can separate data and organization silos
Oleg
Oleg
7 March, 2018 | 3 min for reading

For many years, PLM analysts, consultants and vendors claimed that silos are bad and need to be broken to transform the organization. You can see it in so many places. Here are just few examples – Demolish silos using 3DEXPERIENCE by DS; Silos are for farms and not for companies by Zerowait state.

Here is a passage from CIO reviews article –Platformization, Closing Open Loops are Forcing Product Lifecycle Management to the Enterprise  by CIMdata Peter Bilello:

Lifecycle management is the core enabler for product and process innovation. PLM is rapidly expanding outward from engineering and manufacturing, gaining credibility and traction in every phase and discipline across the product lifecycle. In other words, PLM is no longer constrained by organizational charts or departmental “silos of expertise.” PLM’s enabling solutions create and manage field service, warranties, software and technology development, new processes, and better workflows throughout today’s extended enterprise. The use of extended here means business partners, key suppliers, employees and other stakeholders, lenders, and even regulators.

Extended enterprise and implementing PLM across multiple silos is presented as a fundamental element of lifecycle management and product innovation platforms. Will PLM actually improve processes by breaking organization silos and setting up a single system for everyone in the organization? I’m not sure about it…

Silo is a very tricky thing. The lazy mantra of breaking silos can have lot of consequences because it can actually destroy organizational processes and damage execution structure in the company. This is one of those things you don’t want to change, otherwise organization functions will be damaged. So, what is wrong with silos? Aren’t they bad as we’ve been saying for many years? Actually they are not as bad as data silos.

Data silos can prevent organization to make data driven decisions by relying on trusted sources of information. Connect service and support data to manufacturing and engineering information. In a traditional organization each of these silos has its own data representation. EBOM, MBOM, SBOM, XBOM… Each of these organizational silos defines its own process and this is fine. However, the real problem is when organizational silos are starting to rely on their own part of information and this is will make them bad. Each department or organization should be able to “stay on the same BOM” by connecting information puzzle and breaking data silos.

Why PLM vendors are so much focused on breaking silos? My hunch the core problem here is about data  control. Each of silos has a right to control data and prevent from other people (but mostly applications) to access it.By doing so, vendors are preventing other companies to come and re-use data across silos.

What is my conclusion? Keep process and organizational silos, but break data silos. This is should be a new mantra by new PLM organization in 21st century. How to help designers, manufacturing planners and support engineers to stay on the same BOM? By resolving this problem, organization will preserve current functional structure, but will make their decisions extremely data drive and efficient. The new role of PLM is to keep organizational and process silos, but connect data silos. This is a place where new cloud based multi-tenant technologies will play key role in the future organization transformation from the vision of no silo extended enterprise to organized functional silos connected by common understanding of data. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Want to learn more about PLM? Check out my new PLM Book website.

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased.

 

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
22 April, 2015

I’m following Aras PLM annual event online this week – ACE2015. There is a moderate volume of tweets coming from...

7 December, 2015

Platform. It is a very confusing term. What is platform and how to define it. Is it just about the...

21 November, 2019

AU2019 is in a full swing. I attended the general keynote session yesterday. From my experience, Andrew Anagnost, CEO of...

15 September, 2014

The aim of PLM is to improve product development processes and lifecycle. One of the biggest challenges to make it...

23 April, 2009

Lately, I’ve seen a potential for a growth in Master Data Management (MDM) initiatives. For those who don’t know MDM...

26 January, 2011

This week SolidWorks presents the new product SolidWorks n!Fuze. The actual presentation didn’t happen yet. Today is the 3rd day...

3 October, 2014

Large infrastructure cloud providers are slashing prices. TechCrunch article Nobody Can Win The Cloud Pricing Wars is providing some additional details...

29 June, 2017

Earlier today, I was honored to be a keynote speaker at CONTACT Software Open World 2017 user event in Fulda,...

3 January, 2019

Holiday season is almost done and now is the time to get back and focus on business. And as we...

Blogroll

To the top