A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

COFES, Microsoft and Engineering Software Business Models

COFES, Microsoft and Engineering Software Business Models
Oleg
Oleg
16 April, 2011 | 2 min for reading

COFES is a think tank for engineering software. This is a place where you can drop any idea and see if it resonates. One of the COFES sessions is so called Maieutic Parataxis session. Think about pitching your idea in front of 300 people. You can see a sequence of 7-10 pitches from people compressed in a row. This is what Maieutic Parataxis is about. Last year I shared the story about Simon Floyd of Microsoft talking about PLM Excels: COFES, Maieutic Parataxies and PLM Excels. This year Simon came with a new idea of future business models for engineering software. Some of Simon’s slides and observations were resonating with my previous thoughts about PLM software business models. About a year ago, I wrote about Faltered Licenses and Future PLM Business Models. I talked about Subscriptions, Advertising and Reverse models. Take a look on Simon’s slides and make your opinion.

What is my take on this? The engineering software is changing slowly. The dynamics are different from the consumer market where the idea of market pace was realized and succeed. I can see multiple reasons why it happens. The most important reason is what I call “a good enough” principle. Traditional manufacturers are very conservative. Software is just a tool for them to produce the result. Existing software can run these companies for years. At the same time, I can see signs of changes. There are two main reasons, in my view: cost and competition. In order to compete on the market, companies need to find more efficient software to get a job done. Engineering software market place can offer a diverse set of tools that can be used. However, the compatibility of these tools, data access and many other reasons can potentially lay down this idea. Leading companies in this space are thinking about market place and application granularity. I think next 5-7 years can show the potential of the realization of this model.  Just my thought…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
19 October, 2010

Few days ago, I run into Gartner Magic Quadrant about IT Project and Portfolio Management. You can get it by...

15 February, 2013

Cloud is trending and we can see more examples of how cloud technologies applies in business. PLM vendors are not...

3 October, 2018

I spent today at Develop3D Live Boston. The event is focusing on engineering and design space and organized by Develop3D...

14 February, 2011

Apple is trending these days. Not surprising me. At the same time, I don’t want to make this post a...

13 December, 2018

Talk to many people about PLM and they tell you that process management is one of the key elements in...

9 February, 2015

Dear friends! I wanted to share some personal news with you. I decided to make a next change in my...

14 September, 2015

Many years ago, I’ve been doing some work implementing PLM-ERP integration using Microsoft BizTalk Server. It was fascinating experience. BizTalk...

26 May, 2017

PLM industry is transforming. We can hear sounds of transformation everywhere. Data management is getting better – we are capable...

18 May, 2025

If there’s one thing I’ve learned watching engineering software evolve, it’s this: adoption follows familiarity. The user adoption process is...

Blogroll

To the top