A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM Downstream – Sent from my iPad?

PLM Downstream – Sent from my iPad?
Oleg
Oleg
6 August, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I had a chance to read “Sent from my iPad”  on VEKTORRM last week. Dave Angelotti discussed an option to use iPad as a field device. It seems interesting. It made me think about lots of un-realized options for PLM innovation in downstream. Last year, I wrote – PLM content downstream usage, Googlenomic and Futuristic Search. Looking now on this post it seems to me much less futuristic. iPad experience helps… I decided to put few “downstream scenarios” and hope to get more ideas from you.

PLM Downstream Scenarios

(1) Sales. I can see many scenarios where sales-people will be able to have an access to configured catalog of products to facilitate sales. This is a dumb simple scenario. However, the complexity of the scenario is to have it well integrated with other systems.

(2) Manufacturing Shopfloor. In my view, there is an opportunity to use it to replace printed documents on the shopfloor. Do you think it may work? I talked to few people about this option last week. They told that iPad screen size is probably too small. Or maybe we need to wait for iBoard (you can take a look on the following joke about iPhone-iPad-iBoard-iMat)?

(3) Maintenance Operation. This is another similar to manufacturing shopfloor situation. The accessibility of the device may play a key role in getting an access to the right information during maintenance procedures.

The Missing Part of Puzzle?

Do you think device is important? My bet is yes. Sometime, innovative ideas have a very long path to people. To make them possible the unique combination of events needs to happen. It might be cost of components, environment or just device or available technology. The ultimate goal is to get rid of paper from downstream. This is a real innovative goal, in my view. It makes a lot of sense from various standpoints – information access, ecology, etc. Don’t you think iPad is the missing part of Puzzle to make it happen?

What is my conclusion? From my experience, the following three iPad characteristics ultimately help to iPad proliferation in downstream – (1) Lightweight; (2) Connectivity; (3) Power consumption. I think iPad creates a significant option for PLM (and BIM) innovation in the downstream applications- sales, manufacturing facilities, field operations, etc. What I like in iPad is an ability to create a platform for lots of powerful and focused applications. Not a big PLM show, focus matters!

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
20 April, 2015

Last week at COFES 2015, I shared my thoughts and opinion about what happens between PLM and the cloud for...

8 December, 2023

In my last article about End-to-End business processes, I share some ideas about the importance of establishing connected digital processes...

31 January, 2022

In a previous blog post, I shared my thoughts about Metaverse and PLM user experience. Check this out here. PLM...

28 May, 2009

After starting a massive Excel discussion last week and continuing this week, I got a lot of comments that I...

30 December, 2016

Just few years ago “cloud PLM ” was an oxymoron. A conservative position of engineering IT was that cloud is...

24 November, 2016

I missed PDT Europe this year. But my long time PLM blogging buddy Jos Voskuil did a great job posting his...

26 January, 2017

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is having a renaissance moment these days. With the risk to disclose my age, I can remind...

6 August, 2023

For years, manufacturing companies managed the division of two disciplines PLM and ERP in a very simplistic way – PLM...

15 January, 2016

How often you communicate using various messaging applications? My hunch you might use it more often that voice call these...

Blogroll

To the top