A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

What We Are Losing By Going From CAD to PLM?

What We Are Losing By Going From CAD to PLM?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
19 January, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Do you remember the time before PLM? Time, when our focus was about CAD and Product Data Management? With all latest developments around Product Lifecycle Management and collaborative business processes, I think we lost some important grounds related to the critical data management issues related to engineering and product development.

CAD and related Design solutions is the biggest source of engineering data produced in the organization. For the last decades CAD and other design-related systems produced huge amount of engineering data – models, drawings, bill of materials, analyzes and more… These pieces of data are very critical to the organization from the standpoint of making product related decisions.

On the other side, product lifecycle management is running forward and shifting focus on how to optimize business processes in the organization. The new PLM solutions is very focused on how to define and run organizational processes related to product design, manufacturing, support, disposal, etc.

But here is the point. I think these two pieces become more and more disconnected. By shifting focus on the process-oriented environment vendors are losing their grounds in data management. Today design and related product knowledge is pretty locked in the systems that used to produce this information. PLM systems are not focusing on how to make this information managed and available inside of the enterprise. The solutions like 3DVIA composer, PTC Arbotext, Autodesk Inventor Publisher are good initial signs, but they are too much focused on geometry and very little on data.

What is my conclusion today? PLM is too much focused on how to capture processes and make it visible on CIO level. It obviously comes from the interest to compete with existing ERP and other solutions. However, on that way PLM is losing some core business related to the ability properly manage product and design data. We need to get back to product management roots and analyze what we still need to accomplish there.

Just my thought…
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
7 October, 2010

I read a blog post by Stephen Porter of Zero Wait State called – The PLM State: Why can’t we...

11 January, 2026

My attention last week came across the news about Anthropic donating the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to an open foundation,...

23 April, 2021

Earlier this week, I attended ACE2021. It was the second Aras conference completely virtual. Last year, Aras was one of...

11 November, 2017

How to overlay competitors. In my view, this is a new name in CAD / PLM competition game. It has...

31 July, 2014

Do you remember “throw over the wall of manufacturing” statement? This is a traditional engineering world. Pretty much sequential. Engineers...

19 January, 2019

My recent article Can we liberate product data from PLM vendors and dissolve it with digital thread raised a good number...

14 June, 2019

I’ve been asked many times why I like CAD and PLM? One of the main reasons – connection to real-world...

13 October, 2010

In any enterprise software, there is a point of time we are asking the following question – “what APIs are...

8 January, 2025

I often talk with engineering teams and manufacturing companies about PLM implementation. A common approach I hear about is called...

Blogroll

To the top