A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

What We Are Losing By Going From CAD to PLM?

What We Are Losing By Going From CAD to PLM?
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
19 January, 2010 | 2 min for reading

Do you remember the time before PLM? Time, when our focus was about CAD and Product Data Management? With all latest developments around Product Lifecycle Management and collaborative business processes, I think we lost some important grounds related to the critical data management issues related to engineering and product development.

CAD and related Design solutions is the biggest source of engineering data produced in the organization. For the last decades CAD and other design-related systems produced huge amount of engineering data – models, drawings, bill of materials, analyzes and more… These pieces of data are very critical to the organization from the standpoint of making product related decisions.

On the other side, product lifecycle management is running forward and shifting focus on how to optimize business processes in the organization. The new PLM solutions is very focused on how to define and run organizational processes related to product design, manufacturing, support, disposal, etc.

But here is the point. I think these two pieces become more and more disconnected. By shifting focus on the process-oriented environment vendors are losing their grounds in data management. Today design and related product knowledge is pretty locked in the systems that used to produce this information. PLM systems are not focusing on how to make this information managed and available inside of the enterprise. The solutions like 3DVIA composer, PTC Arbotext, Autodesk Inventor Publisher are good initial signs, but they are too much focused on geometry and very little on data.

What is my conclusion today? PLM is too much focused on how to capture processes and make it visible on CIO level. It obviously comes from the interest to compete with existing ERP and other solutions. However, on that way PLM is losing some core business related to the ability properly manage product and design data. We need to get back to product management roots and analyze what we still need to accomplish there.

Just my thought…
Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
21 July, 2013

There is a chasm between old and new schoolers these days in many places and industries. I wonder if PLM...

5 July, 2022

How do you envision the future of PLM data modeling? In my earlier posts, I was talking about some of...

17 August, 2011

PLM User Experience… Yes, I know. This is a painful point. Everybody wants it simpler, intuitive and easy. My best...

26 February, 2012

Earlier, this week, I’ve been attending PLM Innovation Congress 2012 in Munich. If you haven’t had a chance to read...

29 April, 2009

Yes, I have come to the conclusion that the Bill of Materials (BOM) child is quite alone… probably because the...

7 January, 2009

When I posted about my Dream PLM Technologies for 2009 , one of them was  Persistent Content. In today’s word, I...

4 November, 2014

I’ve been talking about future of cloud file system and CAD data trajectories the other day on my blog. It...

28 July, 2024

In my recent article about the growing importance of Manufacturing BOM (MBOM) management, I explored various integration methods between CAD,...

22 July, 2009

I’m looking on SolidJott plug-in for SolidWorks. My opinion, that social tools need to be integrated into CAD environment. The...

Blogroll

To the top