A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Manufacturer Priorities and PLM Integration Lock

Manufacturer Priorities and PLM Integration Lock
olegshilovitsky
olegshilovitsky
21 March, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I have chance to listed AMR’s Mike Burket interview during Siemens PLM Innovation Summit. It seems to me as a very interesting talk and slides about current PLM priorities. You can see it on this link. Thanks Dora Smith for this nice blog post, video and slides. One of the key requirements coming from manufacturers today are around cost reduction, better integration operation and product development as well as improvements in a supply value chain.

I counted two issues that, in my view, can be considered as very old requirements and demanded by many customers long time:
1. Design to Manufacturing Processes
2. Supporting of segmentation in Supply Chain.

On the one side, you can think about them as two separate issues. However, these two issues share one common fundamental problem of PLM systems. The problem is how to organize  integrated cross organizational processes. If you will take a look on the following slide presented by Mike, the need for integration is something that I see as a must requirement to link demand insight, product development and supply networks.

Listening Mike it becomes almost clear that process integration will become the next PLM challenge. However, here is my point. Unfortunately, integration is a very expensive job. All integrated projects I know, took a lot of time, resources and, in my view, doesn’t fit IT budgets. The issue of reduced IT budgets makes this problem even more important and critical. Many of today’s PLM integrated projects were possible only due to result of long and dedicated work done by vendors, services providers and organizations.

What is my conclusion? There is no magic outside of powerpoint slides. Integration is hard. Nobody can do it easy today. Big PLM systems provide a comprehensive product development environment, but they are not adaptable for lean cross-organizational process integration. How to find a way to reduce PLM integrated project cost and improve the agility of product development environment? This is sounds as a deadlock and the biggest challenge for manufacturers and PLM vendors in coming future.

Just my opinion.
Best, Oleg

Share

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
3 September, 2021

Data is one of the most valuable assets of the 21st century and businesses are desperately looking for how to...

14 June, 2020

Unless you lived under the rock, you’ve heard about SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS. If you will try to figure out...

20 November, 2012

Are you familiar with PLM platform diagrams? You can see lots of them in presentations, marketing materials, websites and conferences....

15 January, 2023

Is cloud PLM becoming mainstream for enterprise applications? The year 2022 was an interesting year in the cloud and SaaS...

22 October, 2021

Technologies are simple, but people are hard. I’ve heard this phrase from somebody more than a decade ago and I...

4 December, 2022

Recessions offer major opportunities for everyone who likes to innovate. Engineering or sales, strategy, and tactic – there are usually...

3 November, 2016

Change management and PLM implementations are hard. You can check some of my earlier blogs to catch up on the...

26 November, 2011

I’m coming to AU 2011 this year. As you already know, Autodesk is planning to unveil their PLM story. In...

14 December, 2020

Last month I attended CIMdata virtual event 2020 PDT and PLM Roadmap. I’m still slowly skimming the slides and connecting...

Blogroll

To the top