A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Why PLM Scares Me?

Why PLM Scares Me?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
11 August, 2009 | 2 min for reading

Following my previous post about how PLM can go to mainstream, I had chance to discuss this topic with some of my colleagues. We came to some initial conclusions that I’d like to share with my blog readers. Let me put upfront some assumption with regards to main trends I see happens in computer industry and enterprise software.

One of them is a trend for “simplicity”.  This is the biggest trend I see across many of the software systems during the past years. In my view, Google is staying first in the line and promoting the most simple user experience ever – single line. Following Google, I can mention Apple with their multiple products, also promoting simple approach. Almost in an enterprise software world, I can mention Microsoft SharePoint approach, as something maybe not very simple, but definitely less complex comparing to everything else you see around. So, my conclusion is that simplicity created strong trend toward user acceptance and understanding.

At the same time, Product Lifecycle Management became mature and prove success in companies and industries. The strategy of PLM was to move toward ability to support overall product lifecycle and because of that, PLM wanted to gather more and more processes, information, connection with other systems and people interaction. As a consequence of this PLM came to “maturity phase” and… overcomplicating. We got a system that can be deployed in global organizations, manage complex product structures, organization processes, supply chain and more. However, obvious price was big and complicated environment.

So, what happened as a result. Two trends “simplicity” and “PLM maturity” had actually different directions. User demands for simple and elegant solutions came in conflict with mature and complicated PLM deployments. What solution do I see for this situation? In my view, PLM providers understood situation and their immediate answer for short term was as following: 1/best practices; 2/industry approach; 3/education. We had chance to see these trends in strategies of all PLM providers. Would you ask me – is it enough? No, I don’t think so. I think a current “state of the art PLMs” are scaring users and prevent PLM from mainstream deployment.

Just my opinion.

Best, Oleg.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
28 November, 2016

I’ve been catching up on reading over the weekend. One of the articles caught my attention. Forbes article by Kevin...

24 July, 2015

In a swift move, Microsoft decided to reinvent email. I guess, many of you had a chance to work with Outlook...

4 August, 2009

Thank you for Jim Brown’s post yesterday. Why is implementing PLM is hard? Now, I’m officially starting my collection of...

7 March, 2018

CIMdata announced new research completion about PLM Status and trends. A quick note about it can be found here. A...

14 October, 2011

I wanted to share some of my notes from yesterday Dassault PLM forum in Moscow. Getting back to previous forums...

2 August, 2012

Cloud PLM conversation is heating up. With all pros and cons, the opinion, I can hear very often – cloud...

25 November, 2019

I’m still digesting tons of information I’ve got last week during AU2019 in Las Vegas. I will continue to share...

20 October, 2009

I’d like to continue discussion I started in my earlier post – Seven Rules Towards Single Bill of Materials. So,...

12 April, 2010

I had chance to post about the issue of complexity in enterprise systems in general and specifically about the complexity...

Blogroll

To the top