A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Who owns PLM implementation project?

Who owns PLM implementation project?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
27 August, 2009 | 2 min for reading

plm-implementation-ownershipI’m coming with new discussion related to how we can successfully implement Product Lifecycle Management. I think, this issue is as important as to have good PLM technologies and ready to use functions in a product.

However, I see PLM-related implementation project uniqueness in the following factors:

1. Cross Functional. Large diversity of people and process involved into implementation. Traditionally PLM-related activity is spanning across multiple domains in organization, which position PLM influences a significant range of operational activities.

2. R&D involved. PLM is heavy impacted by R&D and Engineering activity of organization. Engineering and Product development work is unique in the way people see how they work and from a standpoint how they want to see computer systems manage their work.

3. Tools. Large diversity of software tools and providers involved. In very rare situation company uses single vendor solution for their development practices. The reasons are many historical, product development needs, acquisitions and mergers etc. As a result corporate IT zoo for PLM implementation may be easy include several dozens of tools and components.

With this specifics how I can see a possible PLM implementation project from ownerships standpoint.

1. Corporate Ownership. The corporate ownership absolutely must have successful PLM implementations. The leader of PLM implementation should have enough power, leadership and knowledge to harmonize diverse number of stakeholders involved into implementation.

2. Service Provider Ownership.
This is very typical situation for most of PLM implementation. Additional company (in many cases can represent major vendor for this customer), is taking overall responsibilities about implementation. Were advantages are clear, the disadvantages are practically the same lock and high dependence on such service provider, ability of service provider to work with a significant number of player in the same organization in parallel.

3. PLM Consultancy. There is situation when company decided to hire PLM consultant for planning and leading of PLM implementation. This PLM consultant needs to work with corp. resources and diverse teams to lead them toward PLM implementation. Such PLM consultant can also cooperate with Service Providers to do some additional work.

What is my conclusion so far? To have strong PLM project ownership and leadership is absolutely needed to PLM implementation. There is no single recipe how to implement PLM, company needs to work on their own plan and vision for PLM implementation. Diversity of vendors and tools provide an additional complexity in PLM implementations.

These are my thoughts…What do you think about that?

Best, Oleg.

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
3 May, 2019

Engineering and manufacturing systems are enormously complex. One of the biggest reason is information complexity. An average PLM application is...

6 February, 2014

To implement PLM is a process and change. Speak to anyone in engineering and manufacturing community and they will bring...

11 December, 2022

Hardware is hard. This phrase is quite popular among people involved in the creation of manufacturing businesses or how it...

2 October, 2011

I found an interesting article about GMail – Gmail now ‘Viable Alternative’ to Microsoft, says Gartner. Gartner is well known...

31 October, 2011

Earlier, this year, I post a blog called – Integrated PDM and PLM: Wrong Question? In the beginning, this blog...

13 July, 2011

I like searching for new technologies. One of the technologies I’m following a long time already is so called “mashup...

14 August, 2012

One of the most profound ideas in the history of PLM is the idea of PLM database that contains all...

12 June, 2015

PI Congress is coming to Boston this year. The program just became available online and you can see it here....

7 March, 2012

One of the companies I’m watching is GrabCAD. Earlier, I was talking about GrabCAD’s idea of open CAD library and...

Blogroll

To the top