
Digital transformation is changing the world. It comes to our everyday lives and businesses. In my earlier articles I touched multiple aspects of how digital transformation strategy can change manufacturing businesses. When it comes to engineering and manufacturing systems (for me they are both under the umbrella of PLM), I can see one of the most fundamental change is transformation of a single source of truth concept. We are moving from systems and applications to data. The old concept in managing SSOT is hard achieve, therefore, I can see how data-driven strategies can help manufacturing companies to solve the problem of complexity and to support the digital evolution and digital transformation initiatives from siloed data to new interconnected holistic product models. For the last decade, CAD and PLM industry also learned a lot from developing of the first generation of cloud based systems.
In my article PLM Intelligence and how to explain digital transformation, I outlined main elements of the future PLM platform software.
Prof Dr. Martin Eigner published an interesting post in his LinkedIn account discussing opportunities and obstacles in digital transformation strategy of engineering systems. Here is an interesting passage:
Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) is a strategic concept that lays the foundation for the digitalization of engineering. It addresses organization, processes, methods, infrastructure, and tools for managing a product over its entire lifecycle. With the constant expansion of the functional scope of PLM, AI, and new software technologies, there is high implementation potential with opportunities for product and process optimization.
However, there are obstacles to achieving the objective of implementing an interdisciplinary engineering backbone along the entire lifecycle. Providers promise too much, and users tend to select “best in function” instead of “best in integration” and customize their system in detail like a German midrange car- The constant conflict between PLM and ERP for sovereignty over the overall process further complicates matters.
In today’s rapidly evolving technological landscape, engineering industries are experiencing a profound digital transformation. Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) systems play a pivotal role in this paradigm shift, enabling organizations to streamline their processes, enhance collaboration, and optimize product development from conception to disposal. However, with opportunities come challenges. Let’s explore five opportunities and five obstacles for PLM in engineering digital transformation.
Here is the list of five opportunities I can see for digital transformation efforts in engineering and manufacturing systems (aka PLM):
Below you can see obstacles that can slow down digital transformation initiatives in business processes an business models related to product lifecycle management (PLM).
Digital transformation brings opportunities to PLM software. The biggest opportunity is to capitalize on data openness, integration, collaboration and future benefits of AI. The core element of this opportunity is modern data management architecture allowing to connect multiple systems together, to capture data semantics and enable building of digital thread. One of the critical elements to capture this opportunity is to establish a business model to support system openness. The biggest obstacles of digital transformation are related to organizational change management, lack of APIs and complexity of integrations.
By capitalizing on opportunities such as end-to-end integration, data-driven decision-making, and collaborative innovation, organizations can unlock new levels of efficiency, agility, and sustainability. Obstacles such as legacy systems integration, change management, and data security concerns requires proactive strategies and diligent execution.
Ultimately, successful PLM implementation for digital transformation can only rely on on a holistic approach that addresses technological, organizational, and cultural dimensions of digital transformation.
Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg
Disclaimer: I’m co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM developing a digital-thread platform with cloud-native PDM & PLM capabilities to manage product data lifecycle and connect manufacturers, construction companies, and their supply chain networks. My opinion can be unintentionally biased.
144 Search Result for: monolithic
Let’s talk about PLM architecture. A recent post and comments by Andreas Lindenthal triggered a fresh wave of discussion around...
A few days ago, I wrote about Data Products. It’s an interesting trend that, in my view, can push new...
Summer is a great time to catch up on PLM reading. What is on the top of the mind of...
The discussion about PLM as a business and PLM as a software are not new. When someone asks me about...
I was catching up on social media reading over the weekend, and my attention was caught by Matthias Ahrens post...
Last year, I published the article 5 Steps To Break up Monolithic PLM Architecture. Please check it out. In the...
Enterprise PLM architecture is a critical component of any manufacturing organization’s overall strategy, as it helps to align technology with...
Manufacturing is in the midst of a digital transformation. And it means that the industry is changing. For more than...
Steve Porter’s article Best in Show- Can ERP Providers do PLM? is a throwback in the mood of thinking about...
In my earlier blog I demystified the notion of “monolithic” PLM marketing and shared some technological aspects related to PLM...
In the past “monolithic” thing has a strong association with a power. Wikipedia article – List of largest monoliths brings...
PLM is getting more competitive these days. Cloud technology development, SaaS applications and new business models injected competitive energy between...