A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

Stuck PLM Project and Leo Tolstoy

Stuck PLM Project and Leo Tolstoy
Oleg
Oleg
25 October, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I read a very short post from Aras by Jennifer McCullough of ArasFrustrated by a Stuck PLM Project?. The whole purpose of this blog is to point on the link to Stuck PLM page on Aras’ website. The Aras website is talking about license cost frustration, uncovered functionality and a problem to grow with limited budget. At the same time, it promises results.

Does it mean Aras engineers invented “Perpetuum Mobile”? No, I don’t think so. Aras engineers are making software. Aras business wizards decided to delay a painful moment of license’s fees to a later time and wrap it differently. It seems to be smart. They probably made homework in Chris Anderson’s Sunday school about the power of “FREE“. The Aras’ Stuck PLM Project story reminded my Anna Karenina roman by Leo Tolstoy. “All happy families are happy alike, every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way“. PLM marketing wizards are telling stories about “happy PLM implementations”. These stories are all the same. I think, the real implementation stories become more popular. The most interesting PLM implementation stories are about how to use a diverse set of tools to handle product development processes. When / If we will come to these stories, we have a chance to get back and talk about what tools we need to turn these stories into PLM happy stories.

What is my conclusion? Aras’ case in PLM is interesting. The important point is a sequence of events. Aras business managers are trying to put a carriage before horses. Will it work? A good question to ask. When you keep something in your hands, you can decide to give it away for free. Can it re-build a trust of potential customers frustrated from previous PLM experience? I think, it depends on what is next. If a quality of tools is good, and you have a right “set of expectations”, you can have a decent PLM free ride. You need to make it sustainable. If I need “a commute car”, I will never take an advantage of the entertainment system in the back of my limousine. If my “commute car” stack, I don’t need entertainment neither. How to have right tools to get a job done- this is a right question to ask these days. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
18 January, 2016

Over the many years of building enterprise systems, I have come to appreciate that building software product that is defined...

23 January, 2012

For most non-technology-savvy people, the title of this post can sound like a joke. Mobile apps are trending today. App...

8 March, 2013

I’d like to provoke the discussion about PLM implementations today. I assume most of your had a chance to hear...

3 June, 2018

I’ve been reading almost traditional Kleiner Perkins’ annual internet trends report delivered by Mary Meeker at Code 2018. Almost 300...

30 March, 2018

Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world. Education is a place where you...

27 July, 2011

No files any more. Period. I hope I’ve got your attention. File system is one of the most stable paradigms...

17 August, 2010

I want to continue the discussion started last week in my post ‘PDM vs. PLM: A Data Perspective‘. Thank you...

10 May, 2017

In many ways, one of the most important functions in every PLM system is a capability to interconnect multi-disciplinary data about...

20 January, 2016

Workflows is one of the fundamental elements of all PLM products today. Workflow abstraction is easy to understand to engineers...

Blogroll

To the top