A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

AI-Powered CCB Agent: Transforming Engineering Change Management with Intelligent Automation

AI-Powered CCB Agent: Transforming Engineering Change Management with Intelligent Automation
Oleg
Oleg
23 January, 2025 | 3 min for reading

Remember the old Change Control Boards (CCBs)? These teams in manufacturing reviewed and approved changes to product designs, processes, or documents. They brought together people from engineering, manufacturing, quality, and other areas to ensure changes were well-planned and didn’t harm production or quality.

While traditional CCBs played a key role, their manual, time-consuming processes often caused delays. Many companies adopted product lifecycle management (PLM) software with virtual “Workflows” to mimic CCB operations. But even these systems face challenges: they’re often engineering-focused, making it difficult to get product data from a PLM system and other product data management tools and assess impacts across other departments or customers. The broad access to business processes, document management, quality management, business systems, service lifecycle management, supply chain management, and get up to date information is crtical.

This growing complexity is a common frustration among manufacturers. Old PLM solutions are not capable to provide this level of support and modern PLM software is needed.

Introducing OpenAI’s Operator

Launching in January 2025, OpenAI’s Operator represents a big step forward. This AI agent can access and work with applications on your computer, gathering and analyzing information quickly and accurately. It simplifies collaboration and automates tasks with minimal human intervention. Check out the video here: Operator Demo.

Operator’s ability to streamline workflows could make CCB processes faster, smarter, and more efficient. But it’s no magic wand—success depends on connecting AI to the right applications and workflows.

AI-Powered CCB Agent: A New Way to Manage Change

Back to my articles from the last month, I was talking about collaborative workspace and how it can help to everyone to consolidate information and perform impact analysis. Here are a few links to my articles. You can start here – Collaborative Workspace and AI Agents.

Let’s think about new product development process that can be empowered by AI agent models. An AI-powered CCB agent (inspired by Open AI Operator), could automate key tasks in change management:

  • Automatically collect and organize change request data.
  • Perform initial impact assessments with high accuracy.
  • Route requests to the right stakeholders.
  • Track and manage approvals.
  • Provide real-time analytics on the change process.

Moving from Applications to Data and Small Language Models

The idea of introducing AI agents that can operate with multiple applications one more time demonstrate the diminishing roles of applications and increased value of data. This is a moment to start thinking what data models will support the operation of the data and how AI agents will get this data from multiple sources.

This is why graph data models and product knowledge graph will become extremely imporant in the future to allow to AI agents to get data in a meaningful way.

What is my conclusion?

I think 2025 will be dream come true moment for many places to rethink how we work with the data (instead of clunky old PLM and other enterprise applications). The AI CCB agent (just an idea) isn’t about replacing humans but supporting them. But by combing data using small language model it might open the door for better organizational performance, especially in the field that such a complex like Engineering change management.

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m the co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM, a digital-thread platform providing cloud-native PDM, PLM, and ERP capabilities. With extensive experience in federated CAD-PDM and PLM architecture, I’m advocates for agile, open product models and cloud technologies in manufacturing. My opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
10 November, 2017

Earlier this year, I learned from CIMdata that cloud PLM is not doing very well. CIMdata announced collaborative research sponsored...

14 October, 2020

There is a bad word in PLM jargon and it is “customizations”. For years, customization was considered as a bad...

12 January, 2011

There is one topic that always raises lots of controversy, in my view. I’m talking about integrations or even more...

13 June, 2016

Cloud is coming to CAD and design world. Slowly, but surely CAD vendors are getting more interested in how to...

11 November, 2017

How to overlay competitors. In my view, this is a new name in CAD / PLM competition game. It has...

11 April, 2017

Speed and complexity. These are two main challenges for every PLM implementation. So, much was said about this topic in...

10 October, 2012

I want to talk about hardware today. You probably surprised, but I hope not so much. During the last 10-15...

3 July, 2015

Aras is probably doing something right. At least this is an immediate thought that comes to my mind when I...

16 November, 2015

More than 10 years ago, I had a conversation with one of telecom manufacturing companies in Europe. I asked –...

Blogroll

To the top