A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

COFES, Microsoft and Engineering Software Business Models

COFES, Microsoft and Engineering Software Business Models
Oleg
Oleg
16 April, 2011 | 2 min for reading

COFES is a think tank for engineering software. This is a place where you can drop any idea and see if it resonates. One of the COFES sessions is so called Maieutic Parataxis session. Think about pitching your idea in front of 300 people. You can see a sequence of 7-10 pitches from people compressed in a row. This is what Maieutic Parataxis is about. Last year I shared the story about Simon Floyd of Microsoft talking about PLM Excels: COFES, Maieutic Parataxies and PLM Excels. This year Simon came with a new idea of future business models for engineering software. Some of Simon’s slides and observations were resonating with my previous thoughts about PLM software business models. About a year ago, I wrote about Faltered Licenses and Future PLM Business Models. I talked about Subscriptions, Advertising and Reverse models. Take a look on Simon’s slides and make your opinion.

What is my take on this? The engineering software is changing slowly. The dynamics are different from the consumer market where the idea of market pace was realized and succeed. I can see multiple reasons why it happens. The most important reason is what I call “a good enough” principle. Traditional manufacturers are very conservative. Software is just a tool for them to produce the result. Existing software can run these companies for years. At the same time, I can see signs of changes. There are two main reasons, in my view: cost and competition. In order to compete on the market, companies need to find more efficient software to get a job done. Engineering software market place can offer a diverse set of tools that can be used. However, the compatibility of these tools, data access and many other reasons can potentially lay down this idea. Leading companies in this space are thinking about market place and application granularity. I think next 5-7 years can show the potential of the realization of this model.  Just my thought…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
25 February, 2010

I’m continuing to discuss various aspects of PLM on the Cloud and SaaS. The issue I wanted to discuss today...

20 August, 2010

The following publication in VEKTORRUM got me to review again a book “3D Manufacturing Innovation” by Dr. Hiroshi Toriya. I...

9 November, 2012

Two months ago, I had a chance to speak at Social PLM 2012 virtual conference. It is a good time...

11 September, 2018

Cloud adoption is coming to the edge. Earlier today, I’ve learned few interesting facts about cloud adoption from Forbes article...

19 April, 2021

Aras announced the expansion of their enterprise offering – Aras Enterprise SaaS. The press release from the last week says...

18 August, 2009

Product Lifecycle Management and Master Data Management. I had chance to raise this issue few months ago in my post...

22 March, 2020

We are in a huge crisis. This is how the situation that happens outside in the world feels now by...

30 December, 2008

Before we put something on a cloud, let’s think how we can take it off… and I really think this...

20 July, 2009

During last week, I’ve been discussing with one of my long time friends different types of enterprise systems. Very fast...

Blogroll

To the top