A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

What We Are Losing By Going From CAD to PLM?

What We Are Losing By Going From CAD to PLM?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
19 January, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Do you remember the time before PLM? Time, when our focus was about CAD and Product Data Management? With all latest developments around Product Lifecycle Management and collaborative business processes, I think we lost some important grounds related to the critical data management issues related to engineering and product development.

CAD and related Design solutions is the biggest source of engineering data produced in the organization. For the last decades CAD and other design-related systems produced huge amount of engineering data – models, drawings, bill of materials, analyzes and more… These pieces of data are very critical to the organization from the standpoint of making product related decisions.

On the other side, product lifecycle management is running forward and shifting focus on how to optimize business processes in the organization. The new PLM solutions is very focused on how to define and run organizational processes related to product design, manufacturing, support, disposal, etc.

But here is the point. I think these two pieces become more and more disconnected. By shifting focus on the process-oriented environment vendors are losing their grounds in data management. Today design and related product knowledge is pretty locked in the systems that used to produce this information. PLM systems are not focusing on how to make this information managed and available inside of the enterprise. The solutions like 3DVIA composer, PTC Arbotext, Autodesk Inventor Publisher are good initial signs, but they are too much focused on geometry and very little on data.

What is my conclusion today? PLM is too much focused on how to capture processes and make it visible on CIO level. It obviously comes from the interest to compete with existing ERP and other solutions. However, on that way PLM is losing some core business related to the ability properly manage product and design data. We need to get back to product management roots and analyze what we still need to accomplish there.

Just my thought…
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
4 December, 2008

Jos Voskuil is blogging about ERP alternative for PLM. This is quite interesting question that can be split into two...

30 November, 2008

If company business processes need to be re-engineered it’s a management decision. Now the question is if we would like...

29 January, 2015

Cloud file sharing and collaboration tools are booming. To store and share files on one of the cloud file sharing...

27 January, 2009

I’d like to open a series of discussions related to business intelligence and PLM. I had a chance to speak...

23 July, 2009

Very Loud Prompt- Google building 3D hardware boost into Chrome. Brad Chen, engineering manager of the Google Native Client said...

15 September, 2014

The aim of PLM is to improve product development processes and lifecycle. One of the biggest challenges to make it...

7 June, 2011

I want to talk about the topic, which is actually is not very new – revisions. I was reading Autodesk...

8 December, 2011

I’m sure, you are familiar with highway 101 crossing Silicon Valley. However, you probably never heard about PLM Highway in...

13 March, 2013

Implementation of enterprise information systems is a long and painful process. It requires a lot of efforts, investments and planning....

Blogroll

To the top