A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why PLM Scares Me?

Why PLM Scares Me?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
11 August, 2009 | 2 min for reading

Following my previous post about how PLM can go to mainstream, I had chance to discuss this topic with some of my colleagues. We came to some initial conclusions that I’d like to share with my blog readers. Let me put upfront some assumption with regards to main trends I see happens in computer industry and enterprise software.

One of them is a trend for “simplicity”.  This is the biggest trend I see across many of the software systems during the past years. In my view, Google is staying first in the line and promoting the most simple user experience ever – single line. Following Google, I can mention Apple with their multiple products, also promoting simple approach. Almost in an enterprise software world, I can mention Microsoft SharePoint approach, as something maybe not very simple, but definitely less complex comparing to everything else you see around. So, my conclusion is that simplicity created strong trend toward user acceptance and understanding.

At the same time, Product Lifecycle Management became mature and prove success in companies and industries. The strategy of PLM was to move toward ability to support overall product lifecycle and because of that, PLM wanted to gather more and more processes, information, connection with other systems and people interaction. As a consequence of this PLM came to “maturity phase” and… overcomplicating. We got a system that can be deployed in global organizations, manage complex product structures, organization processes, supply chain and more. However, obvious price was big and complicated environment.

So, what happened as a result. Two trends “simplicity” and “PLM maturity” had actually different directions. User demands for simple and elegant solutions came in conflict with mature and complicated PLM deployments. What solution do I see for this situation? In my view, PLM providers understood situation and their immediate answer for short term was as following: 1/best practices; 2/industry approach; 3/education. We had chance to see these trends in strategies of all PLM providers. Would you ask me – is it enough? No, I don’t think so. I think a current “state of the art PLMs” are scaring users and prevent PLM from mainstream deployment.

Just my opinion.

Best, Oleg.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
21 May, 2010

I had chance to read the story “Is PLM software OOTB Functionality a Red Herring?” by Marc Lind on Aras’...

12 June, 2015

PI Congress is coming to Boston this year. The program just became available online and you can see it here....

28 February, 2018

For decades People, Process and Technology triad was a foundation to solve business problems. Entire frameworks  and methodologies were created...

15 January, 2013

I would like to speak about PDM today. You can hardly find engineers that like data management. For many years,...

13 February, 2013

IT consumerization speed is probably underestimated. At the time we are discussing if enterprise workers need to use tablets, mobile...

19 July, 2010

The things are moving fast these days. One of the most fascinating trends is the emerging connection between physical and...

18 January, 2013

PLM vendors are continuing to adopt cloud. I can clearly see a difference between people attitude for cloud solutions now...

8 June, 2010

Usually, when we are discussing various aspects of software, we are spending lot of time talking about technologies. However, I...

22 June, 2010

I’d suggest to have some fun in the beginning. What is PUI? Do you think this is a new PLM...

Blogroll

To the top