A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

PLM and Google TV: Not for Average People?

PLM and Google TV: Not for Average People?
Oleg
Oleg
21 November, 2010 | 2 min for reading

I was reading NYT on my flight today. The following article made me feel bad. Google TV, Usability is Not Included. I didn’t buy Google TV yet. I’m still checking my options. Read the article and made your conclusion. The idea of turning TV screen in full scope computer screen is fascinating, but I’m thinking about the end user. Can I explain to non-computer-savvy person how to switch browser screen? Mission impossible.

PLM Complexity Trends

The complexity of the Google TV explained by NYT made me think again about some PLM implementations. How many times you’ve been facing multiple screens, options, connections. I think, PLM implementation problem lays in their fundamental interest to expose the complexity of product development processes, dependencies and data connections. Even looking on new software in the enterprise space, I can see these complexity symptoms. I figured out 3 main PLM complexity trends.

Modeling complexity
This is normally happening when engineers are trying to apply all possible and impossible combinations of data models to reflect the situation in an organization. However, in many cases, I see it as not needed. A lot of situations can be solved by applying much fewer simple models. When you build your data model, just ask engineers to simplify it. If you do it constantly, you will see that you end up with half of features.

Presentation complexity
In my view, PLM software is still keeping the previous desktop paradigm. It means to put as much as possible information in front of customer’s eyes. This is a mistake. In order to fix it, send your people to learn mobile applications. The limited resources of mobile screen real estate drove people to change a paradigm. In addition, ask to move to action-based presentation concept. You provide only information needed for the task decision and show a subset of that options.

Process complexity
Last, but not least. There is a need to map processes into the organization. However, when starting to do so, keep in mind you don’t want to replicate all implementations you had in place before you started to transform your organization with PLM system. You can discover processes that simply not needed.

Simplicity Always Wins
If you think about modern trends in hardware, software and almost everything, you can see a strong trend for simplification. When I developed my first PDM/PLM products, the question of “documentation” was absolute. The need to have a documentation was very critical. What was discussable is how much documentation you need and how fast you can deliver it. Nowadays, everybody understood, that in order to stay alive, you need to create products that not require user manuals.

What is my conclusion? My conclusion is simple. Simplicity wins! To understand the true meaning of this is not simple. PLM software people need to understand it in order not to become dinosaurs with user manuals.  Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
5 December, 2016

The stories about disruption are popular in today’s media. Uber for X. Airbnb for Y. You probably heard it many...

21 September, 2010

Last week I had healthy debates with one of my blog readers about different options to deploy PLM for the...

20 November, 2009

How you can explain to customers about PLM on cloud (or on demand)? Quite many times, I’m hearing a phrase...

4 February, 2019

Welcome to another weekly update about my BOM Musings video blog. I started this week with a video explaining when...

11 December, 2017

Jos Voskuil took Part Number topic to another spin and share his thought about  – Intelligent Part or Product Numbers? ...

11 January, 2013

Bill of Materials. Probably the key element in product development and manufacturing. Surprisingly enough, many companies are still struggling with...

23 June, 2014

One day you discover that your PLM implementation project is not doing so well. It happens and it called failure....

23 April, 2015

I assume you are aware about Onshape, the new CAD software outfit founded by Jon Hirschtick and part of his...

17 May, 2016

Few weeks ago I posted a story about cloud CAD and Dropbox Infinite Project. Apparently it was not only me...

Blogroll

To the top