A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Manufacturer Priorities and PLM Integration Lock

Manufacturer Priorities and PLM Integration Lock
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
21 March, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I have chance to listed AMR’s Mike Burket interview during Siemens PLM Innovation Summit. It seems to me as a very interesting talk and slides about current PLM priorities. You can see it on this link. Thanks Dora Smith for this nice blog post, video and slides. One of the key requirements coming from manufacturers today are around cost reduction, better integration operation and product development as well as improvements in a supply value chain.

I counted two issues that, in my view, can be considered as very old requirements and demanded by many customers long time:
1. Design to Manufacturing Processes
2. Supporting of segmentation in Supply Chain.

On the one side, you can think about them as two separate issues. However, these two issues share one common fundamental problem of PLM systems. The problem is how to organize  integrated cross organizational processes. If you will take a look on the following slide presented by Mike, the need for integration is something that I see as a must requirement to link demand insight, product development and supply networks.

Listening Mike it becomes almost clear that process integration will become the next PLM challenge. However, here is my point. Unfortunately, integration is a very expensive job. All integrated projects I know, took a lot of time, resources and, in my view, doesn’t fit IT budgets. The issue of reduced IT budgets makes this problem even more important and critical. Many of today’s PLM integrated projects were possible only due to result of long and dedicated work done by vendors, services providers and organizations.

What is my conclusion? There is no magic outside of powerpoint slides. Integration is hard. Nobody can do it easy today. Big PLM systems provide a comprehensive product development environment, but they are not adaptable for lean cross-organizational process integration. How to find a way to reduce PLM integrated project cost and improve the agility of product development environment? This is sounds as a deadlock and the biggest challenge for manufacturers and PLM vendors in coming future.

Just my opinion.
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
12 April, 2011

Following my yesterday post about Facebook and data centers infrastructure, I thought it will be an interesting to discover more...

18 April, 2016

Integration is a popular word in PLM. It is a good word. It gives you a good taste and promise...

19 May, 2020

Last week I shared my thoughts about What platform is needed for Digital Thread? Thanks for your comments and discussion...

8 October, 2015

Did you pay attention what happened to cloud storage? I’m sure you did. The cost is racing to zero. You...

30 October, 2014

Enterprise IT adoption cycle diagram made by Simon Wardley made me feel sad and funny at the same time. I found...

9 January, 2021

Aras is one of the companies I’m continuously following for quite a while. Alongside interesting architecture, Aras is also innovative...

20 October, 2015

Technology is moving forward. The last wave of the development in cloud and mobile technologies, data management and collaboration created...

5 March, 2014

PLM and ERP have long “love and hate” relationships in manufacturing world. You can find lots of materials speaking about...

3 December, 2009

Common definition of the process: “a set of activities leading to the desired outcome.” Despite such a simple and straightforward...

Blogroll

To the top