A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Does PLM have a chance to win over ERP dominant position?

Does PLM have a chance to win over ERP dominant position?
Oleg
Oleg
5 March, 2014 | 3 min for reading

plm-erp-cloud-compete

PLM and ERP have long “love and hate” relationships in manufacturing world. You can find lots of materials speaking about complementary roles of PLM and ERP. This is of course true. However, integration between PLM and ERP never been easy. Despite many technologies, systems and solutions available on the market, customers are often skeptical about ease of integration between these systems. My hunch, ERP and PLM are clashing over the data that both system supposed to manage such as Bill of Materials. One of my older articles speaks about The ugly truth about PLM-ERP monkey volleyball. I think beyond specific data and process management aspects both ERP and PLM vendors are competing for “CIO priority” in the company.

In my view, the net-net after almost two decades of competition: ERP more often is taking dominant position in the company. At the same time, PDM and PLM have more challenging position to expand system usage beyond engineering and R&D organizations downstream. The situation is obviously different between larger and smaller companies. The problem of integration between ERP and PLM is dominant for large OEMs and suppliers. The problem of PLM cost and decision to use both PLM and ERP among departments is more critical for smaller manufacturers.

Cloud computing is one of the largest and most disruptive technological trends these days. Cloud certainly disrupted many existing domains. We can see a lot of cloud disruption in enterprise domain these days. CMSWire article Will Disruptive Cloud Computing Kill Enterprise Resource Planning? is specifically focusing on how cloud tech can disrupt ERP domain. Read the article and make your opinion. Article references Gartner study – Predicts 2014: The Rise of the Postmodern ERP and Enterprise Applications World (you need to pay to get access). Here is an interesting passage:

According to the report the problems that are impacting on ERP are historic. In fact, they go back nearly 20 years. From the mid-1990s, enterprises invested in ERP solutions because they addressed problems that had been inherited from the 1980s, when systems were not reliable enough and did not integrate with newer applications. However, many of these service provides went beyond implementations. They provided extensive customizations on top of the work that was outlined on the licenses, with many setting up software factories with thousands of programmers to provide those customizations. The net result of 15 years of continuous customization, the report added, are ERP implementations that are now “arthritic,” incredibly slow and expensive to change

Gartner is also making prediction about future development of ERP solutions and transforming of large monolithic suites into set of smaller and flexible application services:

Longer term, over the next 10 years and more, we envision a scenario where more of the market ‘flips’ to the cloud. Instead of having on-premises core solutions that are complemented by innovation or differentiating processes being supported in the cloud, some organizations will move all their ERP functionality to the cloud. These won’t be single vendor mega-suites but instead will be loosely coupled suites of cloud functionality,” Nigel Rayner, co-author of the report said.

This prediction made me think about potential transformation in the balance between PLM and ERP systems (or maybe services in the future). The focus on smaller adaptive services can give an opportunity to PLM vendors to provide solutions in functional areas that raised controversy and competition in the past – change management, item master management, BOM management and few others. By providing new modern cloud manufacturing applications PLM vendors will be able to takeover inflexible legacy ERP suites and integrate with other ERP services.

What is my conclusion? The disruption time is good for changes and revisiting of old status quo and decisions. The historical balance of PLM and ERP is one of them. By providing flexible and agile product lfiecyle services, existing PLM vendors and newcomers can win over the existing status in many manufacturing companies. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
30 March, 2012

This week was extremely busy. I was traveling to attend Autodesk Media Summit in San-Francisco. You can read about it...

3 December, 2012

The complexity of user interface in PLM applications is a well-known fact that acknowledged by almost all PLM vendors today....

9 February, 2015

Dear friends! I wanted to share some personal news with you. I decided to make a next change in my...

15 July, 2013

Every software application developer has a dream. This dream is to become a “platform”. This is such a sweet moment...

20 April, 2018

Bad terminology is an enemy of good thinking. A running joke in PLM industry says that if you ask what...

8 February, 2012

Earlier this week, I had a conversation with engineering IT manager of a manufacturing company. Without mentioning names, we’ve been...

14 May, 2022

Manufacturing companies are always looking for ways to improve their operations and increase efficiency. One way to do this is...

1 December, 2009

The following NYT article drove my attention yesterday – Open Source as a Model for Business is Elusive. I already...

15 February, 2016

In a traditional engineering, “over the wall” approach is a reflection of sequential operations – marketing, design, manufacturing, testing and...

Blogroll

To the top