A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Can We Disassemble Monolithic PLM Platforms into Data Products?

Can We Disassemble Monolithic PLM Platforms into Data Products?
Oleg
Oleg
6 February, 2025 | 3 min for reading

A few days ago, I wrote about Data Products. It’s an interesting trend that, in my view, can push new application development for engineering and manufacturing. For the last 20 years, we’ve seen the rise of increasingly large “platforms.” While these platforms offer extensive capabilities, they also create adoption challenges.

Think about how easy it is to use an iPhone app. Now compare that to an enterprise application. The contrast is stark. Enterprise applications are often complex, requiring extensive training and configuration before delivering value. So, how can we make enterprise applications easier to adopt?

Data Products and the Challenge of Data Modeling

One possible answer lies in Data Products. The idea is simple—break down monolithic PLM systems into smaller, more focused data services. These services can be easier to integrate and adopt. However, data modeling is a tricky part of this transition. How do we make data interoperable and self-explanatory?

Traditional PLM architectures often struggle with rigid data structures, making it hard to share and integrate data across different systems. A more flexible and connected approach is needed to make Data Products successful.

The Role of Graph Models

Graph models offer a promising solution. Unlike traditional databases, which separate data from its structure, graph models define both data and relationships using the same language. This makes it easier to connect, query, and analyze data across multiple domains.

A great example of this approach is discussed in the article From a Monolithic PLM Landscape to a Federated Domain and Data Mesh by Y. Hooshmand, J. Resch, P. Wischnewski, and P. Patil. The paper explores how OWL/RDF technologies can define data models that form a foundation for applications.

Screenshot

The key takeaway is that alternative data modeling techniques can offer more flexibility in managing and using engineering and manufacturing data.

The Next Step: Graph-Based Models for Data Products

Taking this idea further, we can think about using graph-based models to power Data Products. Each data service can be interoperable through a graph-based approach tailored to specific datasets. This approach allows companies to absorb data from multiple sources and turn it into targeted data services for specific business needs—such as Engineering Change Order (ECO) reviews, BOM cost analysis, or impact analysis.

By providing companies with graph-based data services, we enable them to move away from rigid, monolithic platforms and towards a more agile and connected data architecture. The result? Faster adoption, better data interoperability, and more powerful insights.

What is my conclusion?

To truly modernize enterprise applications in manufacturing, we need to rethink PLM data architecture. Moving away from monolithic PLM systems and embracing Data Products powered by graph-based models can unlock new possibilities. This shift enables companies to build modular, interoperable data services that make engineering and manufacturing data more accessible and actionable.

The future of PLM isn’t about building bigger platforms. It’s about creating smarter, more connected data services.

Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Disclaimer: I’m the co-founder and CEO of OpenBOM, a digital-thread platform providing Collaborative Workspace with PDM, PLM, and ERP capabilities. With extensive experience in federated CAD-PDM and PLM architecture, I’m advocates for agile, open product models and cloud technologies in manufacturing. My opinion can be unintentionally biased.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
2 December, 2011

It finally happened. Autodesk enters PLM business. After talks, speculations, discussions and guesses, Autodesk presented their Autodesk Nexus PLM product...

13 December, 2018

Talk to many people about PLM and they tell you that process management is one of the key elements in...

12 May, 2009

The latest trends in software development definitely lean towards simplification. People tend to avoid complex stuff. I think most of...

23 July, 2009

Very Loud Prompt- Google building 3D hardware boost into Chrome. Brad Chen, engineering manager of the Google Native Client said...

1 July, 2011

This week was packed with multiple announcements and events. One of them happened in Paris – first Dassault Application Innovation...

27 October, 2011

Earlier this week, my attention was caught the article Cloud is Dead by Ralph Grabowski. Following some of Ralph’s thoughts,...

13 November, 2021

For the last two decades, PLM was developed in the well-established business strategy, product, and technology discipline. A lot can...

14 September, 2019

For the last several weeks, we had a few very interesting discussions about PLM standards. Manufacturing companies are demanding standards...

4 January, 2021

Manufacturing has been used PLM for a long time to track and manage product data design and changes in the...

Blogroll

To the top