A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Will “low code” save PLM from customization and make it more open?

Will “low code” save PLM from customization and make it more open?
Oleg
Oleg
18 July, 2019 | 3 min for reading

Have you heard about low-code development platforms? You better pay attention to low-code, since this cool buzzword and actually tools are coming to PLM space. Here is the Wikipedia version of what is LCDP. Check this out and draw your opinion.

Low-code development platform. … A low-code development platform (LCDP) is software that provides environment programmers use to create application software through graphical user interfaces and configuration instead of traditional computer programming.

G2 gives you a long list of LCDP. Check it out here. You can see various tools from a pure software development environment to workflow management tools. You can also see Mendix listed, which was recently acquired by Siemens PLM.

“Innovative MindSphere applications are being created everyday by Siemens, our partners and our customers,’” said Tony Hemmelgarn, President and CEO at Siemens Digital Industries Software. “With technology from Mendix, we can empower customers, regardless of technology background, to use low-code development to transform the way they approach and solve business problems. Adding the ability to create native MindSphere applications using the Mendix no-code/low-code approach can provide capabilities that are unmatched by any other industrial IoT provider.”

Recent Aras press release says the following:

In Version 12, Aras continues to extend the platform’s modeling engine by adding new low-code capabilities called the Content Modeling Framework and Technical Documents Framework. These enable the creation of sophisticated data models composed of content at the paragraph, section and field level. The related items are collectively treated as a single entity for the creation and management of documents with impact analysis of changes.

The low code made think about PLM customization and configurations (http://beyondplm.com/2015/10/06/plm-configuration-v-customization-lets-sort-it-out/). In the old days, you had to compile code to customize the PDM/PLM environment. These days are gone, but some legacy PLM systems are still around. For the last decade, configurable and flexible PLM was trending as a key requirement to provide a sustainable and resilient solution. It looks like low-code can be the next step. However, it is important to understand the details and implications. Both Mendix and Aras are coming with low-code messages they actually do different things.

Here is Mendix tour video:

I wasn’t able to find a short video of Aras Content Modeling Framework. Check this long demo if you have time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJnH7nA5-oU

What is my conclusion? Mendix and Aras represent two different approaches to flexible development environments. In my view, Menix will be more “developer” oriented environment, while Aras is more administrator oriented environment. The questions I still have is how to deploy applications and what dependencies of these environments on the platform for both Mendix and Aras. A long time ago VBA was a platform for fast development inside Microsoft Office applications. It required you to code but provided a lot of flexibility and tools. Some CAD applications gave you a lot of flexibility and tools to build own applications. So, the idea of easy configuration, customization, and building apps is not entirely new. A new question – will low code save PLM from customizing and integrations? I don’t think so. The diversity of requirements and applications is still very high. At the same time, these are interesting tools to watch. And they are making platforms and tools more open. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing cloud-based bill of materials and inventory management tool for manufacturing companies, hardware startups, and supply chain. My opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
2 September, 2013

It has been long time since I discussed PLM and social trend on my blog. Social is going mainstream these...

28 May, 2019

I’ve been catching up on reading during the past long weekend in U.S. GrabCAD article – The Need for Cloud-Based...

28 June, 2024

Earlier this week, I was talking to one of our prospects – large industrial company that was looking for a...

2 February, 2018

Small manufacturing companies and enterprises always presented a weak point in the landscape of PLM implementations. While complex organizations demonstrated...

26 September, 2014

One of the heavily debated topics in CAD/PLM industry is data interoperability. I remember discussion about data interoperability and standards...

17 July, 2013

Excel is one of the most widely accepted PLM systems. PLM vendors and consultants may disagree with this strong statement....

31 August, 2009

Interesting prompt today came out of Google’s US7,580,568 “Methods and Systems for Identifying an Image as a Representative Image for...

21 February, 2021

The data is a new oil. This is a mantra of modern business, products, and technologies. Big tech companies built...

2 March, 2015

PDM was long time a step child for many CAD systems. To deal with CAD files, their relationships and dependencies...

Blogroll

To the top