A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

How PLM Vendors Can Listen To Competitors?

How PLM Vendors Can Listen To Competitors?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
17 January, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Last week I had chance to read Forbes’s article (Listen To Competitors — Not Customers), which made me think more about competition in Product Lifecycle Management. I read this article few times, and, I think, found why I felt not comfortable with position of author. The definition of customers is simple. Those people or organizations which consume products your organization manufactures. If you think about new markets, it is very simple to identify who are that organization or people you need to talk to. However, with competition the situation is not as simple. The definition of competition is subjective. You can consider the specific company (or product domain) as a competitive, but in fact, this is false reality.

In my view, today’s situation on the PLM market characterized by a very small amount of vendors that fight on the lucrative space of the specific services. At the same time, mainstream adoption of PLM is still a very significant problem. For the last decade, number of companies playing on PDM/PLM market decreased due to competitive acquisitions. If you will be listening to the PLM marketing, you can be confused by similarity of offering and messages. So, to realize a potential listening to the competitors the process of competitor’s selection need to be much different and going beyond Gartner Magic Quadrant.

So, what is my conclusion today? Discovering multiple ideas surrounding Product Lifecycle Management, I found many times that customer’s perspective on technology and product positioning is quite different from mainstream marketing presentations. Thus, you can find something, I’d call “alternative” and not “competition” to PLM. So, with such correction, I think, PLM companies need to watch alternatives to their solutions- it will create more balanced view and will focus on the competitiveness and ways to provide value to customers.

Just my thoughts…
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
23 November, 2019

Acquisitions are part of every industry development these days. Usually, it is a major event in the company, product, technology,...

6 October, 2010

Yesterday, I touched a topic of connection between CAD and PLM. The discussion started by Peter Schroer of Aras and...

12 December, 2016

Data is the next oil. The last decade of software development demonstrated huge potential of data driven approach in many...

9 November, 2015

It has been few months since I published my first comparison between PLM cloud services provided by different CAD, PLM...

31 October, 2017

Engineering.com article – A Big Win as Yamaha “Does a Daimler” and Chooses Siemens PLM brings up big debates about Dassault...

4 January, 2010

It’s over. 2009… The loooooong weekend was a perfect time to think about last year, summarize, statistics, reviews, read an...

25 February, 2018

One of my readers, asked me earlier today why PLM ISVs are not talking much about paradigm shift. I thought...

17 October, 2013

All roads lead to Rome. Sometimes, I have a feeling whatever discussion happens in CAD, engineering and manufacturing world, it...

20 February, 2014

Business is going global. It is not only for large manufacturing companies these days. As a result of cost pressure...

Blogroll

To the top