A blog by Oleg Shilovitsky
Information & Comments about Engineering and Manufacturing Software

COFES, Microsoft and Engineering Software Business Models

COFES, Microsoft and Engineering Software Business Models
Oleg
Oleg
16 April, 2011 | 2 min for reading

COFES is a think tank for engineering software. This is a place where you can drop any idea and see if it resonates. One of the COFES sessions is so called Maieutic Parataxis session. Think about pitching your idea in front of 300 people. You can see a sequence of 7-10 pitches from people compressed in a row. This is what Maieutic Parataxis is about. Last year I shared the story about Simon Floyd of Microsoft talking about PLM Excels: COFES, Maieutic Parataxies and PLM Excels. This year Simon came with a new idea of future business models for engineering software. Some of Simon’s slides and observations were resonating with my previous thoughts about PLM software business models. About a year ago, I wrote about Faltered Licenses and Future PLM Business Models. I talked about Subscriptions, Advertising and Reverse models. Take a look on Simon’s slides and make your opinion.

What is my take on this? The engineering software is changing slowly. The dynamics are different from the consumer market where the idea of market pace was realized and succeed. I can see multiple reasons why it happens. The most important reason is what I call “a good enough” principle. Traditional manufacturers are very conservative. Software is just a tool for them to produce the result. Existing software can run these companies for years. At the same time, I can see signs of changes. There are two main reasons, in my view: cost and competition. In order to compete on the market, companies need to find more efficient software to get a job done. Engineering software market place can offer a diverse set of tools that can be used. However, the compatibility of these tools, data access and many other reasons can potentially lay down this idea. Leading companies in this space are thinking about market place and application granularity. I think next 5-7 years can show the potential of the realization of this model.  Just my thought…

Best, Oleg

Recent Posts

Also on BeyondPLM

4 6
28 July, 2024

In my recent article about the growing importance of Manufacturing BOM (MBOM) management, I explored various integration methods between CAD,...

21 February, 2017

Last week I blogged about PLM selection politics. People are hard and political games in an organization are unavoidable.Existing PLM...

1 September, 2013

The core fundamental part of every PDM/PLM application is database and related data model. The history of data modeling is...

3 June, 2014

To connect virtual and physical worlds was always one of the most important imperatives. What if I can experience my...

29 April, 2023

I’m heading to the CIMdata PLM roadmap event next week in DC and wanted to give you a sneak peek...

19 December, 2011

Blogosphere and other literature are full of remarks about companies that stuck in different phases of PLM process. You probably...

16 July, 2015

When screening tweetstream yesterday, I caught CIMdata’s Stan Przybylinski question on twitter “What % of product development data authored and/or resides...

3 March, 2010

You can tag almost everything these days – products on Amazon, Photos on Flikr, Facebook friends… However, would you think...

23 March, 2017

Workflows is a very essential part of PLM system and overall product lifecycle management paradigm. PLM vendors are using workflow...

Blogroll

To the top